What I like is the cognitive dissonance embedded in the lines
destroying evolution Message 1:
-- Because if fossils happened the way that they have devised
--- Then there would be a huge layer depth change
---- In the spot where the fossil was
----- To represent the local flood
------ But there is no depth change in the area
------- And they will just ignore this discrepancy
The evolutionary (actually geology and paleontology) explanation is incorrect ... because it ignores the evidence of the flood ... that is not there?
but it seems he was indoctrinated in one of the Christian Madrasas ...
I am reminded of the problem with computers -- gigo.
Enjoy.
Edited by RAZD, : subtitle
Edited by RAZD, : added