Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   the ultimate question
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 59 (6360)
03-09-2002 1:23 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by quicksink
03-07-2002 4:23 AM


"here it is: the question that everyone wants to know-
how did the great flood form the fossil strata so perfectly"
--Please emphesize on the your meaning of the perfection of strata formation.
"why does the fossil exclude all modern animals."
--Speciation, I am quite sure you are well aware of this concept.
"someone please give me answer- ps- if the earth is 6000 years old, gove me proof that the continents didn't split."
--The continents did split.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by quicksink, posted 03-07-2002 4:23 AM quicksink has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by quicksink, posted 03-09-2002 3:48 AM TrueCreation has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 59 (9692)
05-15-2002 5:31 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by Peter
05-15-2002 8:43 AM


"Hydrodynamic sorting does NOT explain the fossil sequence in
the geologic column at all."
--Thats right, it doesn't! He did not address fossil succession, but the source of a clean layering of strata. You all waisted quite a bit of breath there!
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Peter, posted 05-15-2002 8:43 AM Peter has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 41 of 59 (9813)
05-16-2002 8:55 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Tranquility Base
05-16-2002 8:45 PM


"but as a scientist "
--What is your area of expertise?
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Tranquility Base, posted 05-16-2002 8:45 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 45 by Tranquility Base, posted 05-16-2002 9:34 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 59 (9821)
05-16-2002 9:43 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Tranquility Base
05-16-2002 9:34 PM


:I'm an experimental and theoretical molecular biologist working on genomics and protein folding (but I am still a theoretical physicist at heart) TC."
--Very nice to hear, we need to even out this lop-sided debate in here.
"Having said that I have read a lot of research level material (reviews and monographs) on paelontology and sedimentology/stratigraphy/tectonics. I have taught myself in detail how paleontology works (and am interested to read these guys comments) and now have a good appreciation for the afore mentioned aspects of mainstream geology. But on quantitative models (whether creationist or evolutionist) I will always have to discuss other peoples work. On moelcular and genomic issues I can talk first hand."
--I can fully agree, I regularely read up on Geology related topics, I have read many books. I may finish my first YEC book though soon, Radioisotopes and the age of the earth, a very nice critique of radioisotopic dating and geochemistry which I admire. Also, please please if you have any material or references which you no longer have use for, I would be most pleased if you would give/sell them to me. I am always on the look out for new material and scientific references.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Tranquility Base, posted 05-16-2002 9:34 PM Tranquility Base has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by Joe Meert, posted 05-16-2002 10:26 PM TrueCreation has not replied
 Message 49 by Tranquility Base, posted 05-16-2002 10:33 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 53 of 59 (9848)
05-16-2002 10:57 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by edge
05-16-2002 10:42 PM


"It hasn't helped yet. We don't even know which rocks represent the flood. "
--.....? Come now.. Lets get past this we both myself and Tranquility have given our 2 cents on our current argument for Flood associated deposits, Cambrian --> Tertiary.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by edge, posted 05-16-2002 10:42 PM edge has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by edge, posted 05-16-2002 11:08 PM TrueCreation has replied

  
TrueCreation
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 59 (9853)
05-16-2002 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by edge
05-16-2002 11:08 PM


"True enough. You get credit for that. However, a look at the creationist literature leaves one groping for a handle. Henceforth, I will assume that you mean Cambrian through Tertiary. Details will be investigated later, but I suggest that you begin to think about the types of deposits that you find in the middle of your flood and the presence of dinosaur nests, tracks, etc. "
--Yes, I have been asked these questions previously, ready when you are.
------------------

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by edge, posted 05-16-2002 11:08 PM edge has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by Joe Meert, posted 05-16-2002 11:36 PM TrueCreation has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024