PROOF OF GOD

IIS 8.5 Detailed Error - 404.0 - Not Foundhttp://www.19x19lc.com/chapter05.htmGil:I only posted a quick overview of my ultimate claims. IF the evidence posted is true THEN this in turn evidences the truth/claims of the overview.About the links: just scroll down to the relevant stuff concerning the Isaiah text.BTW, I have not forsaken our other debate. It's just that your atheist brothers have saved you by suspending me.Are you not curious as to what is the acid proof that the Spirit dwells in a person ? - the one thing which cannot be faked ? (hint: its in the Bible)

Do I need web hosting in order to post pictures, diagrams, and text ?

Absolute rubbish.The only reason such SHOWS are produced IS BECAUSE nobody knows how it was constructed.

Why do you believe this lie: But not this "lie": Don't bother with a reply - it is rhetorical.If students could actually do what you asserted then the SHOW would of never been produced.Nobody can cut limestone/edit: granite blocks (20 tons average) with optical precision using hand tools, and move them around without cranes, your quickness to embrace these crank demonstrations defies reality and the evidence which makes your constant purported allegiance to evidence selective lip service.These "Hollywood" shows are the epitome of desparation and dedication to dogma, which is ONLY done because the alternative is the evidence of Divinity, and the Romans 1 wrath of God sense removal is further demonstrated, despite the evidence - God is not an option.This message has been edited by WILLOWTREE, 07-07-2004 03:11 PM

Can I take this as an admission that the evolutionary scenario of ultra slow step by tiny step is falsified by this statement of fact ?

This opinion implies that no evidence has been posted.I will not go further with you until the evidence is acknowledged.Why should I keep posting if all you are going to do is act like it aint there ?Why is it that some people are allowed to evidence by link but not me ?All my previous evidence was argued and explained while citing the source.....sources that obtained their evidence IN EGYPT, which makes their evidence first hand.While the rules of this Forum are actually quite ambiguous, I have certainly satisfied these requirements and beyond. I have made claims, posted the evidence, and cited the source, a source in the case of Dr. Rutherford who produced ALL his evidence from being in Egypt.UNTIL THIS IS RECTIFIED AND ACKNOWLEDGED I HAVE NOTHING TO GAIN.I am personally satisfied that the responses all equate to saying "where is the evidence ?"In lieu of the evidence this is all you can say.Nobody has met my evidence with contrary evidence with source.I will not be held to a different standard in order to comply with a silent handicap which you are giving yourselves.Either acknowledge what I have posted or create a one line post of dismissal and acknowledge it in this thoroughly defeated way.

Percy:I have agreed to post the "math" when I re-acquire the sources. I will have them tonight and can begin posting tomorrow.BUT, until the primary evidence is acknowledged as evidence (Dr. Rutherford's evidenced produced by his research IN EGYPT) then to continue without this recognition is to agree that I have not posted evidence.Dr. Rutherford says the Pyramid is 5449 PI in height.That is a claim with source cite.That is evidence.I have agreed to post the math but not until the standard of what evidence is is established and evenly applied.Pink is not even paying attention or he wouldn't of acted like he didn't know that I had to re-acquire the sources.Concerning the unit of measure: I have posted the primary evidence with source. Until someone argues my position in their own words and THEN tells me why it is error with their sources this is a double standard.Everything I say is ignored to some degree, until some honesty is directed my way I will not act like it is there and play the fool.

Yes, of course.Now, about the CENTER of world's land mass claim:Here is a site that reflects your view:http://www.catchpenny.org/pyramid.htmlHere is a site defending my sources:http://www.thairuralnet.org/sunit/pyramid2.htmlPlease review them thoroughly.Now go to this site and get a whiff of the type of math employed used to determine the height by anti-supenaturalist Flinders Petrie. Note that Petrie's height is not anywhere near 5449. Rutherford will refute Petrie when I post his math ASAP. The point is to get a feel for the math !petrie Click on "Levels up the Pyramid"

Pinkie:Just for the record:The link you critiqued in the post I am responding to was ONLY offered to support my sources for the CENTER of land mass claim.Go back and re-read the initial post - I only linked for that particular claim - not the height.The Petrie site was linked to show how complicated the math is.If you think Rutherford is going to be different ......

By this same logic THEN we must toss everything Charles Darwin claimed.

Sidelined:I appreciate your input.BUT, the site you critiqued was only offered for its center of world's land mass value. The Earth is a "sphere" flattened at the poles, but in reality it is really equatorial protuberance via centrifugal force which accounts for the true spheric defect.I am going to recover the measurements and math which evidence that the Pyramid's slight concavity doubled equals the curvature of the Earth.

Anderson is a Jehovah's Witness/Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society member.He has created a post which essentially says that the Isaiah verse does not mean what it says and he defines "altar" using only one of the definitions of that word. I have already addressed this specific issue early on in this debate. I suggest Anderson acquaint himself with that portion of the debate.In the meantime here is a site which evidences the fraud and bias of Jehovah's Witness concerning the Pyramid. I have cut and pasted the conclusion.Forbidden

From "Pyramidology" Book III, page 1129
by Dr. Adam Rutherford in Egypt, 1925,1950,1963,1964,1965"The figure of 5448.7360 PI is the height of the GP geometrically derived. Deduct the Rectification Factor multiplied by the tangent of the Pyramidic 'pi' angle (Casing angle). Expressed arithmetically:5813.0125-364.2765=5448.7360 PI"The Pyramid's summit platform therefore lies within the 5449th PI above the pavement level at the base and in the Bible this number is the identification number of Isaiah 19:19,20" END RUTHERFORD QUOTE.The Rectificaion Factor was explained in the preceding pages. I do not know how to communicate these multiple pages.

In the name of accuracy, your italics does not say what I actually said.

From: http://home.hiwaay.net/~jalison/30th.htmlUnlike the diagrams above, the earth is not perfectly spherical. It is slightly wider at the equator and slightly flattened at the poles. This is primarily due to the centrifugal force generated by the spin of the earth on it's axis. As a result, the curvature of the earth is greater towards the equator, and less towards the poles, causing the length of degrees of latitude to increase very slightly from the equator to the poles. The length of one degree of latitude from the equator to 1?/span> north is 68.71 miles. The length of one degree of latitude from 89?/span> north to the north pole is 69.4 miles. 68.71 miles is equal to 362776 feet, divided by sixty equals 6046 feet per minute of latitude, divided by two equals 3023 feet for one-half minute of latitude at the equator. This is the precise length of the perimeter of the Great Pyramid.With baselengths of 440 cubits per side, the perimeter of the Great Pyramid is 1,760 cubits long. The ancient Egyptian cubit equals one and a half ancient Egyptian feet. The 1,760 cubit perimeter of the Great Pyramid is 2,640 ancient Egyptian feet long. Since this distance equals one half of one minute of latitude at the equator, 5,280 ancient Egyptian feet (the same number of feet found in the English mile) equals the length of one minute of latitude at the equator.Petrie's measure of the Egyptian cubit was 20.62 inches ( .005 inches). Given a measure of 20.625 inches for the cubit, the ancient Egyptian foot was equal to 13.75 inches, or 1.1458 English feet. The equatorial diameter of the earth is 7,926 miles. A mile is 5,280 feet long, so 7,926 miles is 41,850,000 English feet long. Given an ancient Egyptian foot equal to 1.1458 English feet, the number of ancient Egyptian feet in the diameter of the earth may be calculated by dividing the number of English feet by 1.1458:41,850,000 ?1.1458 = 36,525,000 (ancient Egyptian feet in the equatorial diameter of the earth)There are 365.25 days in a year. The number of days in a year times 100,000 is 36,525,000.Degrees of longitude vary from a maximum length of 69.17 miles at the equator to zero miles at the poles. 69.17 miles is equal to 365,217 English feet, this is also a nearly exact expression of the number of days in a year, times 1,000.As shown by the Vesica Pisces diagrams, a degree of longitude at the 30th parallel is equal to a degree of longitude at the equator times the square root of three over two (.866):69.17 miles x .866 = 59.9 milesThe most current Global Positioning Survey data shows that one degree of longitude is exactly 60 miles long at 29.92?/span> north, in the immediate vicinity of Giza and the other pyramid fields just north of ancient Memphis. At this latitude, one minute of longitude is equal to one mile.A number of additional correspondences exist between the measures of the Great Pyramid in cubits and measures of the earth in miles. The equatorial circumference of the earth is 24,900 miles. The perimeter of the Great Pyramid is 1,760 cubits. 1,760 times the square root of two (1.4142) equals 2,490. The mean radius of the earth is 3,960 miles. The height of the Great Pyramid is 280 cubits. 280 times the square root of two equals 396. One half of the radius of the earth is 1,980 miles. The base lengths of the Great Pyramid at the height that the upper shafts exit the pyramid are 198 cubits. END LINK.