Summations Only

Outward expansions start by accelerating. After that they slow down. The expansion is not ongoing, like an 'accelerating expansion.'I explain this in my 'Observational Evidence' on page 1.

Yes, outward expansions accelerate.
I agree.But you don't seem to agree: Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Surely you can at least see the irony in your posting a message asking me to be more "coherant".But more to the point, asking me to be more clear in response to the collection of belly-farts that make up your position in this thread approaches Ozymandias level hubris. "We're going in?" Please.

The observational evidence says that you already responded to this message a few days ago, and now evidently caught up in your hysteria you have become opaque to such details and have replied again.And I see you've also done a double reply to my Message 87.To touch lightly on one of your points, like the story of being chased by a bear, it isn't necessary that I be smarter than Newton, only smarter and saner than you.--Percy

Instructions for finding the gibberish of Peter Lamont:

1. Click on this link: Message 1
   ​
2. Click on the "Peter Lamont Posts Only" link that's in the navigation column for Message 1.
   ​
3. Read.

--Percy

They're evidence of something. They aren't evidence in support of your thesis until you make an evidence-based connection between then, not just a wild extrapolation.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

Okay, so we have a Vac in the center of a room. All the air is moving towards it. The air on the left side of the room is moving towards the center of the room and the air on the right side of the room is moving towards the center of the room. Therefore, the air on the left side of the room is moving towards the air on the right side of the room and the air on the right side of the room is moving towards the air on the left side of the room.Do you understand that? Not necessarily. Take an amount of an ideal gas and confine it to a fixed volume so that it cannot expand. Then, lower the temperature of that gas. The pressure lowers and the gas does not expand.PV=nRT If the case of our vortex example, things are moving towards each other in the X-Y plane (left or right and up or down on your computer screen), the direction they are moving away from each other is in the Z-direction (back into the depths of your screen). Before the air starts going into the vacuum, expanding into the depths of your screen, they are moving towards each other (from the left and right of the screen towards the center).Do you understand?

What you said was:

quote:

---

The only kind of expansion that accelerates is Inward.

---

That is a false statement. While the explosion is exploding, the expansion is accelerating outward. Your description has been proven wrong. If you were right, we would see a lot of blue shifted galaxies... but we don't.

We can see distant galaxies, and the evidence for an expanding universe is that these galaxies are redshifted with the amount of redshift correlating to distance.You keep ignoring this evidence and the empirical fact that we can observe the universe. You claim that all matter is moving towards the center of a vortex and getting closer together which is the opposite of expansion.

No, it doesn't. It is an oxymoron. It gains pressure as more air is forced into a smaller space. The loss in pressure is on the other side of the nozzle where matter moves away from each other.

None of which actually deal with the expansion of spacetime.

Panda, I repeat, explosions (Big-Bang) start by accelerating. That's the initial kick. How long does an explosion last - half a second?An 'accelerating expansion' starts slowly and then accelerates in the manner of any Inward Expansion. (See my Observational Evidence on page 1). It is ongoing, as is the 'accelerating expansion' of the Observable Universe.We are going in, not out. Any 'accerlerating expansion' is Inward. Outward Expansions all slow down and eventually stop.Let me know what you think. As for those statements I made, I stand by them.

No Nukes,
This is the 'Mable Theory,' Mable being the Mother of All Black hoLEs. Mable has the most attractive body in the Universe - the black hole at the center nof the Universe.This theory breaks no Laws. You call these Laws, 'Belly-Farts', that's your opinion, of course. It tells me more about you, No Nukes,Any accelerating expansion is inward; Outward expansions all slow down and stop. That's just the Nature of the beast.If it's accelerating while it's expanding, that's Inward. Inward expansions all start slowly and then accelerate. I explain this clearly in my 'Observational Evidence' on page 1.Ozymandias level hubris? That's supposed to be clear? I don't think so!

Percy, Just because you believe the UIniverse is run by Anti-Gravity, like the rest of the world, doesn't make me wrong. If you understood these 'accelerating expansions,' you'd see they're all Inward.It's Gravity that runs the Universe, that keeps the Moon orbiting Earth - not Anti-Gravity. Too bad you can't see this.

I did that. I went back top my message 1, about the Evolution of the Universe. Darwin had the same problem, up against years of 'conditioning', what chance did he have? And yet, his theory is the one that survives to this day.You believe in a Universe that was created instantly. Just like in the Bible. Are you religous, Percy? You can tell me.