Have you read that one person's CV?
No. But I've read the crap you post here. Has he?
I think I will stick with his opinion rather than yours.
Has he expressed an opinion on all of the crap that you've posted here? If I recall, the reason your communication with him has been through emails is that he doesn't do forums boards. If that's accurate, obviously he hasn't read all of the crap you've posted here. Therefore, he's hardly in a position to judge whether the crap you've posted here is meaningless drivel demonstrating a complete lack of understanding of science or the scientific method. That's of course assuming you've had any communication with him in the first place.
Even if you did accurately understanding something that one person wrote, that certainly doesn't show that you understand science generally. I have seen the crap you post here. You don't know the first thing about science.
{AbE}And look, after posting my reply I notice a prime example of your crap, displaying a near total ignorance of the ToE:
I do not deny evolution. I have stated many times on this board that I accept the theory of evolution. What I do not accept is the rationale that evolution has to be a natural phenomen that started out of nothing and is random w/o any purpose.
Tell you what, why don't you send that little clip to your pen pal and see what he thinks of it.
Edited by subbie, : As noted
Ridicule is the only weapon which can be used against unintelligible propositions. -- Thomas Jefferson
We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
It has always struck me as odd that fundies devote so much time and effort into trying to find a naturalistic explanation for their mythical flood, while looking for magical explanations for things that actually happened. -- Dr. Adequate
...creationists have a great way to detect fraud and it doesn't take 8 or 40 years or even a scientific degree to spot the fraud--'if it disagrees with the bible then it is wrong'.... -- archaeologist
™ Version 4.2
