(Moderators: I really don't know where this goes, although I'm very interested to see how board members will respond.)
The research of Hans Eysenck uncovered dimensions of political values which appear to underlie differences in people's acceptance of evolution vs. creationism, and these can be measured with an inventory found online here:
childrenofmillennium.org -
Acceptance of evolution was found to be a Tough, Radical value, while acceptance of Creationism was a Tender, Conservative value; this means that a person's opinion on the evolution debate is diagnostic of opinions on seemingly unrelated issues (traveling without a ticket, or the legalization of marijuana).
Anyone care to post their scores on the test, along with their position on the evolution debate?
™ Version 4.2