Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Problems with Genesis Creation
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2522 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 141 of 173 (397297)
04-25-2007 12:11 PM
Reply to: Message 140 by jjsemsch
04-25-2007 11:31 AM


Re: Message 66: 2 of 5
You don’t need a change in the density of water for this to happen.
Like a good Fundy, you've once again answered a question I didn't ask.
You need variable density and highly organized water molecules so that only dinosaurs get deposited with dinosaurs and only megafauna get desposited with megafauna.
Now, before you answer with another giant cut and paste - here's some facts.
Small dinosaurs, including juvenile dinos, are buried with their contemperaries, not with animals of similiar size.
Dinos and Megafauna appear in verticle strata. It's not like all dinos are in nevada and all megafauna are in New jersey. These aren't animals that lived in different areas.
Now onto your ridiculous post:
You honestly believe that plants have the same fossilization rate as bones? You realize that plants are made out of different materials than bones, hopefully. If not, you may want to look it up.
This is just another example of the evil people at AiG either deliberately lying or simply being stupid.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 140 by jjsemsch, posted 04-25-2007 11:31 AM jjsemsch has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2522 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 146 of 173 (397337)
04-25-2007 2:39 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by jjsemsch
04-25-2007 2:04 PM


Re: Message 66: 3 of 5
Okay stop.
JJ you don't _actually_ believe this, do you?
In order for your theory to work, all of the lands were flattened (which there's no record of, and is not mentioned in the Bible) then all the mountains reformed right after the flood.
Come on.
At some point you have to look at the pile of bullshit that you are stacking up and say, "What the hell am I saying?"
Exactly how many magic events had to take place in a row in order for your theory to be correct? 20? 50?
I'm starting to feel like I'm arguing with a child about why the toothfairy doesn't exist.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by jjsemsch, posted 04-25-2007 2:04 PM jjsemsch has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2522 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 147 of 173 (397339)
04-25-2007 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by jjsemsch
04-25-2007 2:38 PM


Re: Message 66: 4 & 5 of 5
stop stop stop, my sides hurt too much from laughing.
So, let's see if we can sum up.
In order for you to be right -
Volcanos erupted while simulateously being flattened along with the rest of the world so that it could fill in the trenches at the bottom of the ocean while the Earth's temperature went up to melt the ice caps. But while the temperature went up, there was less evaporation because we need all the water on the ground. Then, right after the flood, all the land which was not at the bottom of the ocean came back out of those deep trenches and formed the mountains. Of course, since all that land was sedimentary by definition, the mountains are all sedimentary except for the onces with aren't because they magically changed. Meanwhile, the mountains which were not flattened were magically still around for Noah to land his boat on, and as the waters drained in Arizona they cut the Grand Canyon, but in the rest of the world, they drained out without creating equal or larger canyons, meanwhile the animals spread out as the mountains were rising up around them and fed on the plants which didn't die in the salt water, except for those carnivores which didn't feed on anything apparently but were magically sustained. While this was happening, somehow all the kangaroos got to australia and all the turkeys got to North America, along with the megafaunal which survived this extremely warm period so that they could thrive in the Ice age which immediately followed the flood. And, while all this was going on, the various animals stratified themselves along with plants so that the most primative ones landed at places where C-14 dating was corrupted to make them appear older, while the later forms landed in places where the C-14 was corrupted to make them appear older, but not quite as old as the other ones.
Yup, this all makes perfect sense. I'm surprised we don't teach it in school along side the "Magic of Math" and the "Magic of Spanish"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by jjsemsch, posted 04-25-2007 2:38 PM jjsemsch has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2522 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 162 of 173 (397456)
04-26-2007 12:45 AM
Reply to: Message 161 by catman62@bellsouth.net
04-25-2007 10:04 PM


Re: quoting the bible genisis
Catman, welcome to the boards.
I am not responding to your points, because frankly I can't make heads or tails of your responses.
If you are responding to someone in particular use the "reply" button on their message so we know who you are talking to, rather than "general reply"
Also, check out the "peek" function for handy code on how to
put stuff in boxes
so we can see what part of the text you are responding to.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 161 by catman62@bellsouth.net, posted 04-25-2007 10:04 PM catman62@bellsouth.net has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 164 by catman62@bellsouth.net, posted 04-26-2007 10:04 AM Nuggin has not replied
 Message 165 by catman62@bellsouth.net, posted 04-26-2007 10:06 AM Nuggin has not replied

  
Nuggin
Member (Idle past 2522 days)
Posts: 2965
From: Los Angeles, CA USA
Joined: 08-09-2005


Message 168 of 173 (397545)
04-26-2007 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by catman62@bellsouth.net
04-26-2007 1:31 PM


Re: My top 20: 19 of 20
Straight up question:
Catman, do you speak English? Because the nature of your responses leads me to believe that you are simply cutting and pasting some text from someplace. You address neither the posts you are responding to, nor make points of your own.
What's the deal?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by catman62@bellsouth.net, posted 04-26-2007 1:31 PM catman62@bellsouth.net has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 169 by obvious Child, posted 04-26-2007 2:40 PM Nuggin has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024