Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   And he's a significant candidate why? (re: Gary Johnson)
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 4 of 13 (791884)
09-25-2016 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rrhain
09-24-2016 11:15 PM


Well, You Asked
Rrhain writes:
Johnson is pulling a significant portion of his voters from younger voters, who are also more likely to be concerned about climate change.
Why is he a significant candidate again?
You asked, and the answer is reasonably simple.
First, Gary Johnson is absolutely wrong on not just climate change but also income inequality - I hope we can agree on that point.
(Also, would you liberals please stop wimping out - it's global warming just like it's deferred compensation, not entitlements and liberal. not progressive - damn chickenshits bowing to Rupert Murdock).
However, "climate change" (ugh) is but one of many issues, albeit the most important one. How about the others?
As I said before Johnson is completely wrong about the second most important issue - namely income inequality. There is an easy fix in simply taxing capital gains and dividends at an equal or greater rate than earned wages - problem largely (but not completely for everyone) solved.
So will Hillary Clinton support this first step? I have heard nothing.
Wars of choice are expensive, they hurt the US wage earner and kill those of
every age and gender. Johnson and Jill Stein are against wars of choice, Clinton - ahem - Libya, Iraq, who knows where else. Thank God Bernie Sanders was not the President of Honduras for he would be homeless now at best and his nation would now be the murder capitol of the world for the next few years.
Millennials don't just think black lives matter, they even extend such compassion and empathy to (heaven forbid) Central Americans, who incidentally due to Clinton, among others (yeah, you too Obama), are responsible for a large part of illegal immigration from people fleeing the chaos they themselves created. Unlike the idiot who gives the color orange a bad name and falsely blames it on Mexico - it's not Il Duce it's Ill Douche.
Some may be selling but millennials ain't buying.
Gary Johnson will flat-out veto any and every bill until the budget is balanced, unlike Republicans who balloon the budget deficit to pay off their rich contributor buddies or Democrats who - while making an effort - also fail at elementary school math.
Gary Johnson will end the incarceration industrial complex, Bill Clinton, with Hillary's blessing, helped create it. Sheet - Johnson smokes weed, love to share some of Colorado's finest with him.
I lived in New Mexico when Gary Johnson was the Governor. Best damn Governor the state ever had. He really hates corruption and even had the leader of the State Senate arrested for taking bribes. I have only voted for a Republican for a major office three times in my life and this one is the one I am most proud of.
Millennials don't like corruption either and they are certainly more against it than Boomers or Xers have shown.
Most importantly to Millennials, Johnson is genuine like Bernie Sanders, he is not a fake or phony, unlike traditional bribe-taking politicians.
There is even more, but Rrhain, you are quite intelligent, I think you get the point. Some Millennials take the entirety of their concerns and weigh the balance to see which side tips the scales. In the end, I think most will vote for Clinton because, rightfully so, Trump is the worst scum since Sarah Palin.
As for me I agree with my daughter. If Clinton is within the margin of error for the state poll, I will hold my nose and vote for her just to keep the criminal con man (who belongs in prison, but money buys justice - another thing Millennials hate) Trump from winning. Other than that it's Jill Stein all the way even though I am appalled by her inability to call the anti-vax people what they truly are - child murderer enablers.
Or I may just go full Millennial and write in Bernie. Ball's in your court Jill.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider. - Francis Bacon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rrhain, posted 09-24-2016 11:15 PM Rrhain has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by ramoss, posted 09-25-2016 11:17 PM anglagard has not replied
 Message 6 by Rrhain, posted 09-26-2016 9:00 PM anglagard has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 866 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


(1)
Message 11 of 13 (792155)
10-05-2016 7:40 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by Tanypteryx
09-29-2016 10:05 PM


Have to Agree
Tanypteryx writes:
I think you are far too kind.........he's a total flaming pile of shit nut job.
Recent Aleppo moments seem to indicate your analysis is correct.
I don't know what happened - early onset Alzheimer's, hanging out with a bad crowd (Libertarians), lack of positive role models - anyone's guess.
He was a great governor (guess you had to be there), but now the dude has lost it.
Sheesh, say a few positive things about the guy that may influence the stance of millennials and he does everything to embarrass you.
Meanwhile Clinton kills Trump in debate and even grudgingly adopts some of Bernie's ideas (hopefully with some sincerity - please no more unnecessary wars).
Prediction: Johnson and Stein 3% or less. Clinton 55% or better.
But then what do I know, my last post indicated I thought Johnson was still sane.
Edited by anglagard, : embarrassed by spelling error.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider. - Francis Bacon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Tanypteryx, posted 09-29-2016 10:05 PM Tanypteryx has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by Rrhain, posted 10-06-2016 2:14 AM anglagard has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024