|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Life began 25 years ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: 1) Just because you are uncomfortable with the notion that there may be nothing more than nature does not make it so that there is actually anything more than nature. 2) There is nothing at all in Evolutionary Theory which requires anyone to think as themselves as a robot, or that nature is all there is.
quote: Of course it is. No life is a product of chance alone. The Theory of Evolution postulates that chance, in the form of random genetic mutation, combined with natural selection, which is the very opposite of chance, is how species change over time. Evolution, in other words, does not work by random chance alone. Why did you think it did?
quote: Your belief is fine, but if you want to call yourself a "science type", I would suggest that you do some self-education WRT the basics of Biology and what the ToE actually states. You have some major misconceptions. Also, your "gut feelings" are irrelevant to the validity of scientific feelings. ------------------"Evolution is a 'theory', just like gravity. If you don't like it, go jump off a bridge."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: The thing is, the liklihood of the ToE being completely wrong after a century of being confirmed by probably billions of pieces of evidence is very, very, very low. The ToE is arguably the most strongly-supported scientific theory in all of science. We have a better understanding of how Evolution works than we do of Gravity. Our entire society could be mistaken about the Sun being the center of the solar system, that matter is made up of atoms, and that germs cause disease, too. Do you consider the Theory of a Heliocentric Solar System, the Atomic Theory of Matter, or the Germ Theory of Disease to be doubtful or uncertain? The Theory of Evolution has just as much, and in some cases, more and stronger evidence to support it than those other theories. ------------------"Evolution is a 'theory', just like gravity. If you don't like it, go jump off a bridge."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Hey, you are the one who said that you don't care to think of yourself as a "robot" and ceasing to exist after your body dies.
quote: Yet, you prefer to not think that this might be the case. I assume you prefer to believe in something else because you are uncomfortable with "nothingness".
quote: Um, no, that is contradictory. Supernatural means "above nature", and used in in this way means "outside nature". If God is detectable by our senses, God is therefore natural, not supernatural.
quote: 1) I'm not an Atheist. 2) My acceptance of the ToE has nothing at all with the rejection of theism.
quote: Who cares? What does this have to do with the observence of a change of allele frequencies in a population over time?
quote: I don't think there is any difference at all between brain activity and consciousness. In other words, the brain produces consciousness. Do you have any evidence that consciousness exists independently from the neurobiology of the brain?
quote: No, I wouldn't, because that egg and sperm that combined to make me would not have met. What's so amazing about that?
quote: and SELECTION. SELECTION. You forgot to absorb what I explained about SELECTION. Selection, as in selecting something, is not random, but selective.
quote: Really? You have evidence of this? Or do you simply assert it without evidence?
quote: Because that particular sperm from your father and that particular egg from your mother happened to combine. It's simple, really.
quote: That's called metabolism.
quote: OK, take away someone's brain. Now, show me their consciousness.
quote: Look, why do you care if I believe in God or not, and what does this belief have to do with the change in allele frequencies in a population over time?
quote: Science is a lot like plumbing. Neither science nor plumbing consider God, yet they both work just fine without including God.
quote: Ok, that's a very nice sermon and example of circular reasoning, but what does this have to do with the change in allele frequencies in a population over time?
quote: Hardly. It just means that I am pretty sure you do, as I have pointed out to you. I certainly have some misconceptions, and I never said I didn't. I would hope that someone wouold point them out to me.
quote: And yet, you are perfectly willing to claim all sorts of things as true without evidence, and you are also willing to reject the evidence for Evolution seemingly based upon your religious preference that it not be reality. Maybe you might apply your sage advice to yourself. I am actually pretty sure that I know quite a bit more about this subject than the average person, but quite a lot less than many of my fellow posters here. The truth is, there's lots that all of us don't know. However, I have confidence that I have a pretty firm understanding of how science is done and the evidence for evolution. I'm also pretty sure, and explained how, you do not have such a firm grasp of either subject. What you don't know about science and evolution is a lot.
quote: Hmm, I don't recall having any kind of "tone" at all.
quote: God is the biggest woman chaser? Women chasing is a good, moral, godly thing to do? Why don't you ask some women how much they like women chasers? So, God is male, then? And a fratboy? ------------------"Evolution is a 'theory', just like gravity. If you don't like it, go jump off a bridge." [This message has been edited by schrafinator, 12-16-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: No, not evolved from your mother, just genetically different. Individuals do not evolve, populations evolve.
quote: I just want to be completely clear here; Theories that deal with the origin of the first life on Earth have nothing to do with the Theory of Evolution. the ToE deals with life once it got here.
quote: Science ignores God because using God as an explanation is, for all practical purposes, giving up on any explanation at all. God can be used to explain everything, so explains nothing.
quote: If you want to do science, you will have to leave God out of the picture as an explanation for naturalistic phenomena. "Godidit" doesn't explain anything.
quote: So, you are saying that we should consider suspect a scientific theory that has never been shown to have any major flaws in over 100 years of research and billions of tests of the theory from every field of life and Geologic sciences? Please explain exactly why we should deny billions of survived tests of the theory?
quote: OK, but this is irrelevant to the fact of Evolution and the evidence that supports the theory.
quote: Me too. These people do not understand that nothing in science is ever 100% proven. However, just as when Einstein's work refined and supplanted Newton's, apples didn't suspend themselves in mid air pending the outcome, the billions of tests that the ToE has survived over the last century are not made invalid because we do not have perfect knowledge.
quote: Incorrect. Most people who disbelieve evolution are uneducated in the matter and/or deny it on religious grounds. In countries where fundamentalist Christians do not have the power over educational institutions and textbook approval boards like they do here, the Theory of Evolution is much better understood, and accepted by the general populace. Scientific issues are not decided in the court of public opinion.
quote: Feeling have nothing to do with it. I have the same feelings about the scientific validity of the Theory of Evolution as I have regarding the Germ Theory of Disease or the Atomic Theory of Matter.
quote: Nothing is "proved beyond a doubt" in science. Otherwise, we would never be able to refine or incorporate new, previously unknown data. However, that evolution happens is about as worthy of doubt as the fact that germs cause disease or that matter is made of atoms.
quote: No, but what do the women he's chasing think or feel about it?
quote: Maybe God is incomprehensible to humans, and you are engaging in a great deal of anthropomorphising?
quote: That's all very nice, but what does this have to do with the change in allele frequencies in populations over time? --------------------+--+--+--+--+--+-- quote: The explanations that use god are meaningless, because by explaining everything, they explain nothing.
quote: If you mean, "science deals with naturalistic explanations for naturalistic phenomena", they this is correct.
quote: There is no material, naturalistic evidence which suggests any god or magic. That doesn't mean God does not exist, but that belief in God is through faith and not evidence.
quote: See above.
quote: No, scientific facts do not change. A scientific fact is a fact, a piece of evidence. Scientific theories change as we gather more and more facts, ang get better at interpreting the facts. [This message has been edited by schrafinator, 12-16-2003]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
OK, when you put it that way, I certainly agree.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Philosophically, I would say that the vast majority of professional scientists fall into the second group. In fact, I have never known a real scientist to express views similar to the first group. I have, however, heard many creationists express utter, unmoving certainty in their correctness.
quote: Thanks for saying so.
quote: Actually, I would tend to say that it's the lazy person who ignores or rejects science in favor of belief in the supernatural. It's much easier to believe what feels good and reassuring than to, well, not believe that.
quote: 40% of scientists are theists, in case you were wondering.
quote: I don't uses the scientific method to find God. However, I do think that you do anthropomorphise god in a way that makes god have what many human males would consider a fantasy sex and party-hearty life. Gee, as a woman, the idea of God as an oversexed drunken fratboy is particulary distasteful.
[/quote]But this change in allele frequencies in populations over time is all that can be discussed in what I write? If you want pure science talk, you's in the wrong place.[/quote] So, do you then agree that the Theory of Evolution is valid? After all, we are supposed to be discussing the evidence for Intelligent Design in this thread. ------------------"Evolution is a 'theory', just like gravity. If you don't like it, go jump off a bridge."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
nator Member (Idle past 2200 days) Posts: 12961 From: Ann Arbor Joined: |
quote: Of course, the majority of Muslims in Iran and Pakistan are likely not Islamic fundamentalists wanting to kill Americans. Christian extremists have been murdering people in the US for much longer than Islamic extremists. However, you are correct that religious training is just that; training. Where you live is the single greatest determinant of what religion you will follow.
quote: Well, then I really don't have much to argue with you about. Thanks for the debate.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024