Japan

Hmm, 15:55-14:46 = 1h09min. Is there a typo somewhere?

While I agree with most of your argument, I think you forgot to talk about the part of energy production that comes from nuclear compared to that coming from coal. If say 5% of energy was produced by nuclear technology and 95% by coal (random example), nuclear energy would still be relatively more dangerous if there were 1000 people dying from it while 15000 died from coal mining/use. In this case, taking the real numbers into account doesn't change the conclusion though but should have been included for completeness sake. For 2005 , nuclear energy is actually producing 6% of our energy while coal is responsible for 25% of it.

Just to be clear, hydrogene cannot be a source of energy, it's just storing energy since hydrogene produced comes from water.

Yeah, I've never understood why people want to privatize energy production and distribution. The large infrastructures needed for it will always garantee a monopoly/near monopoly for the producer meaning there is no advantages(for consumers) when compared to public ownership and only disadvantages.

Small nitpick: actually Chernobyl is in Ukraine, though at the time of the accident, Ukraine was part of the USSR (I guess it's where the confusion is coming from).