Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   PROOF OF GOD
DarkStar
Inactive Member


Message 397 of 739 (121930)
07-04-2004 9:57 PM
Reply to: Message 364 by Cold Foreign Object
07-02-2004 2:46 PM


Re: Post 345 is the Issue.
willowtree writes:
You have sacrificed objectivity in order to advance personal bias.
Bias at EvC?
Naw, couldn't be!
What makes you think that anyone clinging to that wonderful childhood fairytale, "The Myth of Macroevolution" could possibly be biased in any way?

"Religion without science might be blind but science without religion is lame!"
Albert Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 364 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-02-2004 2:46 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 398 by AdminNosy, posted 07-04-2004 11:39 PM DarkStar has replied
 Message 413 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-05-2004 9:21 PM DarkStar has not replied

DarkStar
Inactive Member


Message 399 of 739 (121962)
07-04-2004 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 398 by AdminNosy
07-04-2004 11:39 PM


Re: A "special" case in FFA
If there are other FAA topics you wish for me to avoid besides this one, please inform me of which ones they might include. Thanks in advance.

"Religion without science might be blind but science without religion is lame!"
Albert Einstein

This message is a reply to:
 Message 398 by AdminNosy, posted 07-04-2004 11:39 PM AdminNosy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 401 by AdminNosy, posted 07-04-2004 11:58 PM DarkStar has not replied

DarkStar
Inactive Member


Message 599 of 739 (125794)
07-19-2004 9:34 PM
Reply to: Message 593 by Cold Foreign Object
07-19-2004 6:13 PM


Shocking Revelation
After reading the suggested posts, I then started from the beginning of this thread, checked out the referenced sites, as well as some I found on my own, and all I can say is that this must be much more than mere coincidence.
I had never heard this argument about the pyramid before but now I must admit that if it is true, and the evidence that it is true seems overwhelming, I will have to re-examine the bible and re-evaluate this seemingly undeniable possibility that the bible is indeed the word of god, and that creation did indeed happen in the manner explained in the bible.
I have seen most of the evo's here offer excuse after excuse, still refusing to accept the evidence presented but as I stated in another post in another forum, "nothing in the bible that is shown to a determined non-believer will ever be able to convince them.....", which was a statement I made concerning the existance of confirmed scientific statements in the bible.
I said at the beginning that I would approach everything with an open mind, something your average evo is determined not to do. I, however, am not your average evo. Examination of the available evidence has already proven to me that the theory of macroevolution is nothing more than a myth, a fairytale for adults. Anyone who attempts to deny this is simply ignoring the evidence. Macroevolution never happened, is not happening now, and never will happen.
Quite possibly, further examination of the bible will further prove to me that it is the actual word of god, and that would be, for me at least, a shocking revelation and one that would necessitate a major shift in thinking when it comes to origins. I remain open to the challenge.
Cheers

The theory of evolution is a viable theory, absent the myth of macroevolution.
Once the myth of macroevolution is included, the viability of the theory of evolution vanishes as it slowly evolves into just another example of an implausible story,
nestled amongst the numerous fairytale's of our youth.-----DarkStar

This message is a reply to:
 Message 593 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-19-2004 6:13 PM Cold Foreign Object has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 600 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 07-20-2004 12:20 AM DarkStar has not replied

DarkStar
Inactive Member


Message 733 of 739 (130509)
08-04-2004 10:11 PM


So far the evidence is quite compelling!
Though I have not had the time necessary to thoroughly investigate the claims made in this thread, I must say that to this point, with the sites I have visited, both those offered here as well as a number of others, the evidence seems overwhelming in favor of WillowTree's initial assertions.
I have also noticed a small number of evo's play the runaround game here, to their own shame, while totally ignoring a substantial amount of material that has been offered up by WillowTree. While I am not yet to willing to totally concede to his initial claims, which are indeed supported by the evidence I have checked out thus far, I must reluctantly admit that there is alot more here that checks out than I thought there would be, so much so that I just can not, in good conscience, summarily dismissed it as erroneous, as I have seen others do.
I shall continue with my investigation, continually keeping an open mind, and shall not come to a final conclusion until I have exhausted all avenues available which may further support or challenge the initial claims made by WillowTree.
So says DarkStar.....The Truly Open-Minded Evo!

The theory of evolution is a viable theory, absent the myth of macroevolution.
Once the myth of macroevolution is included, the viability of the theory of evolution vanishes as it slowly evolves into just another example of an implausible story,
nestled amongst the numerous fairytale's of our youth.-----DarkStar

Replies to this message:
 Message 734 by NosyNed, posted 08-04-2004 10:36 PM DarkStar has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024