Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,912 Year: 4,169/9,624 Month: 1,040/974 Week: 367/286 Day: 10/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   My Beliefs- GDR
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 3 of 1324 (698267)
05-05-2013 1:53 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by GDR
05-04-2013 7:13 PM


Synopsis I
GDR writes:
I decided that I would attempt to lay out my beliefs and the rationale for them in a separate thread. I know that the idea of having a thread on my personal beliefs sounds just a tad egotistical so I’m hoping that it will be accepted in the light in which it is intended.
I for one am delighted to hear your beliefs. I will be asking you lots of questions...please bear with me.
First off let me be clear that my Christian beliefs are a faith. They are not based on science but I do believe that my rationale for holding them is reasonable.
First off, let me ask: In your opinion, are beliefs that people hold a product of their culture? In other words, if you or I were born in India, would our chances of being Christians diminish significantly? I believe that Jesus Christ is Gods character and transcends cultures. Comment?
GDR writes:
Firstly I believe in an intelligent first cause.
I agree. I believe that God exists and would exist even if no human on the planet believed in Him. I believe that the premise of Jesus Christ being Gods character in human form sent to humanity is also plausible.
Secondly I am a theist. Once I accept the position that we are the result of an intelligent first cause I then have to ask myself, so what. Does it really matter whether we are or aren’t the result of an intelligent first cause? My first thought is that it would seem unlikely to me that this intelligence would create us without maintaining an ongoing interest in the project.
I agree. Without trying to sound too religious, scripture speaks for itself on this: John 3:16-21(NIV)--
16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."
Also we are able to distinguish right from wrong. We have a sense of morality that IMHO goes beyond personal survival which indicates to me an on-going interest. As someone who believes in an intelligent first cause I have to believe that there was what would be called a miracle that got everything off and running. As it required involvement at that point I see no reason to think that in one way or another that this intelligence would not still be involved in what had been created.
Seems logical and reasonable to me.
Thirdly, I am a Christian. My Christianity essentially has one absolute, and without that one absolute I would not be a Christian. The Christian faith grew from the belief in the bodily resurrection of Jesus. Paul tells us that if that isn’t true then our faith is in vain and we are, in his words, to be pitied. I think that he is correct. By resurrection I mean that Jesus died on the cross and was later resurrected into a new bodily form that was like, but at the same time different, than his pre-crucifixion body. It is my belief that God will at the end of time as we know it, resurrect all of creation in the renewal of all things, and (for lack of a better term), the resurrected Jesus was/is the prototype for our own resurrection.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
GDR writes:
I have read a number of books and listened to debates by Biblical scholars and others arguing both sides of the question of the truth of the resurrection. There are a lot of very bright and knowledgeable people on both sides of the issue but I find the argument for the resurrection far more compelling than the argument against.
This series is very well done. Atheists have their own videos, but to me they are no more compelling than this series. Part 1 is above.
The Bible is a series of books written by a series of authors. I believe that the authors were inspired to write down their histories, their beliefs about God, what they believed God wanted them to know and so on.
I agree, and add that these authors were quite spiritual men and had no selfish agenda...apart from educating the Jews on what it was they had missed.
To understand the Bible as inerrant, or as dictated by God, not only makes God very inconsistent and contradictory, but also a God capable of cruelty and injustice.
I agree, and believe that the Bible is in summation a story of the character of Jesus Christ..introduced to History as He stepped out of eternity into time and dwelt among us.
I do believe that God has always spoken to us through our hearts minds and imaginations and so we should take seriously the words of the Bible to sort out just what God does have to say to us.... Paul also had considerable contact with the original followers of Jesus and was convinced to make a complete turnaround in his beliefs about Jesus so I contend that what he has to say should be taken very seriously as well.
I agree, and believe that Paul had the indwelling Holy Spirit...something that not every human automatically has...and that even though every character in the Bible was human, only Jesus had the insight to avoid sin. Nowhere can it be suggested that Jesus ever sinned...but im sure the rest of them did, as do we.
GDR writes:
In my view the Christian message as I understand it makes sense of the world as I experience it, but everything that I have just outlined is taken on faith and are my subjective beliefs, no matter how well founded I contend that they are.
Yes, we cant say that it is objective...only fellow believers can say that it is objective within the context of their belief. Taken sociologically, it is all subjective.
We shouldn’t try and fit God into the box of a God dictated inerrant Bible, which there is no good reason to do. We are then free, using our God given ability to reason, to try to understand how God has done what He has done, and even look at what He continues to do.
God foreknew that humans would have limited imagination and intelligence..as well as certain inborn predispositions...and I believe that He communed with us from that perspective.
GDR writes:
I also look at our historical record and it appears to me that not only have we evolved physically but that we are evolving morally as well. I would agree that it isn’t a consistent advancement but if you are to compare the culture in the majority of the world today to the most civilized cultures of the world 2000 years ago, or even just a couple of centuries ago, we are making progress.
In some ways yes. In other ways, no. I believe that we have potential to a foreknown degree and that we are expected to try and do our best. Only then will God revisit us and finalize our eternal destiny.
It is my view that God does influence us through our hearts, minds and imagination but also that He does use our socialization as a tool to spread the compassionate infection.
Explain this concept further, if you will.
The second aspect of the current world situation I’ll address is another kind of clash — the much-discussed clash between science and religion. Like the first kind of clash, this one has a long and instructive history. It can be traced at least as far back as ancient Babylon, where eclipses that had long been attributed to restless and malignant supernatural beings were suddenly found to occur at predictable intervals — predictable enough to make you wonder whether restless and malignant supernatural beings were really the problem.
All I can say is that if malignant supernatural beings exist, their lone purpose is to keep people from believing the living truth. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger. I am unafraid to question the truth, but I have not doubted it..nor Him...whom I consider to essentially be "it".
GDR writes:
Part of what I believe as a Christian is that God is eternal. Both science and philosophers have speculated on having more than one dimension of time. We move infinitely around in 3 spatial dimensions so it seems reasonable to me that if God’s heavenly dimension had 3 time dimensions then that would allow for an eternal existence. Once again it is highly speculative but it does give us one possible way of understanding an eternal existence.
I agree that I am shoehorning my beliefs into a science that is looking at it another way entirely but on the other hand we all have our pre-conceived ideas about reality and so I don’t think that I am really much different than anyone else in doing that.
Lets talk, GDR! I always like discussing faith with others, and it is nice to have a fellow Christian to talk with. I have some simple questions to get this discussion going. First, I'll let you expound further.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by GDR, posted 05-04-2013 7:13 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by GDR, posted 05-05-2013 10:28 AM Phat has replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 8 of 1324 (698336)
05-05-2013 3:46 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by GDR
05-05-2013 10:28 AM


Re: Synopsis I
GDR writes:
The good news is that on balance, as Robert Wright pointed out, the world is becoming a more compassionate place. Goodness is slowly winning.
Perhaps that explains the near inevitability of wars(and rumors of wars). Its not simply inequality and survival of the fittest. Its the enemy, faced with the realization that he,she,it,(us?) is losing...causing wars to try and kill the ever growing faith in goodness.
The concept of spiritual war...and war in general...shows me that something is not quite right.
We humans (unbelievers also) need to ask ourselves if we are fighting anything and what that is. We also need to ask ourselves if it is possible to have a global communion of love and acceptance without Jesus Christ.(The Spiritual head of it.) I think not...but of course critics would say I am biased towards religion and/or belief. Guilty.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by GDR, posted 05-05-2013 10:28 AM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by GDR, posted 05-05-2013 5:24 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 24 of 1324 (698502)
05-07-2013 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by Tangle
05-07-2013 8:29 AM


Re: The Gospel Message
To me, it all boils down to belief in human wisdom and rationalization versus belief in God...admittedly irrational for an educated mindset.
You say you see no need to believe in " such a non entity...(a concept at best)" and that humans can do fine without it.
I think you have answered this before, but would you be willing to accept such a concept if such a concept became alive, personal, and evident?(assuming that He hypothetically could.)
Would you surrender your final answer and accept the evidence?
(and before you answer, im guessing that you will say "I see no evidence and have asked for it before!! Thus .....) right?
So what I'm saying is do you honestly think you could accept Him before the evidence presented itself? As in a hypothetical or shall I say conditional acceptance.
You may then resort to saying you see no need for such a hypothetical, in which case I would claim that you decided to reject a potential actuality by asserting your human wisdom as the final arbiter of said belief...(am I being to obtuse with words?)
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by Tangle, posted 05-07-2013 8:29 AM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Tangle, posted 05-07-2013 3:23 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 31 by Stile, posted 05-08-2013 8:45 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 47 of 1324 (698732)
05-09-2013 6:28 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by ringo
05-08-2013 2:07 PM


Finite human wisdom versus infinite timeless wisdom
GDR writes:
When we read through the OT we can see that humans have always had a proclivity to make laws that are attributed to God in order to keep(or) maintain control. Jesus took all the laws that the early Jews had come up with and told them instead that it is all about love, and I have no doubt that if we were listening he would tell us the same thing today.
These days, humans make "laws" concerning morality, social equality, and ethics using science. In my opinion, humans are still desiring to maintain control, only now instead of interpreting Gods law their own way they simply have eliminated God from the equation entirely...justifying societal control on the idea that we(humanity) are our own authority.
GDR writes:
I'm wondering why you would think that the Biblical authors would think of eternal only lasting for any specific period of time. I know we often exaggerate and say that it took an eternity for something to happen but I don't believe that is what the Biblical authors would be thinking. It seems to me that they are pretty clear that God always was and always will be.
Revelation talks of Jesus Christ who was, is, and will be. Past, Present, and Future. It also mentions a Beast..(a literal and/or archetypical "villain" who once was, now is not and yet is for those whose names are not written in the book of life. Jesus was. There is no indication of a Beginning. The Beast Once was which indicates a created (or finite) part of time.
Ringo writes:
"Always" is itself an expression of time. It simply means an unimaginable period of time. As I have already mentioned, ancient people couldn't imagine millions or billions of years. Neither can we, really.(...)I don't see any reason to think the Bible authors were using the idea of "always" any differently than we do.
Look at God and Job:
quote:
Job 1:1-- In the land of Uz there lived a man whose name was Job.(...)Job 1:3--He was the greatest man among all the people of the East.
We read of the trial Job faced. We read of how he questions the One who was, is and always will be. He even curses his own finite sliver of time...from his birth to his death.Job 3:3, 3:11 among other places.
The problem with human wisdom is that it attempts to frame every issue as if it were we that were before the issue and after the issue.Human wisdom is but a finite sliver of time. Humans themselves are but a finite sliver of time(and space) and yet we dare to frame/and or conceive of all of it. The vastness...the infinite.
Job is wise enough to know that finite human wisdom won't get him out of this trial.
quote:
Job 6:13--Do I have any power to help myself, now that success has been driven from me?
He is wise enough to know that even his friends cant answer his questions, well meaning though they may be. They have finite ability to reason.
quote:
Job 6:24-25--Teach me, and I will be quiet; show me where I have been wrong.
25 How painful are honest words! But what do your arguments prove?
Job is hurting, and through the finite wisdom of his friends he also questions(yet never curses) God.
quote:
Job 7:7-- Remember, O God, that my life is but a breath; my eyes will never see happiness again.
Job knows his life is finite. His wisdom is finite. His sliver of time has, in his mind, been cursed.
Job also knows that God is more powerful than he is. The fear of the Lord is indeed the beginning of wisdom. Modern man seems to have lost this concept.
So....getting back to this concept of time.....
Ringo writes:
I don't think the authors of the Bible would have agreed with you. Their idea of eternity seems closer to our idea of deep time, though they had no conception of how deep "ordinary" time really is. They were most likely thinking of eternity in terms of thousands of years, not even millions or billions.
Look again at Job.
quote:
Job 11:7-9 "Can you fathom the mysteries of God? Can you probe the limits of the Almighty?
8 They are higher than the heavens-what can you do? They are deeper than the depths of the grave-what can you know? 9 Their measure is longer than the earth and wider than the sea.
Whether it be eons, thousands of years, hundreds of miles or billions or trillions of miles, the concept is that God is greater. His limits are limitless. His wisdom exceeds our wisdom. Our wisdom and conceptualization is and always will be finite.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by ringo, posted 05-08-2013 2:07 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by ringo, posted 05-09-2013 12:39 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 72 of 1324 (698840)
05-10-2013 12:14 AM
Reply to: Message 70 by GDR
05-09-2013 7:23 PM


Re: The Gospel Message
GDR writes:
After all, it is truth that we are supposed to be seeking and we should be open to the idea that maybe there is a better understanding to be had.
I choose to believe that there is more wisdom overall on the planet now there was then.
The source of wisdom is, in my belief, God.
quote:
Isa 11:2-3
2 The Spirit of the LORD will rest on him--
the Spirit of wisdom and of understanding,
the Spirit of counsel and of power,
the Spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD--
3 and he will delight in the fear of the LORD.
jar may (i say may ) argue that I am speaking of source versus content and that source is irrelevant. I would disagree, claiming that content is source.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by GDR, posted 05-09-2013 7:23 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by GDR, posted 05-10-2013 10:57 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 95 of 1324 (698979)
05-12-2013 7:43 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by Faith
05-11-2013 9:36 PM


Keeping The Faith
Faith writes:
That's quite an odd distinction, but as far as taking away sins goes, that is what the Messiah's mission was, as the angel told Joseph: Mat 1:21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins. (The name Jesus means Jehovah the Savior)
Im checking to see if Faith did her homework...
quote:
Matt 1:20-2:1-NIV
20 But after he had considered this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph son of David, do not be afraid to take Mary home as your wife, because what is conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit. 21 She will give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins."
22 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23 "The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel"-which means, "God with us."
24 When Joseph woke up, he did what the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife. 25 But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.
Easton Bible Dictionary writes:
his is the Greek form of the Hebrew name Joshua, which was originally Hoshea (Num. 13:8, 16), but changed by Moses into Jehoshua (Num. 13:16; 1 Chr. 7:27), or Joshua. After the Exile it assumed the form Jeshua, whence the Greek form Jesus. It was given to our Lord to denote the object of his mission, to save (Matt. 1:21).
Not bad, Faith ... The meaning of the last name is also important. Christ means "the anointed One". Critics claim that any of us could be anointed, but as the officials of that time (who were not followers) said,
quote:
The officers answered, No one ever spoke like this man!
.
See all translations.
Faith writes:
Hell is for sinners, though bad theology can be implied in some sorts of sins. But Hell is for sinners, those who violate God's Law, adulterers, murderers and so on and so forth. My only point was that the loving Jesus spoke of Hell more than anyone else in scripture. He died to save us from it.
Hell was created not for sinful humans but for fallen angels who initially chose to rebel from Communion with God. Humans only end up in hell due to our own choice to deny Jesus Christ and to follow an unclean spirit (or even our own fallible human wisdom that refuses to acknowledge Jesus Christ for who He is. ) People are never sent to hell. They make the choice. Humans are not punished for having free will. Humans choose to punish themselves through willful ignorance...denying a loving man in which no fault was found.
Edited by Phat, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by Faith, posted 05-11-2013 9:36 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by Faith, posted 05-12-2013 11:30 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 99 of 1324 (698989)
05-12-2013 4:13 PM
Reply to: Message 96 by AZPaul3
05-12-2013 8:40 AM


AZ Come, AZ Go
AZPaul3 writes:
Assessment is as simple as: If this claim is true then we should see this thing here.
Why must we see it?
If this claim is true then these laws of physics would be violated in these specific ways. Do we see that thing there? Have we seen any instance where these laws were violated in those specific ways?
Human wisdom is limited to a miniscule time and space. Our imagination (and even our evidence) does not contain the known universe.
Done right, science can accurately assess the veracity of any claim and appropriately conclude that such claim is so ludicrous and unlikely as to be indistinguishable from false.
Science never uses terms such as ludicrous. This is your own personal bias against the idea of God. The fact is, if you are honest with yourself, you dont even doubt that you are right. You do doubt that you are wrong, however.
The error bars are but semantical quibble for believers to cry over trying to resurrect their dead ideas.
Totally your perspective. Far from a unanimous belief. You've been hanging out with too many of your own kind. You will be humbled, and the smugness will disappear. My advice? Don't rule it out and stay humble.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by AZPaul3, posted 05-12-2013 8:40 AM AZPaul3 has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 133 of 1324 (699232)
05-16-2013 6:37 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Tangle
05-06-2013 4:24 PM


Re: The Gospel Message
Tangle,speaking to GDR writes:
I'd say that you'd have to duck and dive, twist and jive more than you've managed so far to take these to mean anything other than what they actually say.
Mark 16:16 ESV
Whoever believes and is baptized will be saved, but whoever does not believe will be condemned.
John 14:6 ESV
Jesus said to him, I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
It's crystal clear what these verses are intended to mean. To make them mean something else, you need to actually change the meaning of the words.
So whats your point? Would you even want to consider the verses as addressed to you personally? If they were, would you consider following their advice or would you naturally rebel?? Does your concept of "universal human desire" have room in it for Jesus Christ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Tangle, posted 05-06-2013 4:24 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by Tangle, posted 05-16-2013 7:05 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 157 of 1324 (699380)
05-18-2013 9:31 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by GDR
05-17-2013 2:37 PM


Introspective Observations About Time
GDR writes:
I'm saying that our understanding of time has a long way to go, with the suggestion that the idea of experiencing time differently than we do is not that strange of an idea.
I have personally noticed several things about my perception of time.
1) The older you are, the faster it seems to go in some sense, and yet the slower it goes in other senses.
This is logical. For a five year old, summer seems to last a long time, as does winter. Reason? I fgure that 3 months is a bigger percentage of a five year olds lifetime than it is of a 60 year old.
So in that sense time speeds up as one gets older. Grandma sees the grandkids and exclaims how it was "only yesterday they were so small!"
The years go by as if in a blur. Time is measured not in days or months, but in events...like family vacations.
Yet in other ways, past events still seem as vivid in some minds as present events. It can be said that some folks "live" in the past. For them, time stopped at one point...perhaps years ago...and they see it as yesterday.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by GDR, posted 05-17-2013 2:37 PM GDR has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by GDR, posted 05-18-2013 11:18 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 180 of 1324 (699771)
05-25-2013 9:11 AM
Reply to: Message 178 by ringo
05-24-2013 2:15 PM


Hiding In Gaps
Ringo writes:
You say that God must do A and science shows that A doesn't require God's intervention. Then you admit that God doesn't do A but He must still do B. Then Science shows that B doesn't require God's intervention either and you say okay but God must stll do C. You may never run out of gaps but you're still hiding in them, not helping to fill them in.
In my opinion, God(Creator of all seen and unseen) will always be beyond human understanding. We could ask the question as to whether God and/or Jesus would ever be better understood through science alone.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by ringo, posted 05-24-2013 2:15 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by ringo, posted 05-25-2013 12:14 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 188 of 1324 (699920)
05-28-2013 11:01 AM
Reply to: Message 186 by ringo
05-27-2013 12:14 PM


Human Wisdom versus Godly Impartation
Ringo writes:
Religion says, "Hey, there's a gap here. God must be in it." Science fills in the gap with real-world knowledge.
I would tend to see it more as "Human Wisdom" fills in the gap. This is true to a degree, but I believe that human wisdom will ever erase the reality of, never-mind the need of God.
I believe that God actually gives men wisdom.
1 Kings 4:29-5:1 writes:
29 God gave Solomon wisdom and very great insight, and a breadth of understanding as measureless as the sand on the seashore. 30 Solomon's wisdom was greater than the wisdom of all the men of the East, and greater than all the wisdom of Egypt. 31 He was wiser than any other man, including Ethan the Ezrahite-wiser than Heman, Calcol and Darda, the sons of Mahol. And his fame spread to all the surrounding nations. 32 He spoke three thousand proverbs and his songs numbered a thousand and five. 33 He described plant life, from the cedar of Lebanon to the hyssop that grows out of walls. He also taught about animals and birds, reptiles and fish. 34 Men of all nations came to listen to Solomon's wisdom, sent by all the kings of the world, who had heard of his wisdom.
Obviously I cant support the idea that the written word was the living word, except through lengthy observation and acquaintance with modern day Solomons. Also, were Solomon alive today in today's context he would not simply sit on some mountain top like an aloof sage. He would interact with modern education and media to a degree...but I believe that the root of his wisdom would come about through his relationship with God on a daily basis.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by ringo, posted 05-27-2013 12:14 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by ringo, posted 05-28-2013 12:24 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 727 of 1324 (703540)
07-24-2013 1:32 PM
Reply to: Message 726 by hooah212002
07-24-2013 12:40 PM


Re: Human History, Theism and Faith in Tom
ow, go tell the little kid that just got raped by his step dad that "god is kind loving and just". Go tell the infant girl in Africa that just got gang raped by a bunch of AIDS ridden assholes that think raping her will cure their AIDS that "god is kind loving and just". Go tell the young boy who is homeless because his mom is a junkie that "god is kind living and just".
I'll tell you one thing. science based counseling wont ease their hurt any quicker, if at all.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 726 by hooah212002, posted 07-24-2013 12:40 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 728 by Theodoric, posted 07-24-2013 1:37 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 730 by Stile, posted 07-24-2013 2:13 PM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 1197 of 1324 (707369)
09-26-2013 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 1192 by Straggler
09-26-2013 6:35 AM


Beliefs vs Evidence
Straggler writes:
When one's theistic beliefs require one to deny scientific findings and conclusions then the game really is up.
Keep in mind that the forum is Faith/Belief. You do have a valid point, though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1192 by Straggler, posted 09-26-2013 6:35 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 1301 of 1324 (708852)
10-15-2013 3:13 PM
Reply to: Message 1300 by Stile
10-15-2013 1:24 PM


Re: Reasonable Ramblings
I challenge the idea that 85 is always science and that 25 is always faith. This may well be true in the science of evolution vs biblical creationism, but the Bible has some deep insights into human nature that science is only now beginning to catch up with.
Lets take the science behind addiction.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1300 by Stile, posted 10-15-2013 1:24 PM Stile has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1303 by Tangle, posted 10-15-2013 4:23 PM Phat has replied
 Message 1304 by Stile, posted 10-16-2013 10:22 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 1309 by GDR, posted 10-16-2013 11:58 AM Phat has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18350
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 1305 of 1324 (708912)
10-16-2013 10:37 AM
Reply to: Message 1303 by Tangle
10-15-2013 4:23 PM


Re: Reasonable Ramblings
Again--Lets take the science behind addiction.
Look at Romans.. 7:15
15 I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do. 16 And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree that the law is good. 17 As it is, it is no longer I myself who do it, but it is sin living in me. 18 For I know that good itself does not dwell in me, that is, in my sinful nature.[c] For I have the desire to do what is good, but I cannot carry it out. 19 For I do not do the good I want to do, but the evil I do not want to do”this I keep on doing. 20 Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me that does it.
They now know that addictions cannot be easily stopped. The reason is because the brain actually changes. Certain neural pathways are laid down and reinforced...so that to attempt to stop in the middle of the loop is next to impossible.
Possible...yet not easy at all. Blindingly obvious? The addictions experts are only now catching up to explaining it in a way other than sin.
Not only do we generate neurological pathways of behavior in our brain, we become addicted to our own brain chemicals. Just as an addict must get high off an external chemical, we too can be addicted to a behavioral strategy which releases the sought after chemicals. If our behavior is of a positive nature then we never worry about it. But, if the behavior is undesirable, we may try all manner of interventions to change it only to find we’re replacing it with something else. Oddly, the Biblical passage essentially says the same thing. We replace sanity with sin...even when we know better.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1303 by Tangle, posted 10-15-2013 4:23 PM Tangle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 1307 by Diomedes, posted 10-16-2013 11:27 AM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 1311 by Theodoric, posted 10-16-2013 3:53 PM Phat has seen this message but not replied
 Message 1314 by Tangle, posted 10-16-2013 5:33 PM Phat has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024