Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   10 cubits across and 30 cubits around
SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 30 (98259)
04-06-2004 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by RAZD
04-06-2004 10:13 PM


I can't help 'em here.
Not even the new math can explain it, even throwin' in the metric system and a tolerance stack up by an order of magnitude...unless, one hand is at the molecular level...if one hand equals a wood carbon atom...cipher, cipher....oh wait...thats goin' the wrong way...I'm just building a negative Biblical Noah's Ark...whew...3 years in 12th grade finaly paid off!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by RAZD, posted 04-06-2004 10:13 PM RAZD has not replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 30 (98274)
04-06-2004 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by johnfolton
04-06-2004 10:51 PM


It could be a billion cubits.
It could be a billion cubits...it could have the square footage of 10 nuclear powered ocean going aircraft carriers...it still couldn't house and supply consumables for thousands of animals for a DAY, much less forty...it doesn't make any sense...now ya'll quit being silly. One aircraft carrier has to be re-supplied monthly just to feed a few hundred humans.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by johnfolton, posted 04-06-2004 10:51 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by johnfolton, posted 04-06-2004 11:40 PM SRO2 has replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 6 of 30 (98282)
04-06-2004 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by RAZD
04-06-2004 11:24 PM


Re: 7 hands per sacred cubit
What matters is THIS;
General Characteristics, Nimitz Class
Builder: Newport News Shipbuilding Co., Newport News, Va.
Power Plant: Two nuclear reactors, four shafts
Length, overall: 1,092 feet (332.85 meters)
Flight Deck Width: 252 feet (76.8 meters)
Beam: 134 feet (40.84 meters)
Displacement: Approx. 97,000 tons (87,996.9 metric tons) full load
Speed: 30+ knots (34.5+ miles per hour)
Aircraft: 85
Cost: about $4.5 billion each
Noah did NOT build one of these!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by RAZD, posted 04-06-2004 11:24 PM RAZD has not replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 30 (98290)
04-06-2004 11:54 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by johnfolton
04-06-2004 11:40 PM


Re: Two chapiters were made for Solomons Temple
Yeah, and I'm saying none of that matters....an entire aircraft carrier couldn't it...and somebody expects me to believe that this Noah dude built something BIGGER than an aircraft carrier all by himself?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by johnfolton, posted 04-06-2004 11:40 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by johnfolton, posted 04-07-2004 1:10 AM SRO2 has not replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 30 (98366)
04-07-2004 6:16 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by johnfolton
04-06-2004 11:40 PM


Re: Two chapiters were made for Solomons Temple
yeah, but the general discussion is about the bibles accuracy relative to cubit measurement, my argument is that the cubit dimensions have evidently been exagerated on all fronts...but not exagerated enough to allow for the dimensions to actually accomplish the task they are ascribed to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by johnfolton, posted 04-06-2004 11:40 PM johnfolton has not replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 30 (98404)
04-07-2004 10:13 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Sylas
04-07-2004 9:41 AM


Twelve oxen?
"Three looking toward the south and three looking toward the east"...thats only six...are we to assume that there were three more looking toward the north and another three looking toward west? If there are only three on the south and three on the eawst, cipher, cipher...it's gonna' fall over (I used my highly advanced math skills again).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Sylas, posted 04-07-2004 9:41 AM Sylas has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Sylas, posted 04-07-2004 8:26 PM SRO2 has replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 30 (98446)
04-07-2004 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 16 by Loudmouth
04-07-2004 1:45 PM


You're kiddin' right?
A devinely inspired document written by the creator of perfection himself can be off a tad?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 16 by Loudmouth, posted 04-07-2004 1:45 PM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by Loudmouth, posted 04-07-2004 4:50 PM SRO2 has replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 30 (98477)
04-07-2004 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Loudmouth
04-07-2004 4:50 PM


Re: You're kiddin' right?
but why?, it evidently turned out to be pretty a big deal that is...when there was absolutely no need for it...it's like writing an auto-biography to the human race and not caring if it's right for future generations...surely the all-knowing saw this coming.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Loudmouth, posted 04-07-2004 4:50 PM Loudmouth has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 22 by Loudmouth, posted 04-07-2004 6:29 PM SRO2 has replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 30 (98516)
04-07-2004 6:38 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Loudmouth
04-07-2004 6:29 PM


Re: You're kiddin' right?
Yep, and as you wrote that, you were thinking the whole time; "What I'm writing here is so unnecessary...because it could have already been done".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Loudmouth, posted 04-07-2004 6:29 PM Loudmouth has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by johnfolton, posted 04-07-2004 8:33 PM SRO2 has replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 30 (98551)
04-07-2004 8:37 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Sylas
04-07-2004 8:26 PM


Re: Twelve oxen?
I figured that...I was just taunting you....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Sylas, posted 04-07-2004 8:26 PM Sylas has not replied

SRO2 
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 30 (98559)
04-07-2004 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by johnfolton
04-07-2004 8:33 PM


Re: You're kiddin' right?
All that hooey is good for you...but it don't do a darn thing for science or the advancement of humanity, it instead, haults progress and takes hummanity BACK 2000 years to create wars and killing over something that is inherently too old and too WRONG!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by johnfolton, posted 04-07-2004 8:33 PM johnfolton has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by johnfolton, posted 04-07-2004 10:14 PM SRO2 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024