Questions about a "new" (?) big bang idea

EVERYTHING!!!

LOL........ LOL........... LOL..............------------------
No webpage found at provided URL: www.hells-handmaiden.com

My thoughts exactly, i sense some kind of attempt to create an 'aesthetically pleasing' or abstract/surrealist perhaps contemporary model of the universe with a touch of Leibniz. -definitely not physics.

Hi Ashes,I'll give you a couple days to try to tie this thread in with what is already known in physics, or at least to engage in meaningful discussion on the topic (ie, even though Shakespeare told us that brevity is the sole of wisdom, "Everything!!!" as a response is taking it a bit far). Failing that, the topic will be closed.------------------
--EvC Forum Administrator

Nah, go ahead and close it. The "everything" was just me giving up. I just meant that I have notes drawn in pictures. It works for me, ok? I don't think that thinking about the creation of the universe should be reserved for physicists. I have studied "physics", even if I've studied it in a different "language" than you. Understanding is more than an accumulation of facts. Although I admit to the importance of learning what is "already known". I'm not denying that; I'm always researching things. The thing is, the more I learn, the more questions I have.But go ahead and delete this if you want, because it has strayed off course anyway. And I have no desire to try to explain myself any further, since no one is even trying to hear me out. My reason in coming here was just to try to figure something out, not to prove myself. I'm satisfied in understanding it for myself; if you need it proven in terms you can understand then it's up to you.~ashes
. . . .
http://www.dreamcrumbs.comp.s. If the center of the earth is really densely packed iron, wouldn't that make it reflective?