Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Black Holes, for Eta Carinae
Beercules
Inactive Member


Message 51 of 53 (83721)
02-05-2004 10:26 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by RingoKid
02-05-2004 12:54 AM


The Einstein Mattress
The confusion arises because only the surface of the mattress is part of the analogy. You know the difference between a surface and a volume, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by RingoKid, posted 02-05-2004 12:54 AM RingoKid has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by RingoKid, posted 02-06-2004 7:57 AM Beercules has not replied

  
Beercules
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 53 (83944)
02-06-2004 12:45 PM


It doesn't matter how thick the whole mattress is, because the surface of the mattress does not have any thickness at all. That is the whole point of the analogy. Forget about the 3D object and just focus on the 2D aspect of it's surface.
The mattress appears to be flat (overall) while the balloon is curved. But these are not incompatible. If you could zoom into a region of the surface, it would appear to be flat like the surface of the mattress. Zoom back out, and you can see that while appearing flat on small scales, the overall surface is in fact curved.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024