|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Is String Theory Supernatural? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
CS writes: I don't know because I don't know what supernatural is. Then how can you claim to believe in the supernatural?
CS writes: If you mean "above" or "outside" of nature (i.e. our universe), then I can see how it could work as a description. If there is a multiverse why is "nature" limited to our universe?
CS writes: But if you mean "magic", then no, I wouldn't say string theory is supernatural. Do you know what "magic" is? Do you believe in magic?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Dogma writes: Anything that can be known will be incorporated into the realm of the natural. See Studying the supernatural
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dogmafood Member (Idle past 377 days) Posts: 1815 From: Ontario Canada Joined: |
See Studying the supernatural I wonder if you could narrow down your response a little? If not then I would refer you to the Encyclopaedia Britannica. You said in the other thread,
Ultimately "supernatural" means those things which are defined as being inherently immune from physical explanation. Is the existence of the universe an example of something like that? History tells us that the explanation is coming. Is string theory really equivalent to the by gosh and by golly ideas of ghosts and gods?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined:
|
Straggler writes: Ultimately "supernatural" means those things which are defined as being inherently immune from physical explanation. Pro writes: Is the existence of the universe an example of something like that? It depends doesn't it? If the universe was migically poofed into existence by an omniscient, omnipotent creator of all that is seen and unseen - Then yes the creation and existence of the universe would be an example of something like that.
Pro writes: History tells us that the explanation is coming. Sure. And the present state of theoretical physics suggests that the answers may well involve expanding our conceptual horizons to something even greater than the notion of our own single universe.
Pro writes: Is string theory really equivalent to the by gosh and by golly ideas of ghosts and gods? No. Because ghosts and gods are supernatural concepts whilst the notion of the multiverse isn't. It was only because I was so taken aback by the assertion that anything involving natural laws that were not those of our own universe qualifies as "supernatural" that I wrote the OP to this thread. Personally I think classifying string theory as a theory of the supernatural because it suggests universes other than our own to be a rather silly approach.........
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2979 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
It has been suggested over in the topic Can science say anything about a Creator God? that anything which exists outside the physical laws of our universe is supernatural. This is a terrible argument. Our universe is a representative of the physical laws NOT the actual physical laws. The laws of physics aren't limited to what is found in this universe. As is always said, a tweek here or there and the universe would be different, and a multi-verse system would be how the many variations are represented. I don't think it makes sense to say that something can "exist" outside of any physical laws, be it the ones our universe is bound by, or another variation of them. To "exist" is to be bound by some kind of physical laws. Something that isn't bound by some kind of physical law/s simply doesn't exist. Anyone claiming they've experienced something like that is delusional. - Oni Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
Straggler writes: So if we are the science project of an alien in another universe that alien is God..... Why not if you want to look at it that way?
Straggler writes: There are all sorts of things we cannot directly perceive but instead logically infer based on physical evidence. E.g. dark matter. I fail to see why the multi-verse is any different in terms of qualifying as 'natural'. Here is the first definition from Webster's:quote: A multi-verse is certainly outside the visible observable universe as is dark matter for that matter. The line gets pretty blurred.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1.61803 Member (Idle past 1532 days) Posts: 2928 From: Lone Star State USA Joined: |
hi Straggler
Straggler writes: It's the difference between magic and the physical laws in another universe. Have you ever watched a show called 'Fringe' I enjoyed watching it and am in the process of watching the series from the beginning. The show is basically about a small group of people who work for a faction of the Homeland Defense Dept. They investigate the wierd, unexplained, supernatural stuff that happens.The show always begins with some inexplicable horrific experience like a body solidifying and exploding, or a large parasitic worm crawling out of a group of human Chinese incubators or people popping back and forth between alternate universes..... anyway the Fringe team usually solves the mystery by the end of the hour. It always involves some naturalist scientific explanation. Is string theory/M-theory supernatural?String theory is a theory that makes some untestable assumptions that only work if there are 11 dimentions. The theory can never be tested/observed, since the strings are Plankes length and unobservable. But that does not mean it is un provable. Are these theories supernatural? imo No. There is one theory that the reason gravity is such a weak force is because it is leaking into our universe from another universe. So we possibly are already influenced by a extra dimentional phenomenon. Is it supernatural. I do not think so.Some theist believe that God (if he exist) is the one responsible for the super intelligent extradimentional beings that possibly created our universe/our existance. Now that would be supernatural."You were not there for the beginning. You will not be there for the end. Your knowledge of what is going on can only be superficial and relative" William S. Burroughs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
GDR writes: Why not if you want to look at it that way? I don't. I think classifying anything outside of our physical universe as "supernatural" is a very silly way of looking at ideas in modern physics.
GDR writes: Here is the first definition from Webster's: Somneone should inform Websters that they have classified Dark Matter as supernatural. I think they might dispute that.
GDR writes: A multi-verse is certainly outside the visible observable universe as is dark matter for that matter. As was the Higgs Boson prior to the LHC being built. Do things flip from being supernatural to natural depending on our technological ability to detect them as far as you are concerned?
GDR writes: The line gets pretty blurred. The fact it is being blurred doesn't mean it needs to be blurred or that any blurring is justified...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Numbers writes: It always involves some naturalist scientific explanation. Sounds like the X Files in reverse. There Scully relentlessly proclaimed "there must be a rational explanation here" but there rarely was....
Numbers writes: The theory can never be tested/observed, since the strings are Plankes length and unobservable. Nor can quarks be directly observed. So what? Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Straggler Member (Idle past 94 days) Posts: 10333 From: London England Joined: |
Oni writes: This is a terrible argument. I agree. But there are people here who are actually proposing this
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
onifre Member (Idle past 2979 days) Posts: 4854 From: Dark Side of the Moon Joined: |
The line gets pretty blurred. Manipulating the line makes it blurry.
quote: This is a messy definition for two reasons. First, beyond the obsevable universe is still more universe - it is only beyond observation from our place in the universe. As we understand the expansion of the universe, eventually everything will expand beyond an ability to observe it from Earth. Second, none of that above information is "of or relating to God or a god, demigod, spirit, or devil" since those things are the subject of fictional books, stories and mythology. A better definition of the supernatural would be, "something that isn't bound by any physical laws." - Oni Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taq Member Posts: 10084 Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
A multi-verse is certainly outside the visible observable universe as is dark matter for that matter. The line gets pretty blurred. The question is why should we limit the "natural" to the observable universe? That is like limiting the natural to our planet which would make the Sun a supernatural object. Also, if string theory is true then there is no deity involved. That would seem to remove a very important leg from the definition of supernatural. I really doubt that people will want to include machine like and mindless processes in the definition of supernatural. Just look at how upset people become when we want to replace direct special creation with a mechanistic process like evolution. Edited by Taq, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 440 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Straggler writes:
If the multiverse laws were distinct from our laws, I think it would be permissible to label them as "supernatural". I might prefer "extranatural".
Even if that ability were the result of technology based on utilising the natural laws under which the multiverse itself operates.......?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
Straggler writes: As was the Higgs Boson prior to the LHC being built. Do things flip from being supernatural to natural depending on our technological ability to detect them as far as you are concerned? I think we might have different assumptions about the subject. Frankly I was just questioning the definition of the word supernatural without the definition necessarily involving god(s). I answered your first question about an alien creator being a god but after that I was just looking for a definition so that it could be applied to string theory. It seems to me that if you decide that string theory is supernatural it doesn't make any assumptions about whether there is god or not. So you tell me. "Do things flip from being supernatural to natural depending on our technological ability to detect them as far as you are concerned?" From the dictionary definitions the line seems to be blurred and this has nothing to do with my theistic beliefs.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GDR Member Posts: 6202 From: Sidney, BC, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 2.1 |
onifre writes: A better definition of the supernatural would be, "something that isn't bound by any physical laws." That sounds good to me, as does what Ringo suggested.He has told you, O man, what is good ; And what does the LORD require of you But to do justice, to love kindness, And to walk humbly with your God. Micah 6:8
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024