Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why the "Big Bang" is an impossibility
Duane Ertle
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 2 (217364)
06-16-2005 11:05 AM


When considering some principles, it is not necessary to keep searching for reasons why it may be an operative concept. It is like searching for the reason a person dies when run over by a semi-truck or a freight train. The person may die of different forms of being run over, but they are dead none the less.
The "Big Bang" is a similar concept. The very basis of its existence determines that no matter how it is taken apart and put back together, it is a physical impossibility. Let's take a look at why this is true.
The basis of all physical existence is electromagnetic energy. It is what matter is composed of. An example of this is when a high frequency photon enters an atom and is converted into a negative and positive electrons. These, in multiples, then, form matter.
There are three equations that cover this aspect of creation. They are E=mc2, m=E/c2 and c2=E/m. These three equations cover the limitations of creation. What I would like to call you attention to is the last of the three. What this concept describes is the basis of all matter and energy. We know this force as gravity. The gravitational fields of earth and it's sun are an overt demenstration of this force that we all realize daily.
When mass converts to it's absolute lowest form of existence, it is this force that it is converted to. What makes this concept so interesting is that a mass cannot restrict this force. Gravitational waves pass through unlimited matter with no hinderance to their movement.
The big bang assumes that mass is able to be compresses to an infinite degree and then form into a new manner of existence in an altogether newly formed universe. The problem with the concept is that once matter is compressed to a limitation, it converts directly into electromagnetic energy and/or gravitational frequencies.
Our planet expends 0.00444 kg/sec of equivaltent mass in form of gravitational waves in order to maintain our gravitational field. The sun expends 665 lbs/sec in order to keep the planets in place. Were the mass of the cosmos to be compresses as the big bang requeires, the mass would dissolve into radiation and/or gravitational waves.
To furter demonstrate this concept, consider that at the 0.716 location from the core point of our planet, mass cannot exist inward from this location because it would be accelerating atomically beyound that of the speed of light. In our sun, the location is 400 miles from the core point where mass cannot exist. Were a mass to be released at these locations, it would accelerate to beyond the speed of light in one second, which it cannot do because it is composed of this entity. Similiar to the impossibility of forming ice or steam apart from water.
A basic concept exists which the "Big Bang" people cannot overcome, no matter how they portray it: mass cannot be accelerated beyond the speed of light (because that is what mass is composed of) so it cannot form a new TIME value as a black hole. c2=E/m does not allow that.
Our world, as all the life forms, have been created. We are in the midst of a created entity that is surrounded by wisdom and principles that cannot be described as other than having been formed by intelligent design - most of which we, as intelligent beings, still do not understand.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminJar, posted 06-16-2005 11:11 AM Duane Ertle has not replied

AdminJar
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 2 (217368)
06-16-2005 11:11 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Duane Ertle
06-16-2005 11:05 AM


Rejected.
To furter demonstrate this concept, consider that at the 0.716 location from the core point of our planet, mass cannot exist inward from this location because it would be accelerating atomically beyound that of the speed of light.
Yet it does.
Topic rejected.
This message has been edited by AdminJar, 06-16-2005 10:12 AM

New Members should start HERE to get an understanding of what makes great posts.
Comments on moderation procedures (or wish to respond to admin messages)? - Go to:
Message 1
Thread Reopen Requests
Considerations of topic promotions from the "Proposed New Topics" forum
Other useful links:
Forum Guidelines, Style Guides for EvC and Assistance w/ Forum Formatting

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Duane Ertle, posted 06-16-2005 11:05 AM Duane Ertle has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024