Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,906 Year: 4,163/9,624 Month: 1,034/974 Week: 361/286 Day: 4/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   What constitutes Intelligent design?
ramoss
Member (Idle past 642 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 39 of 61 (451640)
01-28-2008 10:16 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by ICANT
01-16-2008 2:57 PM


Re: No Merit !
I see when you are talking 'theory' you are using the logical fallacy of equivocation. There is a big difference between the layman use of the term 'theory' and a scientific theory. The difference is in falsifiability, evidence, and testability. Theory in the layman term ins
speculative, and that might be called 'hypothesis' in the scientific circles. ID doesn't even make it that far, since it has no evidence for it, nor does it have any explanatory powers

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by ICANT, posted 01-16-2008 2:57 PM ICANT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024