quote:
An example of empirical evidence is that 2+2 will always be 4.
Incorrect.
2+2=4 is an abstract, mathematical "proof", not "empirical evidence".
"Empirical" means "derived by experience". IOW, Empirical evidence is evidence which can be experienced by our senses.
quote:
Empirical evidence doesnt say anything about origins since all the theories are built on interpretation including creation and evolution theories.
Empirical evidence has, in fact, a few things to say about origins in the form of hypothese, but why do you seamlessly shift into talking about the ToE?
Ideas about the origins of the first life are wholly distinct and separate from the Theory of Evolution.
(You've been here a while, Jazz, so I'm surprised that you have fallen into this error)
The ToE is an extremely robust and productive scientific Theory which has withstood probably millions of individual tests, including being confirmed by the evidence from the (relatively) new field of genetics.
Lastly, you mention something about Creation "theories". Since I assume you are referring to the scientific definition of "theory" could you please refer me to a scientific theory of Creation? I have never seen one that has positive evidence observable by anyone, is falsafiable, and that explains all of the observed evidence better than the existing theory.