Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,918 Year: 4,175/9,624 Month: 1,046/974 Week: 5/368 Day: 5/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Gay Marriage Immoral?
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6384 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 11 of 134 (331997)
07-15-2006 2:54 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by crashfrog
07-15-2006 1:28 PM


Definition and use of GBS
I found the original definition of GBS from 1976 in Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science.
If it's not:
1) A refereed medical journal article
2) A physicians diagnostic reference with citations
don't bother.
Very strictly speaking I don't think it satisfies either of your criteria, but it is still a valid source IMO (see here for a full description of the publication).
If you put GBS into the search facility of PubMed you get 25 results, 20 of which are from the 80s, 3 from the 90s and 2 from the 2000s - which possibly suggests the term is falling out of fashion.
I found an article in The Washington Blade (Washington D.C. magazine for gays) which states that the CDC used to use the term but doesn't anymore.
An official with the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention said LGV is not “gay bowel syndrome.” The rare chlamydia strain has been around since the 1970s, and may have once been considered among the various diseases doctors loosely referred to as “gay bowel syndrome,” according to Jessica Frickey, a spokesperson for the federal health agency.
But it’s difficult for the CDC to know ”let alone track ” which diseases used to be included in “gay bowel syndrome” because the term was so informal and has since gone out of use at the CDC, Frickey said.
One of the articles listed in PubMed is from the Journal Of Homosexuality (which is a peer-reviewed publication) has this abstract:
Ohio State University, USA.
In 1976, a group of physicians in private proctologic practice in New York City coined the illness "Gay Bowel Syndrome" in reference to a constellation of gay male anorectal disorders. Through analysis of biomedical discourse and popular media, it is apparent that Gay Bowel Syndrome is an essentialized category of difference that is neither gay-specific, confined to the bowel, nor a syndrome. The use and diagnosis of Gay Bowel Syndrome must be abandoned before it further lends itself to the formation of social policies and governing practices that seek to force gay male bodies into positions of social, cultural, and political subordination.
So in summary I'd say Gay Bowel Syndrome was once in relatively common use in the medical profession but is on the way out.

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by crashfrog, posted 07-15-2006 1:28 PM crashfrog has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by nwr, posted 07-15-2006 2:57 PM MangyTiger has replied
 Message 20 by ReverendDG, posted 07-16-2006 12:59 AM MangyTiger has not replied

  
MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6384 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 14 of 134 (332003)
07-15-2006 3:07 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by nwr
07-15-2006 2:57 PM


Re: Definition and use of GBS
You have to feel a bit sorry for George Bernard Shaw (GBS), having a disease named after him
Yeah, but not as sorry as for Lou Gehrig. I mean, what are the odds of getting a disease that's got the same name as you? Biological version of 'somewhere there's a bullet with your name on' perhaps

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by nwr, posted 07-15-2006 2:57 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by MUTTY6969, posted 07-16-2006 3:05 AM MangyTiger has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024