Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Could the US become a theocracy ?
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 29 of 120 (166182)
12-08-2004 8:59 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by MangyTiger
12-08-2004 2:45 AM


Yes, I think it is a real danger, and I think if it happens it will not happen in a "bloody coup", but slowly and gradually.
In fact, I think that we have been moving that way ever since Reagan made a lot of political hay from courting the extremeist Christian right.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by MangyTiger, posted 12-08-2004 2:45 AM MangyTiger has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 31 of 120 (166184)
12-08-2004 9:07 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Phat
12-08-2004 4:51 AM


The ACLU recently defended JERRY FALWELL in a case, even though he has expressed his seething haterd for that organization on many occasions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Phat, posted 12-08-2004 4:51 AM Phat has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 32 of 120 (166186)
12-08-2004 9:10 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Silent H
12-08-2004 6:06 AM


quote:
Ever read the Handmaid's Tale? It wasn't quite so simple, but exteremely disturbing.
I read it a long time ago. I have thought of it often over the last 4 years.
We are so close to that being a reality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Silent H, posted 12-08-2004 6:06 AM Silent H has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 33 of 120 (166189)
12-08-2004 9:16 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Phat
12-08-2004 6:20 AM


Re: Theocratic means absolute standards
quote:
I also see the need for some absolute authority to restrict things that can destroy a country.
That you seem to really believe this is quite frightening to me.
It is the attitude that allows a steady slide into facism and the end of liberty and freedom and our very way of life here in America.
You are expressing very, very un-American attitudes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Phat, posted 12-08-2004 6:20 AM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Phat, posted 12-08-2004 12:37 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 41 of 120 (166291)
12-08-2004 4:06 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Phat
12-08-2004 12:37 PM


Re: Theocratic means absolute standards
You are expressing very, very un-American attitudes.
quote:
Not at all. I am just expressing the opposite end of the political spectrum than you are.
The Founders were quite emphatic in leaving any kind of "moral absolutes" out of our constitution in particular and out of the realm of government interference in general.
You are correct that you are expressing the far right political view, which is facist or dictatorial, but my point is that this view is very, very un-American.
If the founders were alive today they would be horrified by your idea that the government should be imposing moral absolutes to the extent you suggest.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Phat, posted 12-08-2004 12:37 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Phat, posted 12-08-2004 4:27 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 66 of 120 (166497)
12-09-2004 9:20 AM
Reply to: Message 42 by Phat
12-08-2004 4:27 PM


Re: Theocratic means absolute standards
quote:
Don't be so sure what they would express horror at. They may look around and see how society has changed. They may get to view some movies and T.V.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, there, phat!
If you have a problem with movies and TV, then I'm afraid that you have a problem with capitalsism, not the system of government that our founders set up.
You have lots and lots of control over what you watch on TV for free and what you pay to see in the movie theaters. If you don't like it, you turn the TV off and you don't go see those movies.
I think that the Founders would be horrified by the following:
1)The low percentage of the eligable population that votes.
2)The way the press has become nothing more than a sensationalistic money-making entertainment enterprise instead of a way to investigate issues and government to help citizens learn the truth.
3)the erosion of our civil liberties.
quote:
They may get to dee the issues that would never have been understood or accepted by folks in their day. They would be horrified, allright, but it would not be because of the religious conservatives.
Yes, they absolutely would have been horrified by religion gaining power into the American government like it has.
Remember, those men were products of the Rationalist movement. Several of them were quite anti religion.
Please pay special attention to the Jefferson quotes I have bolded.
"I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved--the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!"--John Adams in a letter to Thomas Jefferson
"Religion I found to be without any tendency to inspire, promote, or confirm morality, serves principally to divide us and make us unfriendly to one another."--Benjamin Franklin
"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical."--Thomas Jefferson, _Statute_for_Religious_Freedom_, 1779, _The_Papers_of_Thomas_Jefferson_, edited by Julron P. Boyd, 1950, 2:545
"History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance, of which their political as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purpose."--Thomas Jefferson to Baron von Humboldt in 1813, _The_Writings_of_Thomas_Jefferson_Memorial_Edition_, edited by Lipscomb and Bergh, 14:21
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 12-09-2004 09:50 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Phat, posted 12-08-2004 4:27 PM Phat has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 67 of 120 (166498)
12-09-2004 9:26 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Silent H
12-08-2004 5:23 PM


Re: Theocratic means absolute standards
quote:
not to mention having to leave the building to smoke at all.
quote:
Its what we can't do, or must do, in the name of "security" and "create a decent society" that would shock the hell out of them.
Of course, once we told them that medical science has advanced so that we now understand that second hand smoke is injurious to others besides the smoker, I am sure they would understand their need to smoke away from others.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Silent H, posted 12-08-2004 5:23 PM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Silent H, posted 12-09-2004 7:34 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 68 of 120 (166499)
12-09-2004 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Mammuthus
12-09-2004 3:21 AM


quote:
They banned headscarves, the crucifix, yamulka's and any other religious symbols being worn by state employees while performing their government functions.
Didn't they ban headscarves for children at school? And did they ban the other religious symbols at school, too? I had only heard about the headscarves and thought that if they were singling out the muslims it was wrong.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Mammuthus, posted 12-09-2004 3:21 AM Mammuthus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Mammuthus, posted 12-09-2004 9:43 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 72 of 120 (166504)
12-09-2004 9:56 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by Mammuthus
12-09-2004 9:43 AM


quote:
The French banned everything...not just islamic symbols. The Germans are targetting Islam exclusively.
I think it's wrong to ban headscarves and other religious gear or symbols which are required by a person's religion.
This ban favors Christians and other religions that don't have such a requirement in their tennets.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Mammuthus, posted 12-09-2004 9:43 AM Mammuthus has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 74 of 120 (166641)
12-09-2004 5:51 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Phat
12-09-2004 12:39 PM


Re: Theocratic means absolute standards
I'd appreciate a reply to message #66, please.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Phat, posted 12-09-2004 12:39 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Phat, posted 12-09-2004 6:04 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 86 of 120 (166913)
12-10-2004 9:15 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Silent H
12-09-2004 7:34 PM


Re: Theocratic means absolute standards
OK, if you want to dismiss the findings of over 30 studies and the opinion of the EPA, the US Surgeon General, the National Academy of Sciences, and the National Cancer institute, be my guest.
404 Error - American College of Chest Physicians
Environmental Exposures Before and After Birth
Can Harm Children's Lungs
Asthma Symptoms in Infants Caused by Combustion Pollutants
and Tobacco Smoke
(NORTHBROOK, IL, October 11, 2004) — Children prenatally exposed to pollutants, such as motor vehicle exhaust, and postnatally exposed to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) may be more likely to suffer from asthma and related symptoms early in life. A new study in the October issue of CHEST, the peer-reviewed journal of the American College of Chest Physicians, shows that young children who are exposed to these pollutants may be significantly more likely to develop respiratory conditions at ages 12 and 24 months.
"A great deal of new evidence suggests that the respiratory system may be vulnerable to damage caused by inhaled environmental agents during the prenatal period," said Rachel L. Miller, MD, the study's lead author at the Columbia Center for Children's Environmental Health, part of the Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY.
"This study indicates that the combination of exposure to combustion by-products in the womb and to second-hand smoke during infancy can cause significantly more respiratory problems than either exposure on its own," added Dr. Frederica Perera, the study's Principal Investigator and Director of the Center.
http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/10_18.htm
Health Effects Associated With ETS Exposure
In 1986, two landmark reports were published on the association between ETS exposure and the adverse health effects in nonsmokers: one by the U.S. Surgeon General and the other by the Expert Committee on Passive Smoking, National Academy of Sciences' National Research Council (NAS/NRC). Both of these reports concluded that:
ETS can cause lung cancer in healthy adult nonsmokers;
Children of parents who smoke have more respiratory symptoms and acute lower respiratory tract infections, as well as evidence of reduced lung function, than do children of nonsmoking parents; and
Separating smokers and nonsmokers within the same air space may reduce but does not eliminate a nonsmoker's exposure to ETS.
In 1992, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) confirmed the above findings in its study on the respiratory health effects of ETS. In addition, the EPA classified ETS as a Group A carcinogena category reserved only for the most dangerous cancer-causing agents in humans. The EPA report, a compilation of 30 epidemiological studies that focused on the health risks of nonsmokers with smoking spouses, concluded that there is a strong association between ETS exposure and lung cancer. Scientists estimate that ETS is responsible for approximately 3,000 lung cancer deaths per year among nonsmokers in the United States. Recent studies and the EPA's report point to a 20—percent increased risk of lung cancer in nonsmokers due to ETS.
This message has been edited by schrafinator, 12-10-2004 09:16 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Silent H, posted 12-09-2004 7:34 PM Silent H has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 87 of 120 (166916)
12-10-2004 9:27 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by Phat
12-09-2004 6:04 PM


Re: Thomas Jefferson--
quote:
It does not not mean that I don't think that my kids AND your kids need Jesus, however.
You are free to think this, just as I am free to think that my kids AND your kids need to never blindly believe anything just because it makes them feel good.
However, it's not unbelievers like me trying to get control of the government in order to get a philosophy like mine instilled as doctrine that everyone must follow.
It is believers in your religion who are trying to get control of the government to force me to follow YOUR beliefs and YOUR religion.
I am happy to live and let live.
Your side is not content to leave me and mine the heck alone.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by Phat, posted 12-09-2004 6:04 PM Phat has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 91 by Phat, posted 12-10-2004 10:00 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 88 of 120 (166920)
12-10-2004 9:37 AM
Reply to: Message 76 by Silent H
12-09-2004 7:34 PM


Re: Theocratic means absolute standards
quote:
The new freedom which is:" I should be able to go anywhere I want and not be offended... or put at risk... by behaviors that the owners and other patrons might like" is not freedom.
Do you think that smoking should be allowed in the workplace, in office buildings?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Silent H, posted 12-09-2004 7:34 PM Silent H has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by AdminJar, posted 12-10-2004 9:41 AM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 90 of 120 (166924)
12-10-2004 9:47 AM
Reply to: Message 89 by AdminJar
12-10-2004 9:41 AM


Re: Schraf & holmes
OK, but he started it.
(pouts sullenly)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by AdminJar, posted 12-10-2004 9:41 AM AdminJar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by Silent H, posted 12-11-2004 5:38 PM nator has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2200 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 95 of 120 (167013)
12-10-2004 4:33 PM
Reply to: Message 91 by Phat
12-10-2004 10:00 AM


Re: Theocrats, Democrats, and
quote:
Your family lives in a small town. The voting block changes, as single factory workers move into the area. They vote to allow bars, liquor stores, ghambling, porn shops, and as an addition, drugs become rampant.
I notice that you mention nothing about crime.
If crime levels stay low, what's the problem?
quote:
You cannot afford to move.
I would be in favor of legislating morality with a block of like minded families. What would you do?
I would never want to dictate to someone else, by law, their morals.
It is impossible anyway. People's morals are their own.
If there was no increase in crime, I probably wouldn't do anything.
quote:
BTW, your teenagers are getting more unruly because of the forbidden thrills available in town. They always listened to you, however, until this new temptation.
If your teenagers run wild because of bars and gambling suddenly being around, then you did a terrible job of instilling your values into them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Phat, posted 12-10-2004 10:00 AM Phat has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024