Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,905 Year: 4,162/9,624 Month: 1,033/974 Week: 360/286 Day: 3/13 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is it necessary to provide the Vatican's numbering system?
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 2 of 25 (607469)
03-03-2011 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel
03-02-2011 2:32 PM


CraztDiamond7 writes:
If you don't recognize the authority of the State of Vatican then don't use it since every verse division number pertains to them since 1560 when the fragments were entirelly divided into the verse numbering form.
It has nothing to do with recognizing authority. It's just common courtesy to give the references - so people know what you're refering to.

You can have brevity and clarify, or you can have accuracy and detail, but you can't easily have both. --Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-02-2011 2:32 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2011 3:28 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 5 of 25 (607472)
03-03-2011 4:00 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel
03-03-2011 3:28 PM


Re: Would you call it happiness
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
- To whom the Word belongs - If a book that contains your words is written without numbers of verse divisions,
Would you allow an unauthorized group, whose system is criminal and breaks all of the ten commandments, to divide it into the verse numbering form?
-
And whenever that verse division, that was first printed for themselves, is quoted and spoken as if it was a part of your word
Would you call it happiness?
If I was God, I wouldn't be so petty.

You can have brevity and clarify, or you can have accuracy and detail, but you can't easily have both. --Percy

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-03-2011 3:28 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-10-2011 2:32 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 14 of 25 (608503)
03-10-2011 6:39 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by goldenlightArchangel
03-10-2011 2:32 PM


Re: Let's come out of this BABY
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
If you were as I AM
you would use a verse division number created by whom is of I AM
instead of using the means that were imposed under an alleged authority of an Archbishop and corrupt Cardinals.
As I said, if I was as I AM, I wouldn't be so petty. I'd be glad of any number system that helped make My Holy Word™ easier to understand.
Any I AM WHO IS concerned about such trivialities isn't worthy of my notice.

If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-10-2011 2:32 PM goldenlightArchangel has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-11-2011 2:24 PM ringo has replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 441 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 21 of 25 (608618)
03-11-2011 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by goldenlightArchangel
03-11-2011 2:24 PM


Re: Let's come out of this BABY
CrazyDiamond7 writes:
You are really talking about a god; it's a god that would need to be believed so that it can in fact exist;
So, if it doesn't exist without us, it can't care what number system we impose on the words that we put in its mouth.
Edited by ringo, : Had an attack of arachnophilia and didn't capitalize the sentence.

If you have nothing to say, you could have done so much more concisely. -- Dr Adequate

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by goldenlightArchangel, posted 03-11-2011 2:24 PM goldenlightArchangel has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024