|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: 10 Books To Save Humanity!! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jumped Up Chimpanzee Member (Idle past 4971 days) Posts: 572 From: UK Joined:
|
Straggler, sorry to be facetious, but I don't think Will Shakespeare wrote or even endorsed The complete works of Shakespeare.
And if you're allowed to count The complete works of Shakespeare as 1 of your choices, Coyote should be allowed his Encyclopedia Britannica. I'd seriously recommend a 10-pack of thrillers. It's a long journey and they don't sound like the sort of crew that would be interested in serious literature. Also, best not to fill their heads with the same ideas that screwed up this planet.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
I have a single volume book called "The Complete Works of Shakespeare" on my bookshelf. That counts as one book.
Also, best not to fill their heads with the same ideas that screwed up this planet. Oh no - Another one who thinks that we would be better off without any of the accumulated creative output of the entire human species. It makes me wonder why we bother to create anything......(**sniff**sob**sniff**)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2324 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Straggler writes:
And Coyote has 10 volumes that comprise the complete Enciclopedia Brittanica. Yet his doesn't count?
I have a single volume book called "The Complete Works of Shakespeare" on my bookshelf. That counts as one book.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jumped Up Chimpanzee Member (Idle past 4971 days) Posts: 572 From: UK Joined: |
Oh no - Another one who thinks that we would be better off without any of the accumulated creative output of the entire human species. It makes me wonder why we bother to create anything......(**sniff**sob**sniff**) Don't forget that you painted the doomsday Earth scenario that they need to get away from. But I do seriously think that apart from dry factual books and manuals, that might save them time and effort on practicalities, let them come up with their own philosophical and cultural ideas. Sure, Shakespeare wrote some good stuff that could be enjoyed and appreciated by anyone at any time. But his work is not definitive. I think it would be a good experiment to see what original ideas a new civilisation might come up with.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
The Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Edition is a 29 volume set!!!
That is stretching the 10 book limitation too far. And seriously - Is that what we would take to reflect humanities creative achievements and grand accumulation of innovation and insight? A friggin glorified dictionary!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huntard Member (Idle past 2324 days) Posts: 2870 From: Limburg, The Netherlands Joined: |
Straggler writes:
I was just making a point. If a compilation of works counts as one book, then how are we to determine when 1 volume is or is not allowed? What if we do something insane and compile the entire EB into one volume? Would it count then?
The Encyclopedia Britannica 11th Edition is a 29 volume set!!! And seriously - Is that what we would take to reflect humanities creative achievements and grand accumulation of innovation and insight? A friggin glorified dictionary!
That's not what I said, I don't think we should take the EB, encyclopedia's are far too brief on all their subjects. I'll see if I can compile a list of books this evening, but 10 is a bit less I think.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Well you can tell that we are a bunch of science geeks here can't you!! I am dismayed at the cultural desert in which I find myself. I thought better of EvC members. At worst I thought no reaction at all. But instead I get "What do we need any of the artsy fartsy crap for?"
Apparently we would be better off with nothing at all. Or maybe a science text book or two to remind us to wash our hands after taking a dump, a trashy novel for the long trip and a glorified dictionary so that will forever have at our fingertips the population of Norway in 2009. I despair.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Would it count then? If you can find it in one volume on Amazon it counts. How bout that as a criteria?
That's not what I said, I don't think we should take the EB, encyclopedia's are far too brief on all their subjects Phew!! Sanity/(Creativity) prevails!!
I'll see if I can compile a list of books this evening, but 10 is a bit less I think. The limit is imposed to make us be very selective and make us think about what is really worth saving at the expense of all else.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blue Jay Member (Idle past 2726 days) Posts: 2843 From: You couldn't pronounce it with your mouthparts Joined: |
Hi, Straggler.
Straggler writes: Have we achieved nothing as a species? Nothing worth saving and passing on to future generations? I'm only 27: I still haven't matured enough to learn when to take things seriously. That, and I have ADD, so reading long books is too hard for me. -----
Straggler writes: I would have thought the problem would be the tiny limit of 10 books. Instead it appears that those who have replied consider even that too much to bother with. I basically agree with what Dr Adequate said: there would be sentimental and cultural value in saving certain pieces of cultural literature (novels, plays, etc.), but this surely has to take a back seat to scientific and academic literature, because someone from the colony can write new works of cultural literature that the colonists can become sentimental about. So, whatever cultural contributions a work of fiction might offer can be completely compensated for by somebody else writing another work of fiction. This can feasibly happen within months of the colony’s foundation. Not so for science: if our society was without knowledge of evolution, physics, mathematics, etc., it would take multiple generations, and millions of publications, to bring us back to our current state of knowledge and applicability of that knowledge. Even having well-trained professionals in these fields won’t be good enough, because without, e.g., documented evidence and data about the various scientific theories and fields of study, you would be requiring the colony to accept these theories, not because of the evidence for them, but solely on the authority of those few professionals. Like Dr Adequate, I say that all 10 books must be of a scientific, technological or academic nature, rather than of a cultural or sentimental nature, because science is less easily replaced than culture. -Bluejay (a.k.a. Mantis, Thylacosmilus) Darwin loves you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jumped Up Chimpanzee Member (Idle past 4971 days) Posts: 572 From: UK Joined: |
Apparently we would be better off with nothing at all. Or maybe a science text book or two to remind us to wash our hands after taking a dump, a trashy novel for the long trip and a glorified dictionary so that will forever have at our fingertips the population of Norway in 2009. A more pefect summary of humanity I could not conceive. We're not perfect, but you can't help but love us.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
I basically agree with what Dr Adequate said: DA said that we should not bother with Einstein, Newton or Darwin. That doesn't seem consistent with what you are saying here.
Like Dr Adequate, I say that all 10 books must be of a scientific, technological or academic nature, rather than of a cultural or sentimental nature, because science is less easily replaced than culture. I think most who are less sciencely geeky than the average EvC participant would say the exact oposite. All the science stuff can be rediscovered but nobody will ever write Shakespeare's plays again. They will be lost forever.
Even having well-trained professionals in these fields won’t be good enough, because without, e.g., documented evidence and data about the various scientific theories and fields of study, you would be requiring the colony to accept these theories, not because of the evidence for them, but solely on the authority of those few professionals. They are not well trained in the sense of pure science. They are well trained in terms of having the practical skills required to colonize wherever. But that is a fair point (speaking as a fellow science geek ). So what ten books would you take to preserve the most important aspects of human scientific discovery? That is the question if it is the science solely route you want to take. Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coyote Member (Idle past 2135 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: |
And Coyote has 10 volumes that comprise the complete Enciclopedia Brittanica. Yet his doesn't count?
That edition is 29 large volumes. Edited by Coyote, : No reason given. Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
hotjer Member (Idle past 4573 days) Posts: 113 From: Denmark Joined: |
9*(harddisk with 5 TB of books) disguised as books
1*Laptop disguised as a book. I guess 45 TB cover the most important stuff including crazy things such as H.P. Lovecraft
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Straggler writes:
quote: Hotjer writes: 9*(harddisk with 5 TB of books) disguised as books1*Laptop disguised as a book. No cheating!!!!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Straggler writes: Apparently we would be better off with nothing at all. Or maybe a science text book or two to remind us to wash our hands after taking a dump, a trashy novel for the long trip and a glorified dictionary so that will forever have at our fingertips the population of Norway in 2009. A more pefect summary of humanity I could not conceive.
We're not perfect, but you can't help but love us. I'm not loving anyone who hasn't washed their hands after a dump.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024