What is your best arguments against a world wide flood.

Okay, but if there was no evidence of a flood, why do we have 1 third of the Himalayas covered with seashells?
Why was a whale's skeleton found on a 3000-foot mountaintop?
Why was Pillow Lava Found on a 15000-foot mountain (pillow lava forms ONLY underwater)?
Study astronomy and geology: the earth is tilted on its axis. However, stonehenge and the Ramses star-map of Egypt do not line up well as how they should. In fact, if you mapped out how the earth's axis is 'wobbly' you'll find that it is behaving like a spinning top that was struck forcefully about 4.5 thousand years ago (4500 y.a.) That is about the same time as the flood of Noah, according to the Bible. Interesting.The Smithsonian is responsible for hiding much evidence that goes against evolution, so i've heard (that sounds bias on their part). Many musuems I have BEEN TO will hide the fact that there exist polystrate fossils and human remains that were found "out of place" in the geologic column. Seriously, the only place that the geologic column really exists is in the textbook (much of the fossils found in the rock layers do not 'support' their theory, so they simply disregard the evidence for the flood).
Do not believe that there is NO evidence for the flood--there is more evidence FOR it... but evolutionists, from my experience, are very good at covering up or making you believe there is no evidence.Here are my sources, for the skeptics out there:Dr. Comninellis, Nichollas "Creative Defense: Evidence AGAINST Evolution" Dinosaur Adventure Land http://www.projectcreation.orgEvolution-Facts | Fakta & Evolusi Ilmiah

Actually, The whale's skeleton was unearthed atop Sanhorn Mountain in the North Sea (an area not known to be affected by shifting plates to the point of 3000 feet of uplift).Also, It is difficult to tell what kind of sea shells are atop the Himalayas (they are fossilized). HOWEVER, being fossilized does not prove they are millions of years old. I have, in my basement, a piece of petrified wood that was recently hand-carved (it was normal wood not too long ago). Also, the logs in Spirit Lake (I've been to Washington myself) are already beginning to petrify (they are not even three decades old and left over from Mt. St. Helens).
So, the sea shells found at Mt. Everest are, I believe, oysters (for some of the sea shells are several feet wide, and oysters are known to grow larger than most clams and mussels).

Why on earth should it matter WHAT KIND of seashells they are.One thing I've noticed is that evolutionists are quite good at getting people to focus on the wrong part of the discussion. (Is that how you go about making fools of creationists--by ignoring their real evidence and just going to what isn't important)???

Bill, you are focusing on the wrong part of the argument (where was the mountain)?Sorry, it was a miscommunication of where the mountain was that boasted a whale and where the mountain was that had the other flood-evidence (i.e. corral).
The mountain that really had a whale (((SANHORN MOUNTAIN))) is in Michigan. THe mountain with the researchers' findings of other such evidence is in the mountain range Timor (I'm not familiar yet with that area, but I know now that Sanhorn , not Sandhornet, is in Michigan, along glacial deposits where ONLY a deluge "flood" could have caused the location of the whale's skeleton).
If you want more, get a hold of Dr. Comninellis' book "Creative Defense: Evidence AGAINST Evolution"
If you want to know more about the flood evidence (including a mere mention of Sanhorn and the whale) then go to yahoo.com, type in Sanhorn Mountain, and click on "God created the universe."
In Christ,
Booboo

You're getting off the subject.Also, I've noticed that you often quote from Talkorigins.
Do you have ANY idea how bias they are?
No, I mentioned "God created the Universe" not "did God create the universe" YOU ARE THE ONE who made the mistake--look further. Besides, what does the first four letters have to do with it anyway?Anyway, talkorigins is VERY bias (i typed up a letter and sent it to them, showing a few minor details they messed up on, like the law of increasing entropy). THEY didnt even acknowledge me. (THE NEVER CALLED, THEY NEVER EMAILED ME, AND THEY DIDNT EVEN POST IT IN THE FAQ's section).
Don't quote EVERYTHING from one site just because you like their opinion on the matter.