Which is why I conceded this fact for the sake of discussion in order to have one, instead of remonstrating a point that will never be settled.
Ok, but
this question won't ever be settled, either. So why trade one for the other? Why skip ahead?
but you have those that believe he does exist and IMO some concessions have to be made if you want to have a discussion past that point.
Why would anyone want to have a discussion past that point?
How can you name something that doesn't exist?
With my mouth. Are the following words really meaningless to you?
"Warp drive"
"Vulcan"
"Lightsaber"
"Hobbit"
"Elf"
"Dragon"
Naming things that don't exist? Child's play. Literally, no more difficult than a child's game.
I understand and agree,but you haven't defined him,you've just told me what he wasn't.
No, not at all. If you go back and read you'll see that every portion of my definition is a positive term describing what God
is, not a negative term describing what he's not.