In the past, I have presented some research that "cured" homosexual animal of their homosexuality, particularly in goats and sheeps. The researchers used some kind of hormonal treatments to achieve this goal. I'm too lazy to dig up the articles now, but at the time this group of researchers got blasted by gay rights crowd and lost a lot of their fundings because of the implication they found.
You should talk to nem_jug about this, since he has said several times now that if we could show him homosexuality is in fact in nature and not simply by human choice then he will accept it.
Personally, I don't really care if homosexuality is a choice or not. The question of whether this is a choice or not should have absolutely no bearing on gay right issues. I just want to point that out before we lose track.
Although Hoot Mon did say that once we can "cure" people of homosexuality then homosexuality will indeed be a matter of choice. This is the reason why I think Hoot Mon is an in-the-closet homophobe. He said this without even considering the fact that if that is the case then heterosexuality would also be a choice.
Edited by Taz, : No reason given.
Owing to the deficiency of the English language, I have occasionally used the academic jargon generator to produce phrases that even I don't fully understand. The jargons are not meant to offend anyone or to insult anyone's intelligence!