Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,924 Year: 4,181/9,624 Month: 1,052/974 Week: 11/368 Day: 11/11 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Alternative Cosmology?
Alfred Maddenstein
Member (Idle past 3998 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 04-01-2011


Message 24 of 25 (613420)
04-25-2011 6:11 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by slevesque
05-11-2010 5:16 PM


slevesque writes:
I think this is a very interesting topic to look after in the up coming years. I could see a paradigm shift coming in cosmology if enough counter-evidence to the current BBT can pile up to become unavoidable.
Dark matter and energy are areas where I could see the paradigm shifting early. I'm sure cavediver remembers how I once called them fudge factors, and I still think they are.
It's like back when Newton's theory of universal gravity came to explain a lot of incredible things, but failed to explain the precession of the perihelion of the orbit of Mercury. To explain the difference, an ''unknown'' planet named Vulcan was hypothesied to exist.Some looked for that planet for over 50 years. We now know that the answer lied elsewhere, namely new physics with Einstein's relativity.
I think it is a distinct possibility that the same is happening with dark matter. We have been searching for it for what, at least 20-30 years now ? With no concensus on what it is, and only very disputed evidence of it's detection. Maybe then the answer to the discrepencies dark matter is hypothesied to explain will in fact be answered from another direction, maybe new physics once again ?
I'm sure the old-schoolers in physics such as Cavediver will disagree with me. But then again, that's why we need young and naive New-comers on the scene like me
AbE I read a quote on that phenomenon once, something along the liens of ''science progresses with the replacement of the old minds''. (It may be something worded totally differently, but this was the essence of the message)
Yes, of course, physics will get a good shave with Occam's razor and it is new blood that will be doing the job. Cavediver will stick to his old guns till the day he dies. How long will it take is hard to tell, but it is clear that BBT won't be spared by the razor. Let's face it; what exists is observable at least indirectly while all the evidence for the dark matter and energy together with inflationary expansion is the radiation those entities emit in the process of fitting the wrong initial assumptions.
None exists in any other fashion. The dropping of the assumptions may safely remove the whole bunch of the mystical singularities.
As it is, most of the alternative theories are not free from inconsistencies and contradictions, yet next to the astronomical scale of contradictions inherent in the mainstream view without anybody seeming to mind the absurdities, those inconsistencies are minor indeed.
Plasma or Standing Wave cosmology and others may seem novel or rather unusual, yet none of them at any point suggests any total break-down of the necessity itself. Nor in any of these "crank" theories the galaxies are assumed to behave like a bunch of scared birds with distances accelerating like a magic carpet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by slevesque, posted 05-11-2010 5:16 PM slevesque has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024