Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,902 Year: 4,159/9,624 Month: 1,030/974 Week: 357/286 Day: 13/65 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Austerity measures have they ever saved an economy?
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3267 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 55 of 168 (648945)
01-19-2012 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by New Cat's Eye
01-19-2012 12:53 PM


Re: No Income No Spend
I don't know how bad it is, and I doubt it really costs $600 for a hammer, but I don't think that all of the "spending" (or costs) of the government contributes to private income.
But the money has to go somewhere, right? Even if it's being paid to the clerk for requisitioning the order form to send out the RFQ on a new hammer, then paid to another clerk for receiving the quotes from multiple contractors...it's still being paid to real, live human beings, who then can spend it on TVs and fast food hamburgers.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-19-2012 12:53 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3267 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 56 of 168 (648946)
01-19-2012 1:19 PM
Reply to: Message 54 by crashfrog
01-19-2012 1:14 PM


Re: No Income No Spend
It's not really "spending" any more than it's spending when you go to an ATM and transfer $40 from your checking account to your wallet.
Well, except for the $1.25 "service fee"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 54 by crashfrog, posted 01-19-2012 1:14 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3267 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 143 of 168 (649475)
01-23-2012 4:47 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by NoNukes
01-23-2012 4:38 PM


Re: Service Jobs
I think what Jon is trying to say, though he's not articulating it very well, is that the service jobs we do in theis country that are "un-offshorable" do not produce anything that can be sold overseas.
The off-shorable jobs, like manufacturing and mining and such, produce goods that can then be sold back to America. This creates a trade deficit.
The point that Jon seems to be overlooking is that much of the jobs being sent over seas are still owned by American companies, so they don't technically contribute to a trade deficit.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by NoNukes, posted 01-23-2012 4:38 PM NoNukes has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Jon, posted 01-23-2012 8:31 PM Perdition has replied
 Message 147 by NoNukes, posted 01-24-2012 7:33 AM Perdition has replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3267 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


(1)
Message 150 of 168 (649553)
01-24-2012 10:08 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by NoNukes
01-24-2012 7:33 AM


Re: Service Jobs
The jobs that produce things that can be sold overseas are surely also exportable.
Yes, and these are the jobs we're losing overseas. Leaving us with only jobs that don't produce anything that can be sold overseas. Which creates a trade deficit.
Those jobs exists because we require them to be performed.
Yes, the jobs are required, but if everyone is a hairdresser, a burger flipper, or a yoga instructor, we're left with jobs that are only useful for those in the immediate area, and cannot produce anything to be sold overseas.
These jobs were necessary 20 years ago, too, but we also had manufacturing and other jobs that allowed us to sell things overseas rather than having to import everything we want to buy now.
So it occurs to me that the blaming anything but exportable jobs for the trade balance is without merit.
I believe that's exactly what Jon is blaming. Jobs that can be exported are the ones that allowed us to have trade goods. Now that they're exported, we no longer have trade goods, leaving us with jobs that don't produce anything to sell overseas. The very reason they can't be exported is the same reason they make nothing we can trade.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by NoNukes, posted 01-24-2012 7:33 AM NoNukes has seen this message but not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3267 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 151 of 168 (649555)
01-24-2012 10:15 AM
Reply to: Message 145 by Jon
01-23-2012 8:31 PM


Re: Service Jobs
What the hell is this, then?
I never said we didn't have a trade imbalance. I was merely pointing out that the global economy is a bit more complicated than that. For example, I drive a Honda Accord and my wife drives a Chevy Malibu. One of those is considered a domestic car, the other an import. One was built in Maryland, the other in Mexico. The strange thing is, the "domestic" car was the one built in Mexico, the "import" was created in Maryland.
The definitions are becoming blurred as companies that are nominally in one country actually do most of their work in another country or countries.
When Apple sells an iPhone, it's considered a domestic product because Apple is an American company, despite the fact that it's being built in China. The money for every one sold ultimately ends up back in the hands of the owners and shareholders, who are largely in America, and who then buy the services that are all we produce anymore.
In fact, the glass used in the iPhone screen is also produced in China, but again, the major company that produces it, Corning, is another American company.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by Jon, posted 01-23-2012 8:31 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Jon, posted 01-24-2012 10:24 AM Perdition has replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3267 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


(1)
Message 154 of 168 (649561)
01-24-2012 10:50 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by Jon
01-24-2012 10:24 AM


Re: Service Jobs
And that's something worth looking into. But I don't think we'll find that our trade deficit is just a matter of funny definitions that disappears once we go the way of Webster. There really is a deficit because we really are importing more than we're exporting.
Very true. I never intended to disagree with you. There very definitely is a trade deficit, and the exporting of our manufacturing base is a very large part of it. I was merely pointing out that it's not quite as black and white as it may have seemed you were indicating.
But plenty of it goes to the workers in India who assembled the stuff, and the workers in India who mined the metal, and the workers in India who cleared the forest where the metal was to be mined... and so on.
True, but the major reason jobs get exported in the first place si that the workers get paid relatively little compared to a similar worker in America. So the vast majority of the money you spend on goods made by "American" companies in overseas plants does end up back in America in the hands of Sam Billionaire.
Of course, having it in the hands of Sammy Bigbucks does nothing to help those laid-off employees in Oregon.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Jon, posted 01-24-2012 10:24 AM Jon has not replied

  
Perdition
Member (Idle past 3267 days)
Posts: 1593
From: Wisconsin
Joined: 05-15-2003


Message 157 of 168 (649573)
01-24-2012 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 155 by crashfrog
01-24-2012 12:26 PM


Re: Yglesias on China
Interesting stuff. To roll it into the discussion, I guess I'd ask: why do Americans think that they deserve to be the manufacturing center of the world? To get to Jon's point, why do we think that Americans deserve not to have a trade deficit? Isn't that just a natural consequence of being a rich country of only 375 million people in a world of 7 billion?
I'd say part of it is the myth of American exceptionalism. But a much larger part of it is that America always hhas been the center of manufacturing and innovation. The fact that the rest of the world, particularly China is catching up, is great from a global perspective, but from a local one, all we see is the standard of living going down.
It's like with my dog. She goes into her kennel at night, and I give her a treat. She doesn't really deserve the treat any more, I'm no longer training her, but if she doesn't get it, she feels slighted. So, as Americans, we've been trained to expect these jobs and this standard of living, that, perhaps, we don't deserve.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by crashfrog, posted 01-24-2012 12:26 PM crashfrog has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024