Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What is your best arguments against a world wide flood.
edge
Member (Idle past 1736 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 10 of 47 (36757)
04-11-2003 2:08 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Convince-me
04-10-2003 9:33 AM


quote:
And what is the explanation to Grand Canyon. It doesnt look like the river of Grand canyon have deposited the layers.
Who said that it did?
quote:
The layers are spread many many miles, the same stonesize lie with eachother.
Yep, just like modern depositional environments.
quote:
It looks like great waves have deposited them. The river is rather created by an initial crack.
You'll have to clear this with your favorite professional creationist. According to many, there were no cracks in the soft sediment of the GC sequence.
quote:
What about polystrata fossils and massive fossilgraves and the oil.
What about them? Do you really think that geologists haven't thought about these things? That they were discovered by creationists?
quote:
You can argue that its AT LEAST large local catastrophies and not slow burying.
Large local catastophes do not help you. They are still local. There are still many of them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Convince-me, posted 04-10-2003 9:33 AM Convince-me has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024