In many of the topics made by creationists I often see Evolution and Big Bang theory confronted at the same time, because many creationists think that both theories were made together as a conspiracy to try to disprove the existence of god. While it is true that in science these two theories are unrelated, as far as creationists are concerned they couldn't be more related.
In some of my replies I tend to look like I feel that big bang theory and evolution are related, this is because they are both part of science and to describe the universe you have to include all aspects of it so to say that evolution and big bang theory should be kept very seperate is something I don't agree with. History would be incomplete without both of them together.
When I was younger and was only interested in cosmology, physics, astronomy, etc... I was prepared to defend my beliefs but it seemed that every time I ran into a creationist they always wanted to try to disprove evolution, even when I had only mentioned Big Bang theory! Eventually I decided that I had to learn some more about evolution.
I think that the people who believe that evolution and Big Bang theory should be kept seperate are people who mainly study evolution because although my learnings of biology have never mentioned any physics, my learning of physics have often mentioned evolution, not discussing the science of it persay but including it in history so there is no blank spot in the timeline and showing how events in the universe have affected life on earth. To me everything in science is related because it all has the same goal. It's like having detectives in a murder case keeping their evidence seperate and never discussing how they all fit together to show what happened. Anyway tell me what you think.
Note:
Should evolution, big bang theory, creationists be capatalized? A person who believes in evolution is an evolutionist, a person who believes in the big bang is a ? big banger?