Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Were Psychoactive Plants Designed for a Purpose or Just random evolution at work?
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 19 (451222)
01-26-2008 8:04 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Kod
01-24-2008 1:41 AM


Intent versus happenstance
There are 1000's of known plants that have a psychoactive effect)
Why would these be designed with these psychoactive compounds within them?
Well, the fact that it acts psychotropic to humans, as in having a mind-altering good time, was not the effect, whether by design or by happenstance.
Nicotene to the tobacco plant, coca to the cocaine plant, cannabis saptiva to the marijuana plant, opium to the poppy plant, etc, are all poisons to keep slugs, snails, locusts, beetles, etc, from devouring the plant.
Its the same thing with certain brightly colored frogs, much like those Quetzal may seen during his treks deep in to the Ecuadorian rain forest. Some Native American tribes have discovered that upon licking the frog, which secretes its neurotoxins, that it will induce in shamans a psychodelic response neurologically.
Human beings are much larger and can process these poisons better than smaller creatures, which for them, will kill them quickly. Instead of killing humans, it produces in them feelings associated with drugs.
When people say, "Drugs are poison," that's quite literally what they are!
The Biblical reference to such drugs is "pharmakia" in the Greek, which is where we derive the English word, Pharmacy. Regardless, it is spoken about scripturally as something to avoid, not to embrace.
One of the easiest to question is Cacti that uses Mescaline as a way of fending off insects. Yet many other plants use other compounds to do the exact same thing yet without the psychoactive effect! The simple practicality is also questionable, because mescaline isn't the most effective, wouldn't a god/designer use a more effective non psychoactive compound?
I have a better question. Why would natural selection produce this symbiotic relationship between plants and humans, since you seem to speak of it in terms of it being purposeful? What are the forces driving it that it would actually be necessary from an adaptational point of reference?
I'm sure many chronic pain sufferers that use morphine or codeine on a daily basis would happily argue that Poppie plants which produce those two compounds have a purpose. To help them live a more functional life and enjoy the life God has given them.
I have no idea how much God would be involved in nature and how much he left to happenstance. But I suppose there is that possibility. But answering one question about God often simply leads in to the next. For instance, did God create mescaline with the deliberate intent of having us use it for legitimate, medicinal uses? The next question could very well be, why does disease exist at all? The next question following that could be, well why do we live in the material universe?
It could just go on and on.
Or is it all just a fluke? A lucky roll of the dice. Which is something the advocates of Evolution would argue, that it's mere coincidence.
Overall I see so many lucky rolls so as to rule out the total possibility of random chance X natural selection. In the final analysis, all we can do is do the best we can to uncover these eternally difficult questions, and to have spirited debates about it.
Because at the end of the day, "I don't know for certain" just might be my answer.
Edited by Nemesis Juggernaut, : typos
Edited by Nemesis Juggernaut, : typo

“There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to objective reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious" -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Kod, posted 01-24-2008 1:41 AM Kod has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Quetzal, posted 01-27-2008 8:09 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 19 (451336)
01-27-2008 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Quetzal
01-27-2008 8:09 AM


Re: Intent versus happenstance
If, as the OP suggests, these few organisms really WERE designed for human use, what is the explanation for all the OTHER defenses plants have developed? Isn't more logical, as you state, that the few species humans find useful were merely serendipitous?
I got the impression that the symbiotic relationship he was alluding to between humans and plants that produce toxins, were of the same order as bees and pollinating flowers.
I just don't see the evidence to make a legitimate comparison.

“There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to objective reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious" -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Quetzal, posted 01-27-2008 8:09 AM Quetzal has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 19 (451369)
01-27-2008 1:40 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Taz
01-27-2008 11:54 AM


Re: Intent versus happenstance
In only a few thousand years, the Japanese fishermen unknowingly created this crab with a samurai face.
How did they "create" a samurai face, as opposed to it simply being an anomaly?
Or were you being jocular?

“There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to objective reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious" -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Taz, posted 01-27-2008 11:54 AM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by molbiogirl, posted 01-27-2008 1:57 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 11 of 19 (451378)
01-27-2008 2:20 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by molbiogirl
01-27-2008 1:57 PM


Re: Intent versus happenstance
By choosing to throw back those that looked like samurai.
Oh, so he means that by allowing those with anomaly to live, it increases their population because they haven't been killed, and now it becomes fixed in the population?
I get it now. Yes, I suppose that would qualify as artificial selection.
I should point out that in the case of psychoactive plants used by humans, artificial selection played a role, too. A big one.
How so? If they are killing the plants to extract the toxins from them, that would actually be hindering the plants survival. Unless of course you mean that since humans found a way to co-opt the plant, like cannabis saptiva, that humans now grow it as a form of artificial selection.
quote:
Human beings are much larger and can process these poisons better than smaller creatures, which for them, will kill them quickly.
Very small quantities of poison can kill us too. Black widow, Brazilian wandering spider, death cap mushroom, stone fish, golden poison frog, death lily, Japanese pieris shrub ... the list goes on and on.
I was speaking mostly about plants. Sure, there are various snakes deadly to us, jellyfish too, etc. But others, like certain kinds of scorpions, do not have enough toxins to kill an average-sized human where it would kill a field mouse.
Belladonnas, though, have been known to kill humans. Though in high school, I remember some students who actually planted some on school grounds and would get high off of them too.

“There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to objective reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious" -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by molbiogirl, posted 01-27-2008 1:57 PM molbiogirl has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by molbiogirl, posted 01-27-2008 5:55 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 19 (451513)
01-27-2008 10:08 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by molbiogirl
01-27-2008 5:55 PM


Re: Intent versus happenstance
Castor bean
Castor bean extract (ricin) is nasty stuff.
An ingenious, if not insidious, ploy was hatched by the KGB when they hollowed out the tip of an umbrella. Inside the umbrella was a tiny ball bearing which had perforations in it to inject ricin in to. This was used to quietly assassinate dissidents once loyal to Moscow.
Once the agent had his mark , he would walk behind him and act as if he casually bumped the umbrella against the target's leg. In reality, he fired his ricin dart directly in to the mark's leg.
Anyway, I realize that was a tangent but the point was mostly about how nasty ricin is.

“There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the 'wisdom' of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to objective reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impious" -C.S. Lewis

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by molbiogirl, posted 01-27-2008 5:55 PM molbiogirl has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024