I am not declaring anything. I am just pointing out the increasing lunacy in Borger's posts.
This most recent issue involves two species that I generated sequence data for. I had posted a link to the alignment:
http://www2.norwich.edu/spage/alignmentgam.htm
I had originally posted a link to this alignment when Borger asked for some evidence for NDT. One familiar with DNA sequence data will immediately see why that is. It came up again in this thread.
Borgern then thought he had stumbled onto something, and asked about two of the species in the alignment, coded as Tob and Cap.
He wondered why there was such a difference between them, implying that evolution 'couldn't explain it.'
I pointed out that one was a New world primate, the other an Old World primate, separated by at least 40 million years.
He ignored my response for some time, but has now again tried to make it an issue for some reason, by claiming that he needs the "phylo-tree" in order for him to assess it. Funny - he didn't seem to need it when he was trying to declare it a problem for evolution.
More later...