Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,901 Year: 4,158/9,624 Month: 1,029/974 Week: 356/286 Day: 12/65 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genesis 1:1-5 — Day One
vimesey
Member (Idle past 102 days)
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


(2)
Message 4 of 110 (661402)
05-05-2012 5:55 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jon
05-04-2012 11:44 PM


Re: The Light was Good
Hi there CreationJon,
I read your post a few times, and was just wondering - is your question similar to the old zen question about whether a tree falling in the middle of a forest makes a sound if no-one is there to hear it ?
In other words, we're comfortable that a tree falling will create pressure waves in the air molecules, radiating out from the fallen tree - the energy the falling tree produces dissipates partially in this way. That will happen every time a tree falls, regardless of whether anyone is there. However, is it correct to call that phenomenon "sound" if those pressure waves don't vibrate an eardrum ? It's a neat little semantic question, but not one which takes you anywhere.
I read your post as asking a similar question about "light". Are you saying that yes, waves of photons could well have been radiating from a source before the earth was formed, but it is only when the earth was there for those waves to hit, that we can actually call them "light" ?
Please let me know if I've misunderstood you.
Cheers
vimesey

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jon, posted 05-04-2012 11:44 PM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Jon, posted 05-05-2012 8:37 AM vimesey has not replied

  
vimesey
Member (Idle past 102 days)
Posts: 1398
From: Birmingham, England
Joined: 09-21-2011


Message 43 of 110 (661681)
05-09-2012 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by Jon
05-09-2012 7:35 AM


Re: The Light was Good
Creation Jon writes:
We know that light requires various matters and energies to exist; so it would be silly to suggest that it can exist prior to those matters and energies.
Well, I am no scientist, and it would be wrong of me to even try to drill down into the detail of precisely how light (and other wavelengths on the electromagnetic spectrum) are emitted under various circumstances. But let's take your statement at face value for a moment.
If it would be silly to suggest that light can exist before various matters and energies exist (and I'm pretty sure that no one is suggesting that (subject to my earlier point about things being much more complex)), then why is it not silly to suggest that those matters and energies can exist for a day or so before they get round to producing light ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by Jon, posted 05-09-2012 7:35 AM Jon has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by NoNukes, posted 05-09-2012 9:43 AM vimesey has not replied
 Message 46 by Jon, posted 05-10-2012 11:57 AM vimesey has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024