|
Msg Num
|
Message Details
|
Reply To
|
Replies
|
|
1
|
Message 1
|
|
|
|
2
|
Message 2
|
|
|
|
3
|
Seems Bogus (Message 3)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
4
|
Re: Seems Bogus (Message 4)
|
Seems Bogus (Message 3)
|
|
|
5
|
Re: Seems Bogus (Message 5)
|
Re: Seems Bogus (Message 4)
|
|
|
6
|
comparison to primary article (Message 6)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
7
|
Message 7
By Larni
07-05-2006 6:01 AM
|
Message 1
|
|
|
8
|
No bottleneck (Message 8)
By nwr
07-05-2006 7:22 AM
|
Message 7
By Larni
07-05-2006 6:01 AM
|
|
|
9
|
mathematic models again? (Message 9)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 7:40 AM
|
Re: Seems Bogus (Message 4)
|
|
|
10
|
Re: mathematic models again? (Message 10)
|
mathematic models again? (Message 9)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 7:40 AM
|
|
|
11
|
Re: mathematic models again? (Message 11)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 9:23 PM
|
Re: mathematic models again? (Message 10)
|
|
|
12
|
wrong again... (Message 12)
|
Re: mathematic models again? (Message 11)
By RAZD
07-05-2006 9:23 PM
|
|
|
13
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 13)
|
wrong again... (Message 12)
|
|
|
14
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 14)
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 13)
|
|
|
15
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 15)
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 14)
|
|
|
16
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 16)
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 15)
|
|
|
17
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 17)
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 16)
|
|
|
18
|
incredulity is not a criticism (Message 18)
|
Re: wrong again... (Message 17)
|
|
|
19
|
Re: incredulity is not a criticism (Message 19)
|
incredulity is not a criticism (Message 18)
|
|
|
20
|
some model details (Message 20)
|
Re: incredulity is not a criticism (Message 19)
|
|
|
21
|
It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
|
wrong again... (Message 12)
|
|
|
22
|
Did or could have (Message 22)
|
It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
|
|
|
23
|
Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 23)
|
It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
|
|
|
24
|
Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 24)
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:12 AM
|
It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 21)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:16 AM
|
|
|
25
|
Message 25
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:17 AM
|
Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 24)
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:12 AM
|
|
|
26
|
email for paper (Message 26)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:20 AM
|
Re: It just doesn't add up pink. (Message 23)
|
|
|
27
|
Message 27
By nwr
07-08-2006 11:03 AM
|
Message 25
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:17 AM
|
|
|
28
|
Appendicies for Paper (Message 28)
|
email for paper (Message 26)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:20 AM
|
|
|
29
|
genealogical, not genetic (Message 29)
|
Message 25
By RAZD
07-08-2006 10:17 AM
|
|
|
30
|
Message 30
By RAZD
07-08-2006 11:58 AM
|
Message 27
By nwr
07-08-2006 11:03 AM
|
|
|
31
|
Re: Appendicies for Paper (Message 31)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:02 PM
|
Appendicies for Paper (Message 28)
|
|
|
32
|
Message 32
By nwr
07-08-2006 12:26 PM
|
Message 30
By RAZD
07-08-2006 11:58 AM
|
|
|
33
|
Re: genealogical, not genetic (Message 33)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:39 PM
|
genealogical, not genetic (Message 29)
|
|
|
34
|
Message 34
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:41 PM
|
Message 32
By nwr
07-08-2006 12:26 PM
|
|
|
35
|
Message 35
By nwr
07-08-2006 1:07 PM
|
Message 34
By RAZD
07-08-2006 12:41 PM
|
|
|
36
|
Got the paper, but ... (Message 36)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 8:39 PM
|
genealogical, not genetic (Message 29)
|
|
|
37
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 37)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:09 PM
|
Got the paper, but ... (Message 36)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 8:39 PM
|
|
|
38
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 38)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:39 PM
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 37)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:09 PM
|
|
|
39
|
How many generations? (Message 39)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:00 AM
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 38)
By nwr
07-08-2006 9:39 PM
|
|
|
40
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 40)
By nwr
07-09-2006 10:24 AM
|
How many generations? (Message 39)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:00 AM
|
|
|
41
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 41)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:36 PM
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 40)
By nwr
07-09-2006 10:24 AM
|
|
|
42
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 42)
By nwr
07-09-2006 2:39 PM
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 41)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:36 PM
|
|
|
43
|
Noah? (Message 43)
|
Message 1
|
|
|
44
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 44)
By sfs
07-09-2006 5:07 PM
|
Got the paper, but ... (Message 36)
By RAZD
07-08-2006 8:39 PM
|
|
|
45
|
Re: Noah? (Message 45)
|
Noah? (Message 43)
|
|
|
46
|
Re: Noah? (Message 46)
|
Re: Noah? (Message 45)
|
|
|
47
|
Re: Noah? (Message 47)
By nwr
07-09-2006 11:19 PM
|
Re: Noah? (Message 46)
|
|
|
48
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 48)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:03 AM
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 42)
By nwr
07-09-2006 2:39 PM
|
|
|
49
|
Re: Noah? (Message 49)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:04 AM
|
Re: Noah? (Message 46)
|
|
|
50
|
Re: Noah? (Message 50)
|
Re: Noah? (Message 49)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:04 AM
|
|
|
51
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 51)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:10 AM
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 44)
By sfs
07-09-2006 5:07 PM
|
|
|
52
|
Re: Noah? (Message 52)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:14 AM
|
Re: Noah? (Message 50)
|
|
|
53
|
incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 53)
|
Re: How many generations? (Message 41)
By RAZD
07-09-2006 1:36 PM
|
|
|
54
|
Re: incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 54)
By sfs
07-10-2006 9:53 PM
|
incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 53)
|
|
|
55
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 55)
By sfs
07-10-2006 10:05 PM
|
Re: Got the paper, but ... (Message 51)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 12:10 AM
|
|
|
56
|
I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 11:15 PM
|
incorrect ideas about peer-review and ancestry (Message 53)
|
|
|
57
|
still haven't read thoroughly, it seems... (Message 57)
|
I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 11:15 PM
|
|
|
58
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
|
I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 56)
By RAZD
07-10-2006 11:15 PM
|
|
|
59
|
Message 59
By RAZD
07-11-2006 8:09 AM
|
still haven't read thoroughly, it seems... (Message 57)
|
|
|
60
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 60)
By sfs
07-11-2006 8:22 AM
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
|
|
|
61
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 61)
By nwr
07-11-2006 8:43 AM
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 60)
By sfs
07-11-2006 8:22 AM
|
|
|
62
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 62)
By PaulK
07-11-2006 8:50 AM
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
|
|
|
63
|
Re: Noah? (Message 63)
By PaulK
07-11-2006 9:01 AM
|
Re: Noah? (Message 50)
|
|
|
64
|
So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 64)
By RAZD
07-15-2006 8:40 AM
|
Re: I stand corrected - now lets deal with the math problem ... (Message 58)
By nwr
07-11-2006 12:00 AM
|
|
|
65
|
Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 65)
By nwr
07-15-2006 9:21 AM
|
So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 64)
By RAZD
07-15-2006 8:40 AM
|
|
|
66
|
Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 66)
By sfs
07-15-2006 10:21 PM
|
So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 64)
By RAZD
07-15-2006 8:40 AM
|
|
|
67
|
Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 67)
|
Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 66)
By sfs
07-15-2006 10:21 PM
|
|
|
68
|
Handshake Jack (Message 68)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:08 PM
|
Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 67)
|
|
|
69
|
but good science is cross-checked (Message 69)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:18 PM
|
Re: So what is this good for? Unchecked speculation? (Message 65)
By nwr
07-15-2006 9:21 AM
|
|
|
70
|
Re: Handshake Jack (Message 70)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:26 PM
|
Handshake Jack (Message 68)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:08 PM
|
|
|
71
|
Re: but good science is cross-checked (Message 71)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:30 PM
|
but good science is cross-checked (Message 69)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:18 PM
|
|
|
72
|
Re: Handshake Jack (Message 72)
|
Handshake Jack (Message 68)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 9:08 PM
|
|
|
73
|
Re: Handshake Jack (Message 73)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:06 PM
|
Re: Handshake Jack (Message 72)
|
|
|
74
|
Re: Handshake Jack (Message 74)
|
Re: Handshake Jack (Message 73)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:06 PM
|
|
|
75
|
theoretical physicists ... (Message 75)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:11 PM
|
Re: but good science is cross-checked (Message 71)
By sfs
07-16-2006 9:30 PM
|
|
|
76
|
Re: theoretical physicists ... (Message 76)
By sfs
07-16-2006 11:08 PM
|
theoretical physicists ... (Message 75)
By RAZD
07-16-2006 10:11 PM
|
|