Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Holistic Doctors, and medicine
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 196 of 304 (418784)
08-30-2007 10:06 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by nator
08-29-2007 6:43 PM


Re: Testing Testing
quote:
I know that there are no laws to prevent pseudoscience and quackery in "natural healing" methods, for the most part, but what I am interested in exploring is how you can embrace such unscientific concepts and yet claim that you haven't abandoned science, evidence, and reason.
As I said in Message 176 my dealings with CAM concern nutrition. (My MD has approved what I'm doing) (I know she's lost all sense also.) I can't make an all encompassing statement. There are too many variables. I can't account for every single concept.
As you said: ...you do as much research as you can on your particular problem(s), and you see how they are to work with, and if what they do and advise you to do works.
And I said in Message 176: What my ND has advised me to date concerning nutrition has worked. I can't speak to anything else.
Whether you like it or not, money and politics have a part in this issue. If every single treatment or concept that hasn't gone through rigorous scientific testing, is banned; where is the incentive to get it tested.
In the US we function on competition. So not only do we need to cut through what is true quackery, but we have to cut through what is propaganda. As my husband likes to say: Numbers don't lie, but liars use numbers. It is still a game of money and politics.
quote:
Lastly, are you actually claiming that "biological homeostaisis" is what Naturopaths really mean when they say "balance"?
Can you provide a link to a Naturopathic source that makes clear that this is what they mean?
I doubt I will find a site with those exact words on a definition page, mainly because those pages are written to entice a general populace. It is advertisement.
In Message 194 from my ND's pamphlet:
Naturopathic doctors emphasize food and nutrition, vitamins and minerals, herbs and similar substances and some forms of physical medicine in their clinical approach. Naturopathic doctors strive to create an environment where balance can be restored.
You wanted to know what is meant by balance. Biological homeostasis is what I understand my ND to mean by balance. Again, I can't account for every ND.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by nator, posted 08-29-2007 6:43 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 12:06 PM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 209 by nator, posted 08-30-2007 9:44 PM purpledawn has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 197 of 304 (418796)
08-30-2007 11:07 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by nator
08-29-2007 6:51 PM


Re: Poor Poor Pitiful Me
quote:
Sure, he's also been exposed to all he needs. He doesn't choose to use his bullshit detector either, just like you.
You are saying that you shouldn't be expected to use critical thinking skills when evaluating the claims of Naturopathy just because an MD doesn't use them either.
One complaint against NDs is the lack of training. MDs on the other hand have very rigorous training. You want me to believe that someone with all that rigorous training just decided to stop using his critical thinking skills, which should be part of his trade. Disagreeing with the status quo is not uncommon and is sometimes fruitful.
I would more readily believe that the MD with his own line or book knows exactly what he's doing and is just jumping on the gravy train. He knows exactly how to word science to keep from getting in trouble.
There are MDs who have added naturopathy to their training. Does that mean they find every concept viable, I don't know. Maybe, maybe not, but it doesn't prevent the MD from using that which he considers viable given his training and experience.
I don't buy that MDs that support natural just had a brain fart. I also don't consider it reasonable to judge that I don't use critical thinking skills when dealing with nutrition. I haven't advocated that all treatments or concepts are acceptable to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by nator, posted 08-29-2007 6:51 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 200 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 12:29 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 211 by nator, posted 08-30-2007 10:31 PM purpledawn has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 198 of 304 (418811)
08-30-2007 12:05 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by purpledawn
08-30-2007 8:59 AM


Actually it is the NCCAM definition.
The NCCAM is part of the NIH.
And the NIH is part of HHS.
Posting all 3 links is redundant.
Don't play stupid, purple.
purple writes:
A truly untested treatment no, but to me a truly untested treatment means it has never been used on humans.
Untested = never used on humans. Therefore, tested = used on humans. Therefore bloodletting for fever = tested.
I haven't claimed that it was. What is your point?
Of the FIVE studies NIH is conducting, 3 are dietary approaches and 2 are looking into active ingredient efficacy. Of the hundreds and hundreds of horseshit "remedies", the fact that the NIH has chosen only 5 speaks volumes.
(Watch. purple's gonna say "Oh, it's just the beginning. We have to wait and see." or "Big Pharma won't let them.")
Legitimate medical practitioners have been researching, and using, both these approaches for nearly a century. The NIH has chosen to highlight these 5 to placate the woo monkeys.
I can't even begin to count the number of drugs derived from natural sources!
Oh. You never answered my question re: efficacy of active ingredient v. whole herb.
And finally, from your quote:
But we should make public policy decisions based on the standards of practice that are being taught, not on our opinions about individual practitioners. Judging by the standards of practice presented in the Textbook, it seems clear that the risks to many sick patients seeking care from the average naturopathic practitioner would far outweigh any possible benefits.
Good christ. You consider this an endorsement???

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 8:59 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 1:42 PM molbiogirl has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 199 of 304 (418812)
08-30-2007 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by purpledawn
08-30-2007 10:06 AM


Re: Testing Testing
Whether you like it or not, money and politics have a part in this issue. If every single treatment or concept that hasn't gone through rigorous scientific testing, is banned; where is the incentive to get it tested.
Did I tell you or did I tell you. purple posted this while I was composing my answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 10:06 AM purpledawn has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 200 of 304 (418815)
08-30-2007 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 197 by purpledawn
08-30-2007 11:07 AM


Re: Poor Poor Pitiful Me
I don't buy that MDs that support natural just had a brain fart.
There are many well-trained professionals who profess delusional beliefs. Those that believe in ghosts, for example. Or the mathematicians and engineers who deny evolution.
I doubt I will find a site with those exact words on a definition page, mainly because those pages are written to entice a general populace.
There's a darn good reason why you won't find "homeostasis" in any ND literature. There's also a darn good reason why I could find, in less than 30 seconds, 3 "definitions" of naturopathy that were full of the worst kind of pseudo science Message 185.
The "authoritative" "text" of naturopaths spouts pseudo sciencetific woo!
The leading "school" spouts pseudo sciencetific woo!
And the overwhelming majority of naturopaths spout pseudo scientific woo.
And I said in Message 176: What my ND has advised me to date concerning nutrition has worked. I can't speak to anything else.
Anecdotal "evidence" is not evidence. For the umpteenth time.
Edited by molbiogirl, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 197 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 11:07 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 202 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 2:07 PM molbiogirl has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 201 of 304 (418832)
08-30-2007 1:42 PM
Reply to: Message 198 by molbiogirl
08-30-2007 12:05 PM


Redundance
quote:
The NCCAM is part of the NIH.
And the NIH is part of HHS.
Posting all 3 links is redundant.
And HHS is a part of the U.S. Government, but it isn't accurate for me to state that the quote is from the U.S. Government.
Listing all three is actually a courtesy.
quote:
Untested = never used on humans. Therefore, tested = used on humans. Therefore bloodletting for fever = tested.
That's not the same as:
molbiogirl writes:
Message 185...By that definition, blood letting is an appropriate treatment for fever.
quote:
Oh. You never answered my question re: efficacy of active ingredient v. whole herb.
Oh, Message 192!
quote:
Good christ. You consider this an endorsement???
What do you think my position is anyway?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 198 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 12:05 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 203 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 3:16 PM purpledawn has replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 202 of 304 (418836)
08-30-2007 2:07 PM
Reply to: Message 200 by molbiogirl
08-30-2007 12:29 PM


Re: Poor Poor Pitiful Me
quote:
There are many well-trained professionals who profess delusional beliefs. Those that believe in ghosts, for example. Or the mathematicians and engineers who deny evolution.
But the examples you're giving are outside their professional training. A medical doctor dealing with disease is not outside his professional training.
I really don't understand what your point is with all the woo listing in relation to what I posted. Do feel balance has another definition? As I said in Message 196: Biological homeostasis is what I understand my ND to mean by balance. Again, I can't account for every ND.
quote:
Anecdotal "evidence" is not evidence. For the umpteenth time.
I didn't say that it was evidence concerning Naturopathy in general; but if you keep the statement in context (Message 196), you'll see that I was commenting concerning my personal situation and nator's instructions: you do as much research as you can on your particular problem(s), and you see how they are to work with, and if what they do and advise you to do works.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 200 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 12:29 PM molbiogirl has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 212 by nator, posted 08-30-2007 10:47 PM purpledawn has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 203 of 304 (418840)
08-30-2007 3:16 PM
Reply to: Message 201 by purpledawn
08-30-2007 1:42 PM


nator's statement:
Are you saying that untested treatments have their place alongside tested treatments in healthcare?
Your response:
A truly untested treatment no, but to me a truly untested treatment means it has never been used on humans.
My response:
That is a truly bizarre definition of "untested". By that definition, blood letting is an appropriate treatment for fever.
Your response translated:
Tested "treatments" have their place alongside proper medical treatment. Anything that has been used on humans is tested.
My response translated:
Bloodletting for fever has been used on humans. Therefore bloodletting for fever has been tested. Therefore bloodletting for fever has its place alongside proper medical treatment.
From Message 192
The difference is that my statement makes no claim that the different results are more or less effective, just different.
The intent of my question (efficacy v. whole herb) is to get at just that: What on god's green earth do you mean by "different"?
Show me quantitative data. Provide a link. Point to an authoritative text. Don't just wave your hands around ... "differences" my aunt's fanny. SHOW ME.
And HHS is a part of the U.S. Government, but it isn't accurate for me to state that the quote is from the U.S. Government.
Listing all three is actually a courtesy.
This is beyond disingenuous.
You've posted three links because it looks better than one. You are unable to provide support for your position, so you fluff up the one link you can find.
The HHS has nothing to do with NCCAM. They're just the agency that provides oversight.
The NIH is directly responsible for NCCAM, but the NIH link you provided has absolutely nothing to do with altie woo, NCCAM, or anything else of relevance.
Your problem is that you can't turn to the AANP, ANMA, or the HANP for help because they don't define naturopathy the way you want.
To wit:
Biological homeostasis is what I understand my ND to mean by balance.
You can't turn to any of the 4 (four!) "schools" (National College of Naturopathic Medicine, Bastyr University, The Southwest College of Naturopathic Medicine and Health Sciences or The University of Bridgeport College of Natural Medicine) because they don't define naturopathy the way you want.
You can't turn to the 7 diploma mills online that sell NDs for as little as $250 because they don't define naturopathy they way you want.
You can't turn to the Textbook of Natural Medicine because it doesn't define naturopathy the way you want.
And let's have a look at that pamphlet, shall we?
The primary goal of Naturopathic treatment is to address the cause of illness, and not merely the symptoms. The patient is seen as a whole person and individualized treatment plans are based on the physical, mental and emotional needs of each patient. Naturopathy is based on the belief that the body is self-healing and will repair itself to recover from illness if given a healthy environment. A major focus is placed on wellness and disease prevention.
Naturopathic doctors emphasize food and nutrition, vitamins and minerals, herbs and similar substances and some forms of physical medicine in their clinical approach. Naturopathic doctors strive to create an environment where balance can be restored. They focus on providing each individual with the tools they need to take an active role in their own health care and wellness. Treatment plans are individualized and safe and should not interfere with any current conventional care you may be receiving.
Through individualized patient care and public education, the Naturopathic Doctor's primary purpose is: to prevent disease, support and encourage the body's natural healing process, promote health, optimize wellbeing.
Line 1: The primary goal of Naturopathic treatment is to address the cause of illness, and not merely the symptoms.
As does proper medical treatment.
Line 3: Naturopathy is based on the belief that the body is self-healing and will repair itself to recover from illness if given a healthy environment.
Besides the painfully obvious (diseases that are either genetic or genetically-linked) there is the teensy tinsy little problem of something like AIDS. Or Alzheimer's. Or arthritis. Or cancer.
Line 5: ...some forms of physical medicine...
One can only imagine. Applied kinesiology? Craniosacral manipulation? Crystals?
Line 6: Naturopathic doctors strive to create an environment where balance can be restored.
Given your insistence on homeostasis, let's take a look at the very first link on the page when I googled "homeostasis" and "naturopathy":
betterhealth.vic.gov.au writes:
The importance of homeostasis
In order to maintain its health, the body regulates itself to stay within certain physiological limits no matter what the outside environment might be. For instance, body temperature needs to be kept constant. On a cold day, the body will conserve heat by constricting the blood vessels close to the skin and directing blood flow to favour internal organs. On a hot day, the body will dilate blood vessels close to the skin and evaporate body heat with perspiration. Many other elements - such as blood gases, hormones and water - also need to be maintained within strict limits.
The process of maintaining this healthy internal balance is called homeostasis. Naturopathy believes that illness is more likely to occur if the body is ”knocked out’ of homeostasis by lifestyle or environmental factors. The central idea is that the human body is capable of maintaining a healthy state if barriers such as excessive stress and poor nutrition are eliminated. This power to self-heal is called ”the vital force’.
Why there's that pesky "vital force" again.
Line 8: Treatment plans are individualized and safe and should not interfere with any current conventional care you may be receiving.
Should not interfere, eh? Well. Who's going to see to that?
Certainly not the ND who hasn't any training in proper pharmacology.
And finally ...
But the examples you're giving are outside their professional training. A medical doctor dealing with disease is not outside his professional training.
Belief in prana/qi/"vital force"/"energies"/"vibrations" is delusional.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 201 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 1:42 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-30-2007 3:35 PM molbiogirl has replied
 Message 205 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 5:24 PM molbiogirl has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 204 of 304 (418841)
08-30-2007 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by molbiogirl
08-30-2007 3:16 PM


Don't just wave your hands around ... "differences" my aunt's fanny. SHOW ME.
You ARE from Missouri

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 3:16 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 6:05 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 205 of 304 (418843)
08-30-2007 5:24 PM
Reply to: Message 203 by molbiogirl
08-30-2007 3:16 PM


What is My Position?
quote:
You've posted three links because it looks better than one. You are unable to provide support for your position, so you fluff up the one link you can find.
No, I posted three links so readers didn't have to go look for them.
What do you think my position is?
quote:
Bloodletting for fever has been used on humans. Therefore bloodletting for fever has been tested. Therefore bloodletting for fever has its place alongside proper medical treatment.
Using your example any treatment that has gone through rigorous scientific testing has its place along side proper medical treatment. Unfortunately your statement doesn't take into account the outcome of the test.
I've already made it known that I don't intend to lump everything in one bucket.
quote:
The intent of my question (efficacy v. whole herb) is to get at just that: What on god's green earth do you mean by "different"?
Show me quantitative data. Provide a link. Point to an authoritative text. Don't just wave your hands around ... "differences" my aunt's fanny. SHOW ME.
Different means not the same as. Read the clip from the article!
Many herbalists agree that the intact ma huang stem is much safer to use for medicinal purposes than its alkaloid extracts. As an example, pure ephedrine raises blood pressure, whereas ephedra stems reduces it. Comparing the alkaloid pseudoephedrine with the entire plant, the entire plant causes fewer heart symptoms. When comparing alkaloid to alkaloid for commercial cold preparations, pseudoephedrine is less risky than ephedrine.
I simply said: Sometimes extracting only the active ingredient changes the results. It's an observation from the article. I'm not claiming anything. If you want data, you'll have to do your own research.
Better Health Channel - Naturopathy believes that illness is more likely to occur if the body is ”knocked out’ of homeostasis by lifestyle or environmental factors.
Thanks, so I was right that they equate balance with biological homeostasis.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 203 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 3:16 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 206 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 6:03 PM purpledawn has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 206 of 304 (418847)
08-30-2007 6:03 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by purpledawn
08-30-2007 5:24 PM


Purple quote mines
Thanks, so I was right that they equate balance with biological homeostasis.
You've resorted to quote mining?
Here is the whole quote:
The process of maintaining this healthy internal balance is called homeostasis. Naturopathy believes that illness is more likely to occur if the body is ”knocked out’ of homeostasis by lifestyle or environmental factors. The central idea is that the human body is capable of maintaining a healthy state if barriers such as excessive stress and poor nutrition are eliminated. This power to self-heal is called ”the vital force’.
This site does not use the definition you provided.
This site, like every other naturopathic site, defines homeostasis as balance of a non existent "life force".
I simply said: Sometimes extracting only the active ingredient changes the results. It's an observation from the article. I'm not claiming anything. If you want data, you'll have to do your own research.
Way to dance a jig.
Edited by molbiogirl, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 5:24 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 8:01 PM molbiogirl has not replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 207 of 304 (418848)
08-30-2007 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 204 by New Cat's Eye
08-30-2007 3:35 PM


Stubborn as a gd mule too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 204 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-30-2007 3:35 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 208 of 304 (418862)
08-30-2007 8:01 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by molbiogirl
08-30-2007 6:03 PM


Re: Purple quote mines
Per your quote the power to self-heal is called the vital force. The process of maintaining a healthy internal balance is called homeostasis.
Homeostasis is not the vital force per your quote. Read your own paragraph please.
As for dancing, it's difficult to dance when there isn't any music.
I'd appreciate it if you would stick to discussing my actual position, if you even know what it is, and not create your own for me.
I have asked twice (Message 201 and Message 205), what do you think my position is?

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 6:03 PM molbiogirl has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2199 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 209 of 304 (418871)
08-30-2007 9:44 PM
Reply to: Message 196 by purpledawn
08-30-2007 10:06 AM


Re: Testing Testing
quote:
If every single treatment or concept that hasn't gone through rigorous scientific testing, is banned; where is the incentive to get it tested.
Er, the incentive is to prove that it is safe and effective, so that one can sell it.
It shouldn't be legal to make money from practicing medicine that has not been tested for safety and efficacy.
For example, it shouldn't be legal for your ND to prescribe castor oil packs for an internal condition when there is no evidence whatsoever to suggest that they work.
quote:
As you said:...you do as much research as you can on your particular problem(s), and you see how they are to work with, and if what they do and advise you to do works.
How are those castor oil packs working for you? Do you even have any idea if they work at all for what your ND prescribes them for?
Naturopathic doctors emphasize food and nutrition, vitamins and minerals, herbs and similar substances and some forms of physical medicine in their clinical approach. Naturopathic doctors strive to create an environment where balance can be restored.
quote:
You wanted to know what is meant by balance. Biological homeostasis is what I understand my ND to mean by balance. Again, I can't account for every ND.
Have you asked your ND, "What does it mean when a body is 'in balance'", and did they reply, "A body is in balance when it exhibits biological homeostasis."?
I really, really, really doubt it.
And have you no comment upon all of those examples of the prevalent references to vitalism in the Naturopathic websites I listed?
Do you understand that scientific, controlled tests are the only way to know if a treatment is safe and effective?
Do you still think that untested treatments "have their place" right alongside tested treatments in healthcare?
Edited by nator, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by purpledawn, posted 08-30-2007 10:06 AM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by molbiogirl, posted 08-30-2007 9:58 PM nator has not replied
 Message 214 by purpledawn, posted 08-31-2007 12:01 PM nator has replied

molbiogirl
Member (Idle past 2671 days)
Posts: 1909
From: MO
Joined: 06-06-2007


Message 210 of 304 (418874)
08-30-2007 9:58 PM
Reply to: Message 209 by nator
08-30-2007 9:44 PM


Re: Testing Testing
And have you no comment upon all of those examples of the prevalent references to vitalism in the Naturopathic websites I listed?
I'm afraid purple is in denial, nator.
I googled "homeostasis" and "naturopathy" (Message 206) and the very first link on the very first page defined homeostasis in terms of a "vital force" and yet ...
purple writes:
Homeostasis is not the vital force per your quote.
Here's the quote:
The process of maintaining this healthy internal balance is called homeostasis. Naturopathy believes that illness is more likely to occur if the body is ”knocked out’ of homeostasis by lifestyle or environmental factors. The central idea (of homeostasis) is that the human body is capable of maintaining a healthy state if barriers such as excessive stress and poor nutrition are eliminated. This power (i.e. homeostasis) to self-heal is called ”the vital force’.
Yellow edits mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 209 by nator, posted 08-30-2007 9:44 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 213 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-31-2007 10:32 AM molbiogirl has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024