|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,890 Year: 4,147/9,624 Month: 1,018/974 Week: 345/286 Day: 1/65 Hour: 1/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 3427 days) Posts: 40 From: Modena, Italy Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Monotheism or Enotheism? What is more apt for Christian Religion? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
So how does one recognise any given concept as a god? I'm not really sure that we're dealing with facts that we can be cognisant of. If I tell you that I'm thinking of a god, then there's not really much for you to go on other than my say-so. If I'm thinking of a powerful supernatural being that is not a god, then how can you tell me that my concept actually is that of a god? How would you know? Its my concept...
I thought mono meant one god concept and poly meant many god concepts. I figured poly still meant that you had one god concept, there were just a bunch of beings that fit within it.
In either case the concept(s) in question need to be recognisably godly don't they? I don't think we can really be cognisant of what "godly" actually is. Its in the heart and mind of the believer.
CS writes: They're mutually exclusive: That is a very weird way to look at things. If a god "a supernatural being, who is worshipped as the controller of some part of the universe" how on Earth can you conclude that a superntural being who controls all/multiple aspects of the universe doesn't qualify? You must have missed my explanation:
quote: I wasn't saying the terms were mutually exclusive, its the belief in both that is. If you believe in God, as your source defines it, then there can't be any other gods.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Straggler writes: In either case the concept(s) in question need to be recognisably godly don't they? CS writes: I don't think we can really be cognisant of what "godly" actually is. Its in the heart and mind of the believer. I really don't see why we have to adopt some sort of theistic relativism just because some Christians who believe in entities that would qualify as gods in a different context want to proclaim themselves to be mono-theists rather than poly-theists. The definition provided encompasses single creator gods who control all aspects of reality and gods who are part of pantheons where individual gods have control over different aspects. If one describes an entity and it meets those criteria why wouldn't we call it a god (other than to appease self-proclaimed mono-theists)?
CS writes: If I tell you that I'm thinking of a god, then there's not really much for you to go on other than my say-so. If I'm thinking of a powerful supernatural being that is not a god, then how can you tell me that my concept actually is that of a god? How would you know? Its my concept... This is just relatavistic nonsense. How does belief have any bearing on whether something is actually godly or not? I am not a god. Regardless who may or may not believe that I am. Equally if there is a supernatural creator of the universe with supernatural control over aspects of nature then this being is a god regardless of what anyone believes (or even if there is anyone to believe)
CS writes: I wasn't saying the terms were mutually exclusive, its the belief in both that is. If you believe in God, as your source defines it, then there can't be any other gods. A Christian doesn't need to believe in the existence of Thor to recognise that conceptually Thor is a god. Obviously.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
How does belief have any bearing on whether something is actually godly or not? Because whether or not something is godly depends on what people believe about it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Catholic Scientist writes:
So the fundamentalists' Satan is a god who controls stuff and fundamentalists are not monothesists.
If you have a sole God that controls everything, then you cannot have other gods controlling stuff too.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
satan is a parasite. he only "controls" them who allow it.
As a created being, satan is incapable of himself creating anything apart from confusion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Catholic Scientist writes:
So the fundamentalists' Satan is a god who controls stuff and fundamentalists are not monothesists. If you have a sole God that controls everything, then you cannot have other gods controlling stuff too. Its possible; I don't know much about the fundamentalists' Satan.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Thugpreacha writes:
Most Christians seem to say that God doesn't force Himself on you either - i.e. He only "controls" them who allow it.
satan is a parasite. he only "controls" them who allow it. Thugpreacha writes:
Again, the same could be said of God. He created the hardness of Pharoah's heart which caused a lot of confusion and/or other related troubles for the Israelites.
As a created being, satan is incapable of himself creating anything apart from confusion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18348 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
perhaps God used satan as a tool to harden the heart. God can use satan as a tool, but satan cant use God for anything.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
But that is not what the story says, is it?
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tangle Member Posts: 9512 From: UK Joined: Member Rating: 4.8
|
Thugpreacha writes:
perhaps God used satan as a tool to harden the heart. A bit like cholesterol? Life, don't talk to me about life - Marvin the Paranoid Android
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
CS writes: Because whether or not something is godly depends on what people believe about it. You are conflating the terminology used to convey what it is that people believe to actually exist with the terminology people use to convey conceptual meaning of things regardless of any belief about their existence. I don't need to believe in the existence of Thor to recognise that conceptually Thor is a god. A Christian doesn't need to believe in the existence of Thor to recognise that conceptually Thor is a god either. Whether Thor conceptually qualifies as a god or not has nothing to do with one's beliefs about which gods do or don't actually exist. Why would it?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
I think we've been through this before:
CS writes: Now, with Satan, it does seem that some christians' beliefs could be considered polythiestic. In the sense that Satan could be considered a god in his own right, they would be believing in two gods. But I don't think that makes all of christianity polytheistic. You're right though, some christians could be considered polytheistic. Message 201 Firstly - I'm not saying all Christians are polytheistic. Having seen GDR's beliefs spelt out I wouldn't describe him as polytheistic for example. But I am saying that there seem to be quite a lot of Christians who describe themselves as monotheists whilst simultaneously believing in the existence of various entities that would be called 'gods' in any other context.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined:
|
Phat writes: God can use satan as a tool, but satan cant use God for anything. So you see Satan as the doer of God's dirty work? A sort of attack dog for the unsavoury but necessary things in life?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 422 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
The classic view of Satan is as God's tester, the assayer. Satan does not oppose God, rather Satan only follows God's orders.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
You are conflating the terminology used to convey what it is that people believe to actually exist with the terminology people use to convey conceptual meaning of things regardless of any belief about their existence. I don't need to believe in the existence of Thor to recognise that conceptually Thor is a god. A Christian doesn't need to believe in the existence of Thor to recognise that conceptually Thor is a god either. Whether Thor conceptually qualifies as a god or not has nothing to do with one's beliefs about which gods do or don't actually exist. Why would it? It wouldn't, you've misunderstood me. What matters it what the believer in Thor thinks about Thor. That's how we determine the properties to assign to Thor, and those properties determine whether or not he is considered a god.
But I am saying that there seem to be quite a lot of Christians who describe themselves as monotheists whilst simultaneously believing in the existence of various entities that would be called 'gods' in any other context. I don't think so, but if you're not willing to examine what the Christians actually believe about these beings. I could just as easily provide a diluted definition of "king", and then say that because your princes fit that definition, then Britain should be considered a polyarchy. I think it should matter if you guys actually see them as your king or not, and not whether or not I can define the word to include them.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024