Now I'm not saying that we shouldn't be considering that but I believe it is the case that if we reduced our emissions by 100% global warming would still continue which I think is consistent with that CERN report.
The CERN report is not inconsistent with that conclusion, but the CERN report isn't any kind of strong support support for the conclusion either.
As I understand from reading discussions on the net, the CERN report suggests a possible mechanism by which the sun can affect galactic cosmic radiation on earth which in turn affects cloud formation.
But there is then the problem that there is no historical evidence of any relationship between galactic cosmic radiation and global climate change, while there is considerable evidence of a correlation between global temperatures and greenhouse gas concentrations.
In other words, the CERN report is way too little to get one's hopes up that man cannot have a substantial effect on reducing or delaying global warming. And it certainly is ridiculous to suggest that CERN is
the group doing climate science rather than climate politics.
Unfortunately, when it comes to global climate change, reality does seem to have a well known of liberal bias.
Edited by NoNukes, : Clarity