Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   I have a serious question for those that are familiar with the law.
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 1 of 30 (123083)
07-08-2004 7:06 PM


If I have enough money and manpower, is it ok for me to build a warship, submarine, space craft, or any other war machine? Remember that money and manpower is of no concern.

The Laminator

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by PaulK, posted 07-08-2004 7:14 PM coffee_addict has replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 2 of 30 (123086)
07-08-2004 7:14 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by coffee_addict
07-08-2004 7:06 PM


My guess is that if you have the money and manpower you can find somewhere that will let you do it. You might violate some laws obtaining weapons and ammunition even then.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 7:06 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 7:28 PM PaulK has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 3 of 30 (123090)
07-08-2004 7:28 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by PaulK
07-08-2004 7:14 PM


So, it's not legal to obtain, say, rockets?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by PaulK, posted 07-08-2004 7:14 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 07-08-2004 7:30 PM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 7 by PaulK, posted 07-08-2004 7:44 PM coffee_addict has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 4 of 30 (123091)
07-08-2004 7:30 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by coffee_addict
07-08-2004 7:28 PM


It would really depend on the area. Right now in the US most such devices are controled as Destructive Devices.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 7:28 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 7:32 PM jar has replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 5 of 30 (123093)
07-08-2004 7:32 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by jar
07-08-2004 7:30 PM


Well, I'm talking about the US. So, rockets are not legal then?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by jar, posted 07-08-2004 7:30 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by jar, posted 07-08-2004 7:39 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 6 of 30 (123095)
07-08-2004 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by coffee_addict
07-08-2004 7:32 PM


Most rockets would be a controled device.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 7:32 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 7 of 30 (123097)
07-08-2004 7:44 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by coffee_addict
07-08-2004 7:28 PM


Fireworks or surface-to-air missiles ?
I think you will find that there are some restrictions on the shipping of military weapons. If it isn't in International Law then it'll be in the domestic law of the countries making them. Not to mention that you should be rather more worried about what the intelligence orgnaisatiosn will do. With the current climate of opinion buying anything capable of, day, shooting down an airliner will get some quite heavy attention.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 7:28 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Chiroptera, posted 07-08-2004 7:52 PM PaulK has not replied
 Message 9 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 8:10 PM PaulK has replied

  
Chiroptera
Inactive Member


Message 8 of 30 (123098)
07-08-2004 7:52 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by PaulK
07-08-2004 7:44 PM


That will depend on whether the U.S. government considers Lam to be a good ally or a threat to its interests. If an ally, the U.S. can be counted on to veto any U.N. Security Council resolution condemning Lam. If a threat, we could probably expect the U.S. to mount a shock-and-awe military strike against Lam's garage.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by PaulK, posted 07-08-2004 7:44 PM PaulK has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 9 of 30 (123101)
07-08-2004 8:10 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by PaulK
07-08-2004 7:44 PM


So, my best bet would be to build these things secretly underground or on some kind of uninhabited island?

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by PaulK, posted 07-08-2004 7:44 PM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 07-08-2004 9:51 PM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 15 by PaulK, posted 07-09-2004 4:18 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Verzem
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 30 (123106)
07-08-2004 8:41 PM


I think that the new privatization of space travel is going to open up a whole new can of worms in national security areas. If is is okay to have civilians launching rockets into space, what else is going to be legal too? It is a lot to think about. Land, sea, air, and space; a lot is going to change in the near future.
{edited for typo}
Verzem
This message has been edited by Verzem, 07-08-2004 07:43 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Melchior, posted 07-08-2004 9:10 PM Verzem has not replied

  
Melchior
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 30 (123112)
07-08-2004 9:10 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by Verzem
07-08-2004 8:41 PM


Well, there are already corporate owned sattelites with the capability/purpose of taking images of specific spots of Earth, and while the legal bits about those are somewhat messy, it hasn't really caused *that* much problem yet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Verzem, posted 07-08-2004 8:41 PM Verzem has not replied

  
Rand Al'Thor
Inactive Member


Message 12 of 30 (123113)
07-08-2004 9:51 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by coffee_addict
07-08-2004 8:10 PM


So, my best bet would be to build these things secretly underground or on some kind of uninhabited island?
LOL, planning to build a doomsday machine?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 8:10 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 10:02 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

  
coffee_addict
Member (Idle past 507 days)
Posts: 3645
From: Indianapolis, IN
Joined: 03-29-2004


Message 13 of 30 (123116)
07-08-2004 10:02 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Rand Al'Thor
07-08-2004 9:51 PM


No... well... maybe yes... I'll get back to you on that one.

The Laminator

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Rand Al'Thor, posted 07-08-2004 9:51 PM Rand Al'Thor has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by sidelined, posted 07-09-2004 12:29 AM coffee_addict has replied
 Message 22 by Percy, posted 07-09-2004 9:03 AM coffee_addict has not replied

  
sidelined
Member (Idle past 5938 days)
Posts: 3435
From: Edmonton Alberta Canada
Joined: 08-30-2003


Message 14 of 30 (123138)
07-09-2004 12:29 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by coffee_addict
07-08-2004 10:02 PM


Lam
Are you hiring?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 10:02 PM coffee_addict has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by coffee_addict, posted 07-10-2004 4:59 AM sidelined has not replied

  
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 15 of 30 (123198)
07-09-2004 4:18 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by coffee_addict
07-08-2004 8:10 PM


No, your best bet is to find a government that is corrupt enough to accept vast wads of cash from you and paranoid enough to keep out the spoooks - with an adequate industrial base or stockpiles of weapons they can't use. North Korea sounds like a reasonable bet - maybe China, although they're opening up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by coffee_addict, posted 07-08-2004 8:10 PM coffee_addict has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024