quote:
I lost all respect for Wyatt when he made the unforgivable "rookie" mistake of asserting that the blood of Christ must splatter the Mecry Seat on Earth. Every evangelical scholar agrees that the Holy of Holies typifies heaven and that Jesus delivered His blood to the propitiatory in heaven to be validated by the Father their. These immutable facts demonstrate an ignorance of Biblical facts by Wyatt which becomes the best evidence against his claim that he discovered the Ark underneath Mt. Moriah.
The best evidence for the location of the Ark places it in Ireland but that is another subject.
Please feel free to defend Wyatt - I am willing to listen, but remember that unless you got Bible to back your claims you have no claim. How could Wyatt claim the blood of Christ splattered the Ark when the Bible says via the O.T. dress rehearsal symbolism that the High Priest took the blood of the sacrifice from the Altar of Burnt Offering/Calvary and carried it into the Holy Holies ?
These facts evidently disprove Wyatt because his scenario has the blood dripping directly on the Ark hidden beneath the ground.
I don't have time to get into it, but I think the only reason why you have lost respect for Wyatt is because you really don't understand what Wyatt believes on this subject. Have you read all the doctrines in relation to the blood falling on the Mercy Seat? After reading countless Bible studies on this subject, I'm more convinced than ever that the blood falling on the Mercy Seat is in harmony with true Biblical doctrine. To me it is premature to lose respect in a man simply for a difference on doctrinal matters when it comes to archaeology. His discoveries have gained respect around the world from various demoninations that are not SDA.
In answer to your questions regarding the blood, I will email you some links.
quote:
Because that date has been independantly determined via incontrovertible astronomical data fixed by the Great Pyramid on the Giza Plateau.
With the date so determined, a date which is only 7 years apart from the Biblically accepted date - these facts corroborate each other. The only outstanding issue is to compile a Biblical chronology. This chronology has been vigorously debated for centuries. The GP establishes the 15th century to be a fact. It also establishes that every date other than 1453 BC to be incorrect. The strength of 1453 BC is the way the GP determines the date - a method that requires no reliability upon a human being/fallible biased source.
I promised the topic author I would not argue this evidence unless of course he decides to break silence. If you really want to know just email me at: pyramidial@yahoo.com and I will supply you with links that will blow your mind !
I realize that my opponents completely disagree. Please feel free to get your equal time as I will let you have the last word concerning the GP.
By all means, email me the links. I will email you first, and then you can email me back. However, be rest assured that I am not all that motivated to debate a subject with only 7 years difference. Like I stated, we believe there are a few years uncertainty with the 1446 BC dating. You seem to be much more certain in your 1453 than I am in my 1446. Nonetheless, it's good to know that a 1453 BC dating does not negate the chariot wheel discoveries at the bottom of Aqaba across Nuweiba.
~Lysimachus
I have a small limp once in a while (only in the sense that I tend to favor it when I'm not thinking about it), but that is leaving quickly. Once in a while I'll take only one Hydrocrodon at night just to relax my leg, but that should quit anytime now. 
™ Version 4.2