Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution and Big Bang theory
notwise
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 4 (220441)
06-28-2005 12:23 PM


In many of the topics made by creationists I often see Evolution and Big Bang theory confronted at the same time, because many creationists think that both theories were made together as a conspiracy to try to disprove the existence of god. While it is true that in science these two theories are unrelated, as far as creationists are concerned they couldnt be more related.
In some of my replys I tend to look like I feel that big bang theory and evolution are related, this is because they are both part of science and to describe the universe you have to include all aspects of it so to say that evolution and big bang theory should be kept very seperate is something I dont agree with. History would be incomplete without both of them together.
When I was younger and was only interested in cosmology, physics, astronomy, etc... I was prepared to defend my beliefs but it seemed that every time I ran into a creationist they always wanted to try to disprove evolution, even when I had only mentioned Big Bang theory! Eventually I decided that I had to learn some more about evolution.
I think the people who believe that evolution and Big Bang theory should be kept seperate are people who mainly study evolution because although my learnings of biology have never mentioned any physics, my learning of physics have often mentioned evolution, not discussing the science of it persay but including it in history so there is no blank spot in the timeline. To me everything in science is related because it all has the same goal. Its like having detectives in a murder case keeping their evidence seperate and never discuss how they all fit together to show what happened. Anyway tell me what you think.
This message has been edited by notwise, 06-28-2005 03:03 PM

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by AdminSylas, posted 06-28-2005 12:44 PM notwise has replied

AdminSylas
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 4 (220451)
06-28-2005 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by notwise
06-28-2005 12:23 PM


This looks interesting. I'll promote this, but to get your new thread off to the best possible start, can you do a quick edit please? Put a blank line between paragraphs, and add apostrophes for words like "couldn't" or "don't". The word "theorys" should be "theories".
Thanks -- Sylas

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by notwise, posted 06-28-2005 12:23 PM notwise has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by notwise, posted 06-28-2005 3:14 PM AdminSylas has replied

notwise
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 4 (220517)
06-28-2005 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 2 by AdminSylas
06-28-2005 12:44 PM


Better?
In many of the topics made by creationists I often see Evolution and Big Bang theory confronted at the same time, because many creationists think that both theories were made together as a conspiracy to try to disprove the existence of god. While it is true that in science these two theories are unrelated, as far as creationists are concerned they couldn't be more related.
In some of my replies I tend to look like I feel that big bang theory and evolution are related, this is because they are both part of science and to describe the universe you have to include all aspects of it so to say that evolution and big bang theory should be kept very seperate is something I don't agree with. History would be incomplete without both of them together.
When I was younger and was only interested in cosmology, physics, astronomy, etc... I was prepared to defend my beliefs but it seemed that every time I ran into a creationist they always wanted to try to disprove evolution, even when I had only mentioned Big Bang theory! Eventually I decided that I had to learn some more about evolution.
I think that the people who believe that evolution and Big Bang theory should be kept seperate are people who mainly study evolution because although my learnings of biology have never mentioned any physics, my learning of physics have often mentioned evolution, not discussing the science of it persay but including it in history so there is no blank spot in the timeline and showing how events in the universe have affected life on earth. To me everything in science is related because it all has the same goal. It's like having detectives in a murder case keeping their evidence seperate and never discussing how they all fit together to show what happened. Anyway tell me what you think.
Note:
Should evolution, big bang theory, creationists be capatalized? A person who believes in evolution is an evolutionist, a person who believes in the big bang is a ? big banger?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by AdminSylas, posted 06-28-2005 12:44 PM AdminSylas has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by AdminSylas, posted 06-28-2005 3:31 PM notwise has not replied

AdminSylas
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 4 (220523)
06-28-2005 3:31 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by notwise
06-28-2005 3:14 PM


Re: Better?
Do you mean "capitalized"? What you have looks fine now. The paragraphs especially are a big help for readability. I've promoted the first post of the thread to be a new topic, at Evolution and Big Bang theory, and I am closing this thread down. Thanks -- AdminSylas

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by notwise, posted 06-28-2005 3:14 PM notwise has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024