Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should wikipedia remove pictures of Muhammad
PurpleYouko
Member
Posts: 714
From: Columbia Missouri
Joined: 11-11-2004


Message 10 of 38 (454114)
02-05-2008 4:19 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by CK
02-05-2008 3:29 PM


Re: Absolutely...
The main argument is that it upsets Muslims and causes offense - do you consider that a "good argument?
Not at all.
I deeply offends me that they give bandwidth to the Invisible pink Unicorn.
I seriously dislike that nasty equine miscreant.
She had the temerity to disrespect the color purple.
Chapter 4, verse 5 of her (not so) holy book states
that two faced IPU writes:
5. Thus came to be such minions of malaise as the Visible Brown Unicorn, and the Purple Oyster of Doom; for it is Her decision that purple is usually a color for shitheads, and yea verily so is brown.
The entry on the IPU is a complete affront to those of us of a purple pursuasion and as such it should be removed from Wikipedia. (Just ask PurpleDawn. She agrees with me.)
I don't see why the Muslims should get upset at a mre picture. The IPU called me a SHITHEAD.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by CK, posted 02-05-2008 3:29 PM CK has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024