Do modern reactors use carbon in their control rods?
Rahvin writes:
They don't typically explain the mechanism by which so many people would be exposed to actually-dangerous levels of radiation.
I don't believe the worst case scenario involves exposures to acute doses of radiation. Relatively few people are exposed to that danger.
I always thought that the worst case scenario was the release of fission products from the fuel into the atmosphere and ground water. What that would take would be some mechanism for damaging containment coupled with a meltdown that destroyed the integrity of the fuel system so that the fission products are no longer retained in the fuel cladding.
In particular things like Strontium 90, radioactive isotopes of iodine, radon, and other short lived radionucides are life threatening hazzards in relatively small amounts and some are very difficult/impossible to remove from the body.
quote:
Even in our wildest nightmares, we are not looking at another Chernobyl. Not even close.
Probably not, but we don't know yet if the worst is over.