I don't think throwing a drowning man a straw is lying. It's just placating those who believe the man isn't really drowning.
You claimed that he knowingly wrote what he did not believe to be true. If you do not count that as "lying" then ... then that goes some way towards explaining your own behavior.
This from Motoo:
"More than a decade and a half ago, in collaboration with Ohta, I enumerated five principles that govern molecular evolution, one of which states that functionally less important molecules or parts of a molecule evolve (in terms of mutant substitutions) faster than more important ones."
Even here Kimura is throwing the neo-Darwinists a bone. He could equally have said that functionally less important parts of a molecule evolve, while important ones don't. After all, this is precisely what his research shows.
So, you once more accuse him of falsehood.
"When this principle was proposed, accompanied by its neutralist explanation, much opposition was voiced by the neo-Darwinian establishment"
You boys got your knickers in a twist.
"... but I am glad to note that it has become a part of common knowledge among molecular biologists
Yes, all evolutionists agree with Kimura. As does he with them.
I was right. Suck it up.
What do you imagine you were right about?
Hey, you can still pretend that selection somehow -magically- evolves the phenotype while leaving the genotype untouched.
I cannot "still" do that because I have never done it.
You were having a hard enough time lying about Kimura's opinions behind his back. Now you are lying to me about my own opinions to my face. How do you think that is going to work out for you?