Philip writes:
You dogmatically state, again: "There is no evidence for a young earth"
Let's put this back in context. In
Message 7 you said:
Surely, WI, there will always be data that supports a very young earth...
To which I replied in
Message 8:
There is no scientific evidence supporting a young earth.
Since these were contextual offside comments not directly pertinent to the main topic, which is your speculations about the nature of time, details weren't appropriate and I don't see anything dogmatic about either of our statements. If you wish to discuss the evidence for a young earth simply open a thread.
But I think you're losing sight of your original topic. You began with speculations about a "2 clock system", and now you're off discussing radiometric dating and the origin of the heavy elements. Could you try to tie in for us how this all relates to your original post?
--Percy