Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   No Stealing, Unless from Egyptians
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 2 of 27 (72695)
12-13-2003 1:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by JIM
12-13-2003 1:42 PM


Hi,
This is a pretty straightforward explanation.
The command not to steal wasn't given until after the Exodus, the examples you have given happened before God said it was bad to steal.
Sorry, I wish I could agree with you here, but these examples are irrelevant as Moses had not recieved the Commandments yet.
Perhaps if you wanted to say that the Israelites 'stole' the land from the Canaanites then you would have more of a case.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by JIM, posted 12-13-2003 1:42 PM JIM has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 6 of 27 (75412)
12-28-2003 6:23 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by AlmostBlue
12-27-2003 7:58 PM


Re: The meaning of Ex. 3:22 unclear
Hi,
But assumming it meant strip/empty out, it could be justified as JUST WAGES for 200 (or 400 years, depending on your count) that the Israelites provided as FREE slave labor.
It would not have been entirely free, they were fed and housed of course, but apparently life wasn't that bad under the Egyptians as many Israelites wanted to go back there.
According to the enslavement myth the Israelites were employed to build the cities of Pithom and Rameses, these would be primarily for the Pharaoh, why should the Egyptian 'general public' be held responsible when they didn't have any say in the enslavement of the Israelites?
Whether this 'stripping out' actally happened or not is highly debatable as even the Hebrew Bible gives contradictory information about this.
Exodus 11:2 claims that Tell the people that men and women alike are to ask their neighbors for articles of silver and gold."
And
Exodus 12:35-36 The Israelites did as Moses instructed and asked the Egyptians for articles of silver and gold and for clothing. The LORD had made the Egyptians favorably disposed toward the people, and they gave them what they asked for; so they plundered the Egyptians.
But, apparently they didn't have time to ask for silver and gold as:
Exodus 12:39 With the dough they had brought from Egypt, they baked cakes of unleavened bread. The dough was without yeast because they had been driven out of Egypt and did not have time to prepare food for themselves.
Although Exodus 12:39 claims that the Israelites had been driven out of Egypt, apparently they actually fled without the Pharaoh's knowledge:
Exodus 14:5a 5 When the king of Egypt was told that the people had fled
But did they flee? According to Exodus 13:18:
So God led the people around by the desert road toward the Red Sea. [1] The Israelites went up out of Egypt armed for battle.
they had time to arm themselves.
So whether they actually did plunder the Egyptians is not clear from the text.
Another piece of contrary evidence is what ever happened to the gold and silver they allegedly took? There is no Egyptian material culture at all in the Palestinian sites claimed as Israelite, there is nothing at all in fact that can be construed as Egyptian in the new settlements of the bronze age/Iron age villages of the Palestinain hill country.
I think that the plundering of the Egyptians is just another case of ideological history on behalf of the Israelites.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by AlmostBlue, posted 12-27-2003 7:58 PM AlmostBlue has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by AlmostBlue, posted 12-29-2003 4:25 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 8 of 27 (75649)
12-29-2003 4:40 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by AlmostBlue
12-29-2003 4:25 PM


Re: The meaning of Ex. 3:22 unclear
Hi,
My comments about the 'slaves' being well looked after were tongue in cheek. Of course, the Israelites were never in Egypt and the Exodus certainly never happened so the story of the 'stripping' is more wishful thinking than anything else.
We had a guy here a few months back who was going on about the Egyptian government taking out a lawsuit against Israel for the return of these treausres! LOL, the guy was a bit weird but you may be interested in reading the posts when you have a few minutes to spare.
The discussion starts HERE and is a good example of how gullible people can be, his claims had no substance to them at all.
Thanks for the reply.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by AlmostBlue, posted 12-29-2003 4:25 PM AlmostBlue has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by AlmostBlue, posted 12-30-2003 11:58 AM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 10 of 27 (75849)
12-30-2003 3:22 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by AlmostBlue
12-30-2003 11:58 AM


Re: The meaning of Ex. 3:22 unclear
Brian writes "Of course, the Israelites were never in Egypt and the Exodus certainly never happened..." - With all due respect, I wish I was as certain of that as you are...please let me know how you know this for a fact.
I thought everyone who has studied this knows it for a fact, but unstead of me repeating myself you can read my opinions here
You probably will invoke the lack of archeological evidence and/or the lack of Egyptian writings of what would have been a great event (albeit a negative and humiliating one for the Egyptian side - that in itself may hint as to why there is no Egyptian description for posterity about the Exodus, i.e. why *should* they have recorded this defeat by a group of slaves and their invisible Gd).
This is a tired old argument, no offence intended, but the major problem with this argument is that the Egyptians really wouldn’t have needed to record this defeat for there to have been any evidence of it. Now it doesn’t really matter which pharaoh we say was the pharaoh of the Exodus, the Bible doesn’t actually say who it is but if the defeat was as enormous as the Bible claims, if two or three million people suddenly got up and wandered out of Egypt one day then it would leave a fingerprint of some sort in the archaeological record. There are none.
People seem to forget that the Egyptian Empire didn’t stop at the Red Sea, it encompassed Palestine as well, so the Israelites had no where to run too.
An approach that should be considered is that of Israelite national memory. The Bible speaks of approx 600,000 military-age men taking part in the exodus; this extrapolates to 2 million people.
You do know it is humanly impossible for a group to grow from 70 up to 2-3 million in 400 years? It is even more incredulous for it to happen in 215 years if we take another tradition’s record.
Let's assume the Bible is a forgery (all or in part)that was written at the latest by 300BC (the Septuagint "fixes" Exodus) by some commitee. The commitee will go out on a limb by writing about this mass exodus that has "always" been a part of the national history of the Jews and then say to them, in effect, "this is what happened to us and it's always been part of our national memory/identity". More than one person would surely stand up and say, "hey, how come I've never heard about this ancient history that we Jews are supposed to have had?? *MY* grandfather never told me about this identity-forming event..."
Almost every culture that I have studied has an ‘origins’ myth, these explain where the ethnic group came from, when these ancient myths were made up the population were not as critical of these tales as we modern humans are, they had much more important things on their minds.
In addition, if this story had been contrived, why would the Jews willingly bring upon themselves the very difficult obligations involved in observing the Passover festival. Ask any jew (especially the wife!) today what is involved in this (triple-cleaning of the house, kashering the stove, passover-only dishes, passover-only food, no bread/beer/pasta etc.)and you will appreciate that *something* happened in the past to cause this people (even non-religious Jews) to commemorate each spring without fail. Jews have been called many things, but gullible or unquestioning or stupid has not been among them - see the talmudic dialectics for example).
Many cultures have obligations like this, it doesn’t mean that the celebrated event is true. Does the celebration of Xmas mean that there was a virgin birth in which God’s son was born, does the Easter celebration mean that Jesus really did rise from the dead, do people worshipping Jesus as the Messiah promised in the Tanakh mean that he is the Messiah? I think not. Cultures have festivals, it doesn’t follow that observing these festivals mean that the event actually happened.
Perhaps something happened, but it certainly didn’t happen the way the Hebrew Bible claims it did.
Jews rarely agree on much - the old joke about how America with 280 million people does just fine with 2 major political parties
Well we don’t want to confuse Americans by giving them more than two choices do we, imagine if they had more than two at the last election! (Just joking guys before you lynch me)
while little Israel with approx 5 million Jews needs some 30 political parties holds a kernel of truth... happy new year to all.
If you would like to discuss the historicity of the Exodus we should really continue the discussion at the thread I linked to at the beginning of this post since it is off topic here. I would welcome the opportunity to resurrect the discussion of the Exodus.
Happy New year to you as well.
[This message has been edited by Brian, 12-30-2003]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by AlmostBlue, posted 12-30-2003 11:58 AM AlmostBlue has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by ConsequentAtheist, posted 12-30-2003 9:15 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 12 by ConsequentAtheist, posted 12-30-2003 11:07 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 14 by AlmostBlue, posted 12-31-2003 4:25 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 15 of 27 (76060)
12-31-2003 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by AlmostBlue
12-31-2003 4:25 PM


Re: The meaning of Ex. 3:22 unclear
Hi,
Just a quick word to wish you and your family a very safe and a very Happy New Year.
I hope to speak to you in the New Year and look forward to some mutually beneficial discussions.
Best Wishes.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by AlmostBlue, posted 12-31-2003 4:25 PM AlmostBlue has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024