Moreover, you are wrong on the topic of kinds v. species. A horse, donkey, and zebra are not considered the same species, but they ARE the same kind according to the Bible's definition.
How clever of you to pick examples of recent speciation events. But your model fails for more seperate examples:
Are housecats and tigers in the same kind? They can't breed. Are all kinds of crabs the same kind, as Kent Hovind has claimed? They can't interbreed.
How would you tell the difference between two organisms from similar but originally separate kinds, and two organisms from the same kind who, through what I imagine you term "microevolution", no longer have the ability to interbreed?
It's disingenuous of you to launch into a debate that centers around a term so nebulous you can easily shift the goalposts, and I won't stand and watch it happen.
Also, the arguments have been discussed, attacked, critiqued, and ridiculed, but never legitimately refuted (as it pertains to science).
I look forward to Hitchy proving you quite wrong. At this board alone I have seen each of these arguments refuted again and again. If Hitchy doesn't care to find relevant threads to prove it, I'm more than willing to. It's up to him - he's got dibs.
evolution, creation, and the evidence for and against.
And any time you care to address those issues rather than playing Hovind's Greatest Hits, I'm at your disposal.