The comparison of gay sex to rape is crystal clear. If it isn't clear to you, then just what do you think that moralizing bastard was talking about?
The general philosophy for those who maintain a secular worldview believe in
"live and let live." That means, let me believe in whatever I want to, and let me do whatever I want to do, so long as I don't hurt anybody.
Taz basically said that gay sex doesn't hurt him. So I made the comment that just because he hasn't personally been raped, does that mean rape isn't wrong?
One had nothing to do with the other. It had everything to do with his methodology.
This is a long-standing pattern with nemjug, going back much further than even his comparison of gays to animals last year
No it isn't. The only one whoever really understood what I was getting at was Holmes, who was an atheist, pro-gay, pro-abortion guy-- hardly someone who would advocate for me unless he understood what I was saying.
I'm not saying, nor have I ever said, that homosexuals are exactly like pedophiles or zoophiles. My reason for mentioning it so that you can understand my position better. If you say that homosexuality is good, but pedophilia is bad, while maintaining a morally relativistic view, you commit debate suicide. I just want you to be aware of that.
This is the millionth time that I've gone over it. I suspect that you know exactly what I'm talking about, but you can't really defend your position so its easier for you to just chime in with name calling-- which is traditionally what people resort to when they're losing a debate. You make the inference.
I should think anyone of even the meanest intelligence, if not "washed in the blood of jesus" or what the fuck ever, would be able to detect nemjug's condescending and patronizing attitude toward anyone, and especially gays, who do not share his narrow-minded and unabashedly bigoted world-view.
You do realize how oxymoronic it is to say that I have a narrow-minded worldview while not believing in any moral absolutes, right? It all boils down to opinion. So why would my opinion be viewed more narrowly than yours? Think deeply about it Berberry. The answer is staring you in the face. You can call it condescending if you want. I call it reasonable.
"The problem of Christianity is not that it has been tried and found wanting, but that it is difficult and left untried" -G.K. Chesterton