Get back on the subject. If you want to discuss some of the extraneous stuff you are bringing up, there are threads available.
You mentioned
Don't even try to discredit my information because I say I'm a philosopher.
and you can be sure that no one will try to discredit your statements because you are a philosopher. They will be discredited simply because they are wrong.
Before you decide, you might want to check This site
Kent Hovind has less credibility than Ron Wyatt. In particular, on the introduction page, look at the link to conspiracy quotes.
Then perhaps we can get back to discussing macro-evolution, which should be easy to get through. You are a quick learner and will have no trouble with it at all.
and once you finish, come back and there are many here who can help point you towards some real information. I know that you can do it and have complete faith in your ability to handle reality.
I would say the sum total of the very small changes that led from the first amino acids to the life we see about us today.
The key to understanding that there is no such thing as Macro vs Micro evolution is time. Big changes are simply the sum of many small changes happening over very long periods of time.