Thanks Brad. I'm glad of your interest, and it's good to hear from you.
Pink S writes:
You are making some kind of assumption that in order for the food chain to exist as it is now, it must have been originally set up that way - this is simply not the case.
That's a big strawman. As said the food chain could adapt that by one specie dying off, God would replace the animal into the available space, so the food chain would evolve but not the organisms. Call it equivocating a baramin,
And he is assuming that because he sees speciation today, they've always been speciating even from abiogenesis, while also assuming Abiogenesis is true.
If the first species was able to happen, then why would it need to speciate? Why would it adapt beyond it's baramin category? Ofcourse - none do observably. From niche to niche or from nil to nil I think I will choose a designer. The mind is there anyway! Food chains can't just happen, one part (species) of the sytem will always need his counterpart. Do u agrre/disagree Brad?