its not just a science forum but a evolution verses creation forum.
By your line of reasoning there could be no creationist defence since your saying always creationism is not scientific.
A very strange forum it would be.
The bible is a starting presumption for creationism.
One could say the bible or creationism have the right to make hypothesis as anyone.
Then attack our methodology or conclusions.
The bible says man only began to eat meat after the flood.
Therefore its likely this meant a change in the teeth which would affect the whole head/jaw.
Today we have wisdom teeth problems and so its reasonable to conclude this is from the diet change and explains this unique problem.
The wisdom teeth were not for eating meat however the switch to eating meat crowded them out as other teeth became important.
Why not?