Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Anti-Science bill in Indiana.....
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 86 of 154 (651388)
02-07-2012 7:57 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Artemis Entreri
02-06-2012 11:00 AM


Re: LOL AWESOME
Nah, we're always cursing the weather wheel and then we have to repent. It's a vicious cycle.
God gave us good (for winter anyway) weather for the Super Bowl, but now winter is back and our gardens will probably pay dearly this summer. We are a muddy mess.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Artemis Entreri, posted 02-06-2012 11:00 AM Artemis Entreri has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Artemis Entreri, posted 02-08-2012 11:41 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 90 of 154 (651454)
02-07-2012 3:36 PM
Reply to: Message 88 by Perdition
02-07-2012 10:14 AM


Final Part
How's this look?
I ask that you carefully research the facts behind the drive to bring creationism into our children’s classrooms. It isn’t about science. It’s about belief.
We should speak where the Bible speaks and be silent where the Bible is silent. The Bible is silent on science.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by Perdition, posted 02-07-2012 10:14 AM Perdition has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Perdition, posted 02-07-2012 4:06 PM purpledawn has not replied
 Message 93 by Trixie, posted 02-07-2012 4:13 PM purpledawn has replied
 Message 94 by jar, posted 02-07-2012 5:00 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 95 of 154 (651548)
02-08-2012 7:21 AM


Letter In The Mail
Well the letter is in the mail and I sent a revised version to my Senator chastising him for voting for the bill.
I will post any responses I receive.
Thanks to all for the suggestions and nitpicking.
Hopefully it will make a difference.
My avatar will stay as is until this issue is either rejected or unfortunately signed into law.

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 136 of 154 (652626)
02-15-2012 6:09 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by Coyote
02-14-2012 11:01 PM


Re: Its dead, Jim!
This bill may be dead, but the author is still twitching.
Indianapolis
Kruse said today that he had hoped the House would revise the bill to be closer to his original proposal and was disappointed by Bosma's decision.
Kruse said he will probably introduce the proposal again next year and that lawmakers shouldn't just rely on the Supreme Court's 1987 ruling on the teaching of creationism.
"We have five pretty decent Supreme Court members who have been ruling pretty conservative on a lot of different things and they might have had a different ruling," Kruse said.
Feb 13, 2012 Opinion This person is an attorney.
Creationists should not be muzzled, instead, our ideas should be able to compete on their merits - especially at school.
I have to hear from a creationist to explain why the need for creationism to be taught in the public school system in required classes instead of as an elective or in their own religious institutions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Coyote, posted 02-14-2012 11:01 PM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 139 by Taq, posted 02-15-2012 11:23 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3487 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 141 of 154 (653033)
02-17-2012 3:19 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by Trixie
02-07-2012 4:13 PM


Response to House Ltr
Got a response today from my House Rep.
Since the Speaker of the House killed the bill, my rep didn't say much.
The bill allowing the teaching of the various theories concerning the origin of life (the legislation was amended in the Senate to require theories from multiple religions be taught) is unlikely to receive a committee hearing or vote in the House. The Speaker of the House stated to the media last week that delving into an issue that the US Supreme Court has said is not compliant with the US Constitution is an area we don’t need to get into and he also assigned the bill to the Rules and Legislative Procedures Committee which is generally where bills are assigned to ensure they don’t get committee hearings.
I highly doubt that this legislation will be passed into law or come before me for a vote. However, should it come before me I will certainly keep your concerns and opposition in mind.
Sincerely,
Rep. Tim Brown, MD
District 41

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Trixie, posted 02-07-2012 4:13 PM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by Taq, posted 02-17-2012 4:53 PM purpledawn has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024